Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Send Topic Print
I Was Only Nineteen - New Release (Read 3734 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #75 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 12:44pm
 
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 4:17am:
And no National Service man was "forced" into a posting
to Vietnam.  The ADF much preferred nashos who had
a desire to go rather than those who didn't want to
be there from day one.


I have known a few who maintained they did not volunteer for service in South Vietnam but were volunteered.  Apparently an officer would volunteer a subunit for service there without the members knowing about it.  As I have indicated, there were provisions for Nashos to be ordered to serve.

Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Big Donger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102237
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #76 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:02pm
 
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 1:33am:
To mark the 40th anniversary of the release of this
song relating to Australia's involvement in the Vietnam
war, the recording by Redgum, has been reworked. 

Redgum's lead vocalist-guitarist, John Schumann,
wrote the song based on experiences he heard from
veterans including his brother in-law.

     This song has a special emotional significance for
     me, and I must admit to being a little disappointed
     with this 2023, reworked and re-recorded version...

    

It's "nice" but has lost the subtle emotional depths of the
original—partly because, I think, of overproduction(?). 
Schumann still emotes as per the original, but the addition
of Donna Simpson's opening, vocals (as she sings about her
father), spoils it.

     This is the original version...

    

As far as I'm concerned, there was no need to change
the original, as it's stood the test of time, and with a
special significance—especially to former diggers—who
are all in their 70s by now... or deceased.

There's also a couple of errors in the lyrics.  Anybody notice?



The most viscerally powerful song ever written in Australia. Every word packs a gut punch. This song never fails to bring tears, even if you weren't there.

This song shows the power of words and music like no one ever truly has before. You don't need to sing it, just say it. Speak the truth. Tell it like it was. Be specific.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2023 at 1:07pm by Big Donger »  
 
IP Logged
 
Big Donger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102237
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #77 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 3:58pm
 
Jasin wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 6:58am:
Vietnam War
: The Enslavement of Australian Civilians by their Military/Political Industry (just another Company/Corporation) to go fight Yellow People in their own part of the world for a Privatised Political system based upon archaic Roman/Greek politics - known as the USA: the most invasive nation on the planet.


A better song would have been : I was only a Civilian


Menzies and Holt were responsible for that war, dear. They didn't just follow Uncle in, they actively hussled him to come on down.

Menzies, Fadden and Black Jack McEwen were Yellow Peril paranoiacs. The Libs, Country Party and Uncle's spooks in Australia saw Vietnam through that lens. The Domino Theory was influential in corporate/investment circles and spread through the print media. Back then, the media was devoutly pro-Liberal, especially broadsheets like the Herald and Age. They kept Menzies in power for a generation.

The ALP saw things differently. Arthur Calwell opposed conscription and Australian intervention. While his views represented a minority in the party, Jim Cairns organised and demonstrated against the war. Cairns brought many anti-war protesters into the ALP, the middle class "new left", who would be instrumental in bringing Whitlam to power in 1973. The Vietnam war was certainly unpopular in hard-left industrial union circles, but they were wedged by Soviet, Maoist and Trotskyist parties with conflicting positions.

China withdrew support for North Vietnam in 1968 during the Sino-Soviet split. Australian Maoists continued to demonstrate against Vietnam, but they saw the war as a symptom rather than a cause in itself.

After the Tet Offensive in 68, everything changed. In 1971, Gough was the first Western leader to visit Red China, beating Henry Kissenger by a whisker. When the Whitlam government came to power in 1972, Australia withdrew the few forces we had left in Vietnam.

After we pulled out, everything changed again. Gough got the sack, Fraser got in, and the Liberal Party went from being defenders of a White Australia to being liberal Cold War warriors, rescuing and settling thousands of Vietnamese refugees, then known as boat people.

There are no bones on this point. While the Whitlam government formally ended the White Australia Policy, loosening restrictions on non-European migrants to keep much-needed labour coming into Australia, the Fraser government introduced multiculturalism.

