John Smith wrote on Dec 8
th, 2023 at 2:25pm:
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 8
th, 2023 at 3:51am:
John Smith wrote on Dec 7
th, 2023 at 1:24pm:
ohh, another thread where Geoff complains about something that will never have any affect on him
you're not off pommie origin perchance, are you Geoff
Well, of course this doesn't personally affect me at all John.
But would you agree that it's yet another indicator that
our population—particularly the younger, future, scientists,
teachers, engineers, doctors, politicians etc—are being
dumbed down by this sort of media-led drivel...
Is that your beef? That's she's richer and more applauded than you?
and no, I don't agree that this another indicator of our population dumbing down. There are billions of her fans who would argue that she has enhanced their lives.
You don't have to like who times chooses, but you are fooling yourself if you think she's had zero impact on peoples lives.
No John, I seriously don't give a damn that she's filthy
rich. Most people in the public eye have a lot more
money than me, so I'm certainly not singling Swift out
for that reason alone—or at all in fact.
What I do object to is the obscene amount of money a
singer of modest talent with unremarkable vocal prowess
is effectively ripping off millions of naive, impressionable
tweenie girls the world over.
Driven of course—not by any fabulous talent
per se—but
by a relentless marketing machine that itself sinks
multi-millions of dollars into promoting Swift.
Anyway...
Despite
Time's frequent denials, the designation is often
regarded as an honour and spoken of as an award or prize,
simply based on many previous selections of admirable
people. However, it points out that controversial figures
such as Adolf Hitler (1938); Joseph Stalin (1939 and 1942);
Nikita Khrushchev (1957); Ruhollah Khomeini (1979);
and Rudy Giuliani (2001) were also granted the title for
their impact on world events.
As a result of the public backlash
Time received from its US
readers for naming Khomeini Man of the Year in 1979,
the magazine's editors now shy away from naming people
who're controversial in the United States,
fearing reductions
in sales or advertising revenue.
Time simply nowadays
chooses someone who'll sell lots of copies. End of story.
—It's all about money John, with Swift's talent, or lack
thereof, immaterial.