Australian Politics Forum - The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77706
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #45 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Sir Eoin O Fada

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2912
New England, NSW
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #46 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 6:52pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

Depends on the circumstances.

Back to top

Self defence is a right.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52331
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #47 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:01pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

Roe v Wade or its overturning was not about what a woman does to her own body.
It is about what the state does or does not, or facilitates or not, to be done to her body BY OTHERS.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Tap

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 488
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #48 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:20pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

So, what you must then assume is that if someone murders another, the constitution protects their right to privacy because it was between them and their victim, and the government has no business interfering with them keeping their murder private?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77706
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #49 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:05pm

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

Roe v Wade or its overturning was not about what a woman does to her own body.
It is about what the state does or does not, or facilitates or not, to be done to her body BY OTHERS.

Sure it was. They ignored the woman's constitutional right to privacy free from govt. Interference and pretended it was about the states. Roe v wade wasn't ever the right to abort, it was the right of women to do what they wanted to with their bodies without govt interference. That's why the whole argument about how old a foetus has to be before it becomes a living entity became important. Once it becomes a living entity govt then has a right to interfere becauseits thenno longerjustaboutthewoman.

The supreme Court had it right the first time.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77706
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #50 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:06pm

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

So, what you must then assume is that if someone murders another, the constitution protects their right to privacy because it was between them and their victim, and the government has no business interfering with them keeping their murder private?

No, your right to privacy disappears once your actions affect someone else.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Tap

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 488
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #51 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:59pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:06pm:

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

So, what you must then assume is that if someone murders another, the constitution protects their right to privacy because it was between them and their victim, and the government has no business interfering with them keeping their murder private?

No, your right to privacy disappears once your actions affect someone else.

So now that the right to an abortion is no longer protected by the constitution in America and the states can decide what restrictions they wish, what do you think can be done to change the constitution back to create a new right to abortion like in 1973 when there was no right to abortion like today?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77706
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #52 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:41pm

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:59pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:06pm:

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

So, what you must then assume is that if someone murders another, the constitution protects their right to privacy because it was between them and their victim, and the government has no business interfering with them keeping their murder private?

No, your right to privacy disappears once your actions affect someone else.

So now that the right to an abortion is no longer protected by the constitution in America and the states can decide what restrictions they wish, what do you think can be done to change the constitution back to create a new right to abortion like in 1973 when there was no right to abortion like today?

The states are breeching the constitution by denying women their right to privacy. Roe v wade was never about a right to 'abortion ' that was a consequence of what happened after the supreme Court ruled women's privacy was protected under the constitution

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Tap

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 488
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #53 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:49pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:41pm:

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:59pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:06pm:

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

So, what you must then assume is that if someone murders another, the constitution protects their right to privacy because it was between them and their victim, and the government has no business interfering with them keeping their murder private?

No, your right to privacy disappears once your actions affect someone else.

So now that the right to an abortion is no longer protected by the constitution in America and the states can decide what restrictions they wish, what do you think can be done to change the constitution back to create a new right to abortion like in 1973 when there was no right to abortion like today?

The states are breeching the constitution by denying women their right to privacy. Roe v wade was never about a right to 'abortion ' that was a consequence of what happened after the supreme Court ruled women's privacy was protected under the constitution

So what do you suggest? The federal government, and congress cant wave a magic wand to give abortions back to women. Whats your remedy?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77706
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #54 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:51pm

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:49pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:41pm:

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:59pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:06pm:

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

So, what you must then assume is that if someone murders another, the constitution protects their right to privacy because it was between them and their victim, and the government has no business interfering with them keeping their murder private?

No, your right to privacy disappears once your actions affect someone else.

So now that the right to an abortion is no longer protected by the constitution in America and the states can decide what restrictions they wish, what do you think can be done to change the constitution back to create a new right to abortion like in 1973 when there was no right to abortion like today?

The states are breeching the constitution by denying women their right to privacy. Roe v wade was never about a right to 'abortion ' that was a consequence of what happened after the supreme Court ruled women's privacy was protected under the constitution

So what do you suggest? The federal government, and congress cant wave a magic wand to give abortions back to women. Whats your remedy?

Get rid of the stooges Trump put in the supreme Court

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52331
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #55 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:51pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:05pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

Roe v Wade or its overturning was not about what a woman does to her own body.
It is about what the state does or does not, or facilitates or not, to be done to her body BY OTHERS.

Sure it was. They ignored the woman's constitutional right to privacy free from govt. Interference and pretended it was about the states. Roe v wade wasn't ever the right to abort, it was the right of women to do what they wanted to with their bodies without govt interference. That's why the whole argument about how old a foetus has to be before it becomes a living entity became important. Once it becomes a living entity govt then has a right to interfere becauseits thenno longerjustaboutthewoman.