Imagine, in the space of ten years, the Libs went from inviting Uncle down to save Australia from Yellow Peril, just like they did with the Japs in WWII, to inviting Vietnamese boat people in to call Australia home.

How some things change, eh? That war ended the White Australia Policy for good. We went from being a dull British colonial backwater to becoming a vibrant, prosperous middle power in the Asia-Pacific and world stage. Australia was instrumental in both the creation of APEC and the rising influence of the G20. Our participation in these forums and in global affairs generally  has been pivotal to our sustained economic growth, our standard of living and our global reach.

Vietnam was a monumental foreign policy failure and an existential loss, not just of all those 19 year old kids, but our integrity, our commitment to our own values. After all, we weren't defending ourselves or our friends in Nam as we did in WWII, we were getting involved in the post-colonial affairs of a neighbour. This wasn't merely at the behest of our imperialist Uncle. We meddled, mobilised and got in ourselves, so do you know?

Next time someone complains about some foreign evil and says we need to go in, remember this. Next time the media kicks up a row, targets the Muselman, the tinted races, the Chows or Jigaboos, think and say ah. You remember now, didn't they say the same about Nam?

Think too, the next time our friends need our help, say in Ukraine or Gaza or maybe one day Taiwan, remember Nam. These are all totally different places with different problems, but they share a common theme: one side dropping bombs on another side, who hardly have any bombs at all, just people.

I do feel one should never underestimate the importance of good manners.

You?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 56770
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #78 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 8:37pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:08pm:
Jasin wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:05pm:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:03pm:
Jasin wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 8:00pm:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:54pm:
Jasin wrote on Dec 8th, 2023 at 7:36pm:
The Strine originates from the Irish speaking Irish

It's more complicated than that.

The convicts and settlers from 1788 to the mid-19th century came from every part of the UK and Ireland, each with their own regional accents.

The Australian accent was born of the need for a 'lingua franca' among UK- and Irish-descent inhabitants of New Holland.

The term 'strine' is a recent (1965) reference to the broad Australian accent.

There are many 'accents' here in Australia from long ago.
Just as there are States & Territories.
Nothing is overly uniform here. The 'formal' description of Strine is just an 'umbrella' description for lack of really doing some research. You could say a Federal minded person wrote it up that way.
Their accents are very different like Julia Gillard's SA accent to Pauline Hanson's QLD accent - even though they're both 'Rangas'.

Shumann's Strine accent is also like the Sea Shanty songs like Bound for South Australia originally. That too is Strine, but more closer to the Irish accent as if still stuck at sea and not landed on 'australian'.

Strine is a reference to the broad Australian accent and is as uniform across the country as accents get in the Anglosphere.

Not from what I hear.
And when it comes to 'accents', I can trust better to what I 'hear', than read.

Many peoples in the UK and Ireland can barely understand each other from either end of a street, let alone regional or national accents.

There is no strine speaker who is unintelligible to any other strine speaker anywhere in Australia.


I never said anything regarding that to be the case.
Why the jump to a conclusion for want of asking me first?
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 56770
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #79 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 8:42pm
 
Big Donger wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 3:58pm:
Jasin wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 6:58am:
Vietnam War
: The Enslavement of Australian Civilians by their Military/Political Industry (just another Company/Corporation) to go fight Yellow People in their own part of the world for a Privatised Political system based upon archaic Roman/Greek politics - known as the USA: the most invasive nation on the planet.


A better song would have been : I was only a Civilian


Menzies and Holt were responsible for that war, dear. They didn't just follow Uncle in, they actively hussled him to come on down.

Menzies, Fadden and Black Jack McEwen were Yellow Peril paranoiacs. The Libs, Country Party and Uncle's spooks in Australia saw Vietnam through that lens. The Domino Theory was influential in corporate/investment circles and spread through the print media. Back then, the media was devoutly pro-Liberal, especially broadsheets like the Herald and Age. They kept Menzies in power for a generation.

