Australian Politics Forum - Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?

Sophia

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10133

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #15 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 7:18am

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:55pm:

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:43pm:

Not all of them.... and the Gaels coming from the Fertile Crescent would have been brown...

Remember these are Gaels - not the mixed Irish you see these days with Viking, Norman, Danish and such... Doyles - Dubhghaill - are 'Dark Strangers' - Danish in fact ......

Still the Pyramids are another story.
Some blocks of stone were so accurately fitted that
you can't slide a razor blade between the stones.
Could we even build such a structure today?

Apparently not! And certainly not with the same accuracy.
It makes me wonder about these world wonders…..how there existed ancient intelligent civilisations over the ages. Why should we humans alive in the here and now consider ourselves more intelligent to date?
Different smart … not same smart as in past… which is baffling to us to work out or even replicate.
Long lost knowledge.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 22008
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #16 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 8:16am

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:13pm:

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:08pm:

60,000 years ago the Aborigines had the nullah-nullah and the proto-Europeans only had the club!! Darkies ARE more advanced!!

The first large structures came out of North Africa -
the Pyramids in Egypt - 5,000 years ago -
so the darkies were more advanced than us at one stage.

The ancient Egyptians were more closely related to Europeans than sub-Saharan Africans

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

AusGeoff Gold Member Offline Sage of Gippsland Posts: 6025 Victoria Gender:	Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies? Reply #17 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:17am The Australian aborigines invented the returning boomerang, or rotating wing, 50,000 years ago. Such a command of complex aerodynamics and physics certainly puts the numerous racists here on the back foot.
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 123036
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #18 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:21am

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:17am:

The Australian aborigines invented the returning
boomerang, or rotating wing, 50,000 years ago.

Such a command of complex aerodynamics and
physics certainly puts the numerous racists here
on the back foot.

The Abbos did very little farming and they built no cities.
They used to mostly slash and burn the bush to get tucker -
picking up poor burnt animals to eat.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 22008
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #19 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:53am

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:17am:

The Australian aborigines invented the returning
boomerang, or rotating wing, 50,000 years ago.

Such a command of complex aerodynamics and
physics certainly puts the numerous racists here
on the back foot.

What a load of utter garbage.

My 6 year old can make awesome paper aeroplanes.
Do you think he has a complex command of aerodynamics and
physics?

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 62415
Here
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #20 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 10:08am

Gordon wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:53am:

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:17am:

The Australian aborigines invented the returning
boomerang, or rotating wing, 50,000 years ago.

Such a command of complex aerodynamics and
physics certainly puts the numerous racists here
on the back foot.

What a load of utter garbage.

My 6 year old can make awesome paper aeroplanes.
Do you think he has a complex command of aerodynamics and
physics?

He is constructing what you showed him, 50,000 years ago he didn't even have paper. At that point your forbearers may have resembled a cockroach if this evolution theory is correct. It would make sense.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 62415
Here
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #21 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 10:19am

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:13pm:

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:08pm:

60,000 years ago the Aborigines had the nullah-nullah and the proto-Europeans only had the club!! Darkies ARE more advanced!!

The first large structures came out of North Africa -
the Pyramids in Egypt - 5,000 years ago -
so the darkies were more advanced than us at one stage.

They were not more advanced than us they were us.

This story is saying that there was a type of ape in Europe before Humans existed in Africa. This ape is not the type of ape that Humans developed from it is just a step on the way. The theory goes on to say that this ape likely migrated to Africa where Humans first appeared. This bit is not under contention.

Humans first appearing from Africa is not questioned it has just been pointed out that an ape that may have migrated to Africa once lived in europe. This ape may or may not (most likely not based on its genetics) have had something to do with the human linage.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 22008
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #22 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 11:55am

Dnarever wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 10:08am:

Gordon wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:53am:

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:17am:

The Australian aborigines invented the returning
boomerang, or rotating wing, 50,000 years ago.

Such a command of complex aerodynamics and
physics certainly puts the numerous racists here
on the back foot.

What a load of utter garbage.

My 6 year old can make awesome paper aeroplanes.
Do you think he has a complex command of aerodynamics and
physics?

He is constructing what you showed him, 50,000 years ago he didn't even have paper. At that point your forbearers may have resembled a cockroach if this evolution theory is correct. It would make sense.

They worked out shaving different surfaces on a stick caused lift.
Do you really think that equals a complex command of aerodynamics and physics?

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 62415
Here
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #23 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 12:24pm

Gordon wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 11:55am:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 10:08am:

Gordon wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:53am:

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:17am:

The Australian aborigines invented the returning
boomerang, or rotating wing, 50,000 years ago.

Such a command of complex aerodynamics and
physics certainly puts the numerous racists here
on the back foot.

What a load of utter garbage.

My 6 year old can make awesome paper aeroplanes.
Do you think he has a complex command of aerodynamics and
physics?

He is constructing what you showed him, 50,000 years ago he didn't even have paper. At that point your forbearers may have resembled a cockroach if this evolution theory is correct. It would make sense.

