Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Dec 8
th, 2023 at 2:27pm:
History changing to suit a new narrative - all were asked if they would go and those who said YES went.
Modern generation out of touch.
Not according to many veterans that I have asked, Graps. Often officers "volunteered" their units without consultation.
Quote:The Battle of Nui Le, the last battle to involve Australian troops, took place in September 1971. Four days later, Minister for the Army, Andrew Peacock, announced no national servicemen would be required to go to Vietnam if they did not want to go.
[
Source]
Which implies they could be ordered, before that date, to go to South Vietnam, against their will. Tsk, tsk, tsk...

This is further emphasised in the article, which I don't have full access to, called,
"Volunteers with a legal impediment: Australian national service and the question of overseas service in Vietnam" Quote:A close reading of both the historiography and the primary source documents definitively debunks the myth of the volunteer national serviceman in Vietnam, suggesting that veterans cling to this myth to align their Vietnam War experiences with(in) Australia’s Anzac mythology.
This was further detailed in Wikipedia as being:
Quote:The Defence Act was amended May 1964 to provide that national servicemen could be obliged to serve overseas, a provision that had been applied only once before, during World War II. The 1964 amendments applied only to the permanent military forces and excluded the Citizen Military Forces. In 1965, the Defence Act was again amended to require the CMF to serve overseas, which had not been included in the 1964 amendments.[27] In March 1966, the government announced that national servicemen would be sent to South Vietnam to fight in units of the Australian Regular Army and for secondment to American forces.[28] Requirements for overseas service were detailed by the Minister for the Army, Malcolm Fraser, on 13 May 1966.[29]
[
Source]