The ALP saw things differently. Arthur Calwell opposed conscription and Australian intervention. While his views represented a minority in the party, Jim Cairns organised and demonstrated against the war. Cairns brought many anti-war protesters into the ALP, the middle class "new left", who would be instrumental in bringing Whitlam to power in 1973. The Vietnam war was certainly unpopular in hard-left industrial union circles, but they were wedged by Soviet, Maoist and Trotskyist parties with conflicting positions.

China withdrew support for North Vietnam in 1968 during the Sino-Soviet split. Australian Maoists continued to demonstrate against Vietnam, but they saw the war as a symptom rather than a cause in itself.

After the Tet Offensive in 68, everything changed. In 1971, Gough was the first Western leader to visit Red China, beating Henry Kissenger by a whisker. When the Whitlam government came to power in 1972, Australia withdrew the few forces we had left in Vietnam.

After we pulled out, everything changed again. Gough got the sack, Fraser got in, and the Liberal Party went from being defenders of a White Australia to being liberal Cold War warriors, rescuing and settling thousands of Vietnamese refugees, then known as boat people.

There are no bones on this point. While the Whitlam government formally ended the White Australia Policy, loosening restrictions on non-European migrants to keep much-needed labour coming into Australia, the Fraser government introduced multiculturalism.

Imagine, in the space of ten years, the Libs went from inviting Uncle down to save Australia from Yellow Peril, just like they did with the Japs in WWII, to inviting Vietnamese boat people in to call Australia home.

How some things change, eh? That war ended the White Australia Policy for good. We went from being a dull British colonial backwater to becoming a vibrant, prosperous middle power in the Asia-Pacific and world stage. Australia was instrumental in both the creation of APEC and the rising influence of the G20. Our participation in these forums and in global affairs generally  has been pivotal to our sustained economic growth, our standard of living and our global reach.

Vietnam was a monumental foreign policy failure and an existential loss, not just of all those 19 year old kids, but our integrity, our commitment to our own values. After all, we weren't defending ourselves or our friends in Nam as we did in WWII, we were getting involved in the post-colonial affairs of a neighbour. This wasn't merely at the behest of our imperialist Uncle. We meddled, mobilised and got in ourselves, so do you know?

Next time someone complains about some foreign evil and says we need to go in, remember this. Next time the media kicks up a row, targets the Muselman, the tinted races, the Chows or Jigaboos, think and say ah. You remember now, didn't they say the same about Nam?

Think too, the next time our friends need our help, say in Ukraine or Gaza or maybe one day Taiwan, remember Nam. These are all totally different places with different problems, but they share a common theme: one side dropping bombs on another side, who hardly have any bombs at all, just people.

I do feel one should never underestimate the importance of good manners.

You?



For once a very sensible post by Karnal (aka the Mattyfist).
Though I can't say much for Karnal's appraisal of the Song like it was 'more than the war itself', even better than the real thing and more human than a human.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 56770
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #80 - Dec 9th, 2023 at 8:44pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 12:44pm:
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 4:17am:
And no National Service man was "forced" into a posting
to Vietnam.  The ADF much preferred nashos who had
a desire to go rather than those who didn't want to
be there from day one.


I have known a few who maintained they did not volunteer for service in South Vietnam but were volunteered.  Apparently an officer would volunteer a subunit for service there without the members knowing about it.  As I have indicated, there were provisions for Nashos to be ordered to serve.



NASHO. The nickname the Military people give to their acquired Slaves from Civilians, to die for their Military Sins.

Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 90150
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #81 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 9:58am
 
No Nasho was nineteen - anyone nineteen was a volunteer pure and simple.

You are all barking up the wrong tree ....  I believe the original phrase came from a regular volunteer from D Coy, 6RAR after Long
Tan.... Nashos had to sign the paper for possible selection on their 20th birthday, so stop ranting about the unwillings in relation to this song ..... you are insulting them.

Maybe if we were Yanks.... they took 17 year olds ... they always draft the poor kids anyway...... no Senator's son served .... huge difference in your understanding from movies.....

"Nothing hits home more than the fact Mick Storen was 19 when he went to serve his country."

Nah - 6RAR 1969.