They worked out shaving different surfaces on a stick caused lift.
Do you really think that equals a complex command of aerodynamics and physics?

Doubt that you would have worked it out.

They obviously understood the principle of flight and also managed to build in a simple remote control / auto return system.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 62415
Here
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #24 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 12:26pm

Gordon wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 11:55am:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 10:08am:

Gordon wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:53am:

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:17am:

The Australian aborigines invented the returning
boomerang, or rotating wing, 50,000 years ago.

Such a command of complex aerodynamics and
physics certainly puts the numerous racists here
on the back foot.

What a load of utter garbage.

My 6 year old can make awesome paper aeroplanes.
Do you think he has a complex command of aerodynamics and
physics?

He is constructing what you showed him, 50,000 years ago he didn't even have paper. At that point your forbearers may have resembled a cockroach if this evolution theory is correct. It would make sense.

They worked out shaving different surfaces on a stick caused lift.
Do you really think that equals a complex command of aerodynamics and physics?

The first step that everyone else has built on.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 123036
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #25 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 12:30pm

Dnarever wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 10:19am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:13pm:

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:08pm:

60,000 years ago the Aborigines had the nullah-nullah and the proto-Europeans only had the club!! Darkies ARE more advanced!!

The first large structures came out of North Africa -
the Pyramids in Egypt - 5,000 years ago -
so the darkies were more advanced than us at one stage.

They were not more advanced than us they were us.

This story is saying that there was a type of ape in Europe before Humans existed in Africa. This ape is not the type of ape that Humans developed from it is just a step on the way. The theory goes on to say that this ape likely migrated to Africa where Humans first appeared. This bit is not under contention.

Humans first appearing from Africa is not questioned it has just been pointed out that an ape that may have migrated to Africa once lived in europe. This ape may or may not (most likely not based on its genetics) have had something to do with the human linage.

Do you think darkies are closer to the apes than white people?

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 62415
Here
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #26 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 12:41pm

Bobby. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 12:30pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 10:19am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:13pm:

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2023 at 10:08pm:

60,000 years ago the Aborigines had the nullah-nullah and the proto-Europeans only had the club!! Darkies ARE more advanced!!

The first large structures came out of North Africa -
the Pyramids in Egypt - 5,000 years ago -
so the darkies were more advanced than us at one stage.

They were not more advanced than us they were us.

This story is saying that there was a type of ape in Europe before Humans existed in Africa. This ape is not the type of ape that Humans developed from it is just a step on the way. The theory goes on to say that this ape likely migrated to Africa where Humans first appeared. This bit is not under contention.

Humans first appearing from Africa is not questioned it has just been pointed out that an ape that may have migrated to Africa once lived in europe. This ape may or may not (most likely not based on its genetics) have had something to do with the human linage.

Do you think darkies are closer to the apes than white people?

No, The difference is that the white races moved and lived in the north for long enough that there was a pigment change. There is no argument for a biological superiority based on colour either way. The difference was driven by environment not biology or development. It is the same race developed at the same time. We were likely all darker in the beginning, I don't know what shade.

Whiteness may be a darwinian effect.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 123036
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #27 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 12:46pm

Dnarever wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 12:41pm:

No, The difference is that the white races moved and lived in the north for long enough that there was a pigment change. There is no argument for a biological superiority based on colour either way. The difference was driven by environment not biology or development. It is the same race developed at the same time. We were likely all darker in the beginning, I don't know what shade.

Whiteness may be a darwinian effect.

Ummm - you could probably argue that the Chinese are the furthest from the apes.
They seem to do better at Universities on average compared with everyone else.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 22008
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies?
Reply #28 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 12:46pm

Dnarever wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 12:26pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 11:55am:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 10:08am:

Gordon wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:53am:

AusGeoff wrote on Sep 4^th, 2023 at 9:17am:

The Australian aborigines invented the returning
boomerang, or rotating wing, 50,000 years ago.

Such a command of complex aerodynamics and
physics certainly puts the numerous racists here
on the back foot.

What a load of utter garbage.

My 6 year old can make awesome paper aeroplanes.
Do you think he has a complex command of aerodynamics and
physics?

He is constructing what you showed him, 50,000 years ago he didn't even have paper. At that point your forbearers may have resembled a cockroach if this evolution theory is correct. It would make sense.

They worked out shaving different surfaces on a stick caused lift.
Do you really think that equals a complex command of aerodynamics and physics?

The first step that everyone else has built on.

You're an idiot of the first order.
There's a direct line from kites and sails to aeronautical wings.
Ever sailed? A sail is exactly the same as an aeronautical wing, in use for at least 5 thousand years before a boomerang was sighted.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 4^th, 2023 at 1:07pm by Gordon »

IBI

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 53500 At my desk.	Re: Maybe we didn't evolve from darkies? Reply #29 - Sep 4^th, 2023 at 3:31pm Quote: A sail is exactly the same as an aeronautical wing, in use for at least 5 thousand years before a boomerang was sighted. The one that acts as a wing is a fairly recent invention I think.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged