Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 
Send Topic Print
Defence topics now here. (Read 23317 times)
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 116922
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Defence topics now here.
Reply #285 - Dec 13th, 2025 at 1:56pm
 

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 13th, 2025 at 1:52pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 13th, 2025 at 1:44pm:


Yes: the cost of protection demanded by the mafia US...




Yes - it's a nice country you got there -

it would be a pity if the Chinese invaded.

Give us  $370 billion.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 116922
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Defence topics now here.
Reply #286 - Dec 13th, 2025 at 1:56pm
 
This is a good read thanks to Brian:

https://www.crikey.com.au/2025/12/12/aukus-submarines-cover-up/


Is AUKUS the biggest cover-up in Australian history?


Both British and American officials are saying there are huge problems around their submarine construction programs. But Richard Marles refuses to even talk about AUKUS.

Bernard Keane

Dec 12, 2025


The government’s attempt to portray the US review of AUKUS as a ringing endorsement of the deal has barely survived a week.

The review itself has not been released, and Labor’s village idiot for defence, Richard Marles, has repeatedly refused to answer questions about its contents, other than to parrot Donald Trump in saying it was “full steam ahead” with AUKUS as he and Foreign Minister Penny Wong headed to Washington for their annual meeting with their US counterparts. Pete Hegseth and Marco Rubio were also rather tight-lipped. As Greg Sheridan — in a savage demolition of AUKUS this week — noted, the speed with which Hegseth and Rubio bailed out of the AUSMIN media conference in Washington was startling.

continues ..................................
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 116922
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: some Defence topics now here.
Reply #287 - Feb 3rd, 2026 at 5:33pm
 
We lost a lot of money when we bulldozed our F-111s into the ground.
I'm sure some other country would have loved to have had all of them.
I'm also sure that many RAAF boys would have liked to go overseas
to help with maintenance too -
I bet many lost their jobs when the F-111 was gone or
at a minimum their valuable experience was thrown away.




https://theaviationgeekclub.com/heres-why-australia-buried-23-f-111s-after-the-a...

Australia buried 23 F-111s after the aircraft’s retirement.
No one wanted to see the veterans of the RAAF come to such an end,
it was a requirement of Australian military arrangement with the US that they be securely disposed of.





The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) operated the General Dynamics F-111C,
which had a maximum service ceiling of approximately 60,000 feet (18,200 meters)
to over 66,000 feet (20,000 meters) depending on the configuration.
Known for high-altitude, high-speed performance,
it could reach Mach 2.5 above 50,000 feet.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 116922
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: some Defence topics now here.
Reply #288 - Feb 3rd, 2026 at 5:35pm
 

Mach 2.5 Velocity

At standard sea level conditions, a velocity of Mach 2.5 is approximately 1,903 mph (3,063 km/h or 851 m/s).

How far is Iran from Israel border to border?
The distance between Iran and Israel is about 1,300km to 1,500km (800-930 miles).

Therefore it could fly all the way from Iran to Israel in 30 minutes.   Shocked
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 
Send Topic Print