"Michael was 19 when he joined the Australian Army. He deployed to Vietnam in 1969 and served in 3 Platoon, A Company, 6th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment (6RAR)."
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16833
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #82 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 10:59am
 
The song is about Schumann's brother-in-law (Denny's brother), Mick Storen, who volunteered to go to Vietnam.

As Schumann tells it, from what Storen told him, was that there were five volunteers required for Vietnam with the 6RAR and Storen's Sargeant asked for them.

He received more than five volunteers so they drew cards to determine who the five would be (hence the lyric 'it was me who drew the card').

Schumann does not say Storen was only 19, so it's probably safe to assume he was at least 20.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10766
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #83 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:34pm
 
Big Donger wrote on Dec 9th, 2023 at 3:58pm:
Vietnam was a monumental foreign policy failure and an existential loss, not just of all those 19 year old kids, but our integrity, our commitment to our own values. After all, we weren't defending ourselves or our friends in Nam as we did in WWII, we were getting involved in the post-colonial affairs of a neighbour. This wasn't merely at the behest of our imperialist Uncle. We meddled, mobilised and got in ourselves, so do you know?



The biggest lie was the "Domino Effect". It was assumed that if we didn't fight the North Vietnamese, communism would spread to Australia, and millions of voters believed it - bloody idiots

The North Vietnamese won the war, and then, communism was supposed to spread to Australia, but instead, we got convoys of leaky boats full of cheeky Vietnamese refugees escaping the new regime in Vietnam

Believing the "Domino Effect" only exposed the utter stupidity of the voters, both Lib voters and others who believed it, for keeping the Coalition in power up to 1972

Menzies kicked the bucket in 1965, so he didn't have to face the music and explain why Australia was spared communism, nor did that upstart Holt. As a conscript, I was getting my revenge. I visited Portsea not long before that idiot Holt met his demise, I went on a sightseeing drive from Balcombe Signals camp where I was stationed, to Portsea. I unwittingly left a bad omen for Holt perhaps. You wouldn't visit that place twice. After Holt died, I remember thinking, "Serves him right, another sadistic killer of young blokes gone". I shed no tears for either of those cowardly buffoons

The song "I was only nineteen" was a made up story with a catchy tune based on emotion and actual things that can, and do happen in battle. It was nothing more than that. Of course a nineteen year old would be as scared as sh!t walking through a jungle waiting for a bullet with his name on it. The song doesn't say how youngsters can avoid such suicidal situations ... simply don't join the military at that age

There needs to be a song produced for the politicians, called: "We were only 55, as stupid as hell and lying deceitful bastards"









Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:39pm by Bias_2012 »  

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 56770
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #84 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:45pm
 
Good post Bias.

Yes. The Military seduces the young because they are naive and gullible to the lies of their new Masters. Propaganda lies and deceits to prey upon the young to this world.

Better and more honourable to a Military would be to recruit more maturer and older males and females to fight for them. Hell, look at the type of warfare being fought now: no need for 'strength & fitness' but intelligence and life experiences.
Throw in the moral fact that 'young people' have not 'lived' yet in raising kids, business, etc - they have not 'matured' in life. All those young men, who probably haven't experienced 'love' yet - all wasted away as fodder for the Generals who aren't physically tough enough to fight it out among themselves in a Gladiator to the death arena.

If the Military were going to get Politics to just sign a few documents to endorse Enslavement of Civilians and young ones at that. Then they really should be 'stealing' people from the mature spectrum of ages - who have 'lived a life' to some degree and they might even prove to be superior in what they have been enslaved for.

The Military here is still so very 'primitive' in its ways.
Hell, can't even build its own Submarines.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16833
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #85 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:52pm
 
Bias_2012 wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:34pm:
The biggest lie was the "Domino Effect". It was assumed that if we didn't fight the North Vietnamese, communism would spread to Australia, and millions of voters believed it - bloody idiots


Hindsight is 20-20.

In the mid-60s there was nothing idiotic about believing communism would spread across Asia and threaten Australia.

The decade started with the Cuban Missile Crisis, China was an unknown and menacing quantity - the US-China detente had not occurred.

Australians had recently experienced the terror of an almost invasion during WW2 and Britain's abandonment of Australia in its defense.

Violent anti-colonial sentiment was rife throughout all of Southeast Asia's former French, Dutch and British colonies with Australia perceived by these nations as an aider and abetter of imperial powers.

In the '60s, communism's spread to Australia didn't just appear possible, it appeared inevitable.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 56770
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #86 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:59pm
 
Nihon had no intention to invade Australia.
It knew it was no threat to it - alone.
But it did give Australia a kick up the arse for helping its more threatening enemies it was in conflict with directly.
Nothing more than propaganda paranoia from the American point of view.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16833
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #87 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 1:06pm
 
Jasin wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:59pm:
Nihon had no intention to invade Australia.
It knew it was no threat to it - alone.
But it did give Australia a kick up the arse for helping its more threatening enemies it was in conflict with directly.
Nothing more than propaganda paranoia from the American point of view.

More revisionism.

The bombing of Darwin was proof enough that the Japanese could reach Australia and caused Curtin to prepare to abandon the defense of northern Australia in favour of defending the south.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #88 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 2:10pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 1:06pm:
Jasin wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:59pm:
Nihon had no intention to invade Australia.
It knew it was no threat to it - alone.
But it did give Australia a kick up the arse for helping its more threatening enemies it was in conflict with directly.
Nothing more than propaganda paranoia from the American point of view.

More revisionism.

The bombing of Darwin was proof enough that the Japanese could reach Australia and caused Curtin to prepare to abandon the defense of northern Australia in favour of defending the south.


*SIGH* One of the great myths of World War II again rears it's ugly head again.  Japan was incapable of invading Australia.  Australia was basically too far from Japan's bases and the Japanese had no understanding of modern Logistics.  They might have been able to land a force in Australia but they lacked the ability of supplying such a force and moving it across several thousand kilometres of arid bush to the population centres.  The Japanese understood this. 

In 1942 they held a rare joint planning conference about where they were going next.  The Imperial Japanese Navy, gripped with "Victory Disease" wanted to stage an invasion of Australia.  The Imperial Japanese Army asked difficult questions about ships, did the Navy have sufficient to supply them with their needs?  Were their sufficient to protect their invasion force?  Did the Navy have more land transport to help them get across Australia?  The conversation became so heated that subordinates traded blows.  Basically the conference went no where and by the time it ended Midway had happened and the Japanese were no longer a viable threat. 

As it was, they regularly lied to themselves about what was required to achieve their objectives.  They lied about what forces were required, how many porters they needed and what was available in PNG.  They starved because there was way too few.  So more than likely they would have lied about an invasion of Australia.

Australia is a vast continent.  It had a relatively small population.  A population that was frightened about the possibility of a foreign invasion, usually of an Asian power.  They feared first a Chinese invasion and then later a Japanese one, then a Communist inspired one.  The DLP rode on the coattails of the fears invoked by the "Domino Theory" with images of red fingers reach from China down through Malaysia and Indonesia to Australia.  Like the Japanese it was a myth, engendered by fears of the "Yellow Peril" which we see nowadays in Pauline Hanson's utterances.  China, like Japan has no plans for Australia.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10766
Gender: male
Re: I Was Only Nineteen - New Release
Reply #89 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 2:11pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Dec 10th, 2023 at 12:52pm:
In the '60s, communism's spread to Australia didn't just appear possible, it appeared inevitable.


To fools it did, yes

The fear of the spread of communism to Australia was a false perception with no concrete evidence that it could become a reality. The fear was whipped up by East European migrants and Menzies and his sycophant Holt. They just wanted to join the Yanks and help them out. We still do that today, under false assumptions to trick the voters

The Communist party in Australia was so small and insignificant, no one believed it could rise and get elected. Communism was never going to get a foothold in Australia, the notion that it would was ridiculous. As a conscript, I never believed it, nor did thousands of other conscripts. It was all bullshit





Back to top
 

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Send Topic Print