The supreme Court had it right the first time.

A woman can do whatever she wants.
The law is about what the state can and cannot do in response.

You have the right to privacy and chop off your own arm or perform a DIY abortion on yourself.
But you do not have the right to request that somebody else perform an abortion for you or chop off your arm without the law having a look-in.

The whole brouhaha is about who makes such a law - elected representatives or unelected judges. You can jump off a cliff but the law will be involved if someone else pushes you off that cliff. The law is involved. The point is - who can make the law.

It's not complicated. Well, maybe it is for you, militantly thick buggers.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 77706
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #56 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:02pm

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:51pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:05pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

Roe v Wade or its overturning was not about what a woman does to her own body.
It is about what the state does or does not, or facilitates or not, to be done to her body BY OTHERS.

Sure it was. They ignored the woman's constitutional right to privacy free from govt. Interference and pretended it was about the states. Roe v wade wasn't ever the right to abort, it was the right of women to do what they wanted to with their bodies without govt interference. That's why the whole argument about how old a foetus has to be before it becomes a living entity became important. Once it becomes a living entity govt then has a right to interfere becauseits thenno longerjustaboutthewoman.

The supreme Court had it right the first time.

A woman can do whatever she wants.
The law is about what the state can and cannot do in response.

You have the right to privacy and chop off your own arm or perform a DIY abortion on yourself.
But you do not have the right to request that somebody else perform an abortion for you or chop off your arm without the law having a look-in.

The whole brouhaha is about who makes such a law - elected representatives or unelected judges. You can jump off a cliff but the law will be involved if someone else pushes you off that cliff. The law is involved. The point is - who can make the law.

It's not complicated. Well, maybe it is for you, militantly thick buggers.

Crap.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52331
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #57 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:07pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:02pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:51pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:05pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

Roe v Wade or its overturning was not about what a woman does to her own body.
It is about what the state does or does not, or facilitates or not, to be done to her body BY OTHERS.

Sure it was. They ignored the woman's constitutional right to privacy free from govt. Interference and pretended it was about the states. Roe v wade wasn't ever the right to abort, it was the right of women to do what they wanted to with their bodies without govt interference. That's why the whole argument about how old a foetus has to be before it becomes a living entity became important. Once it becomes a living entity govt then has a right to interfere becauseits thenno longerjustaboutthewoman.

The supreme Court had it right the first time.

A woman can do whatever she wants.
The law is about what the state can and cannot do in response.

You have the right to privacy and chop off your own arm or perform a DIY abortion on yourself.
But you do not have the right to request that somebody else perform an abortion for you or chop off your arm without the law having a look-in.

The whole brouhaha is about who makes such a law - elected representatives or unelected judges. You can jump off a cliff but the law will be involved if someone else pushes you off that cliff. The law is involved. The point is - who can make the law.

It's not complicated. Well, maybe it is for you, militantly thick buggers.

Crap.

You are scaling the usual lows of your erudition, thick ****.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Tap

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 488
Gender: male

Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade
Reply #58 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:25pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:51pm:

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:49pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 9:41pm:

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:59pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 8:06pm:

Tap wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 7:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 5:27pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 12:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:59am:

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2023 at 10:10am:

The States have their own democratically elected parliaments and governments which make laws that reflect the will of the people in each state.

The states are still bound by the constitution

So they are. And?

The constitution says that AMERICANS have a right to privacy, free from interference from govt . What a woman does to her body has nothing to do with govco.

So, what you must then assume is that if someone murders another, the constitution protects their right to privacy because it was between them and their victim, and the government has no business interfering with them keeping their murder private?

No, your right to privacy disappears once your actions affect someone else.

So now that the right to an abortion is no longer protected by the constitution in America and the states can decide what restrictions they wish, what do you think can be done to change the constitution back to create a new right to abortion like in 1973 when there was no right to abortion like today?

The states are breeching the constitution by denying women their right to privacy. Roe v wade was never about a right to 'abortion ' that was a consequence of what happened after the supreme Court ruled women's privacy was protected under the constitution

So what do you suggest? The federal government, and congress cant wave a magic wand to give abortions back to women. Whats your remedy?

Get rid of the stooges Trump put in the supreme Court

Thats never going to happen. They will be justices to the supreme court for life. The next few decades at least, so realistically what do you propose the remedy should be?

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 49677 Gender:	Re: The Retarded Right and aftereffects of Roe V Wade Reply #59 - Dec 27^th, 2023 at 11:40pm Flood the court with Democrat judges.
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged