Dnarever wrote on Sep 9
th, 2023 at 6:55pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 9
th, 2023 at 10:26am:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 9
th, 2023 at 10:25am:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 8
th, 2023 at 11:51pm:
Jasin wrote on Sep 8
th, 2023 at 11:49pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 8
th, 2023 at 11:09pm:
Dnarever wrote on Sep 8
th, 2023 at 11:02pm:
You do know that Trump has been indicted 4 times with a couple more on the way. He really does have significant legal charges as do most of his crime family. This comes after he clearly got away with decades of criminal activity.
Yet here you are jumping up and down about Joe Biden where there isn't even a credible accusation let alone any evidence.
Look - I'm fed up with serving all the evidence to you guys on a plate
then to have it poo pooed.
It's time you searched for it yourself.
They can't - they're retarded.
Take Gordo and Lisa doing their research while Mothra and Smith were left looking like 'Five Dogs' indeed.
They waste my time as no matter what I find it's never good enough for them.
You know you have a problem when the stuff you find has less credibility than the stuff that the republicans just make up and is stuff that the Republicans refuse to use
What standard of evidence would be good enough to convince you
that Biden is running a crime family?
How about something the republicans could use to legitimately open an impeachment or something that Biden could be charged with and face indictment ? You know serious real evidence.
I have no problem with anyone being charged of something if they have done wrong.
Good point, Dnarever. Let's ask Bobby if he feels the same way.
Bobby, do you have a problem with any politicians being charged, say, for stealing government secrets, keeping them on the stage of a wedding venue, refusing to hand them over to the FBI after a subpoena and flying them around the country to avoid handing them back?
How about political candidates who, after they lose their election, call up election officials and demand more votes? Who, when asked for proof of their victory, refer to the size of audiences at their rallies, which they've overinflated? Who conspired to have fake electoral delegates sworn in to vote against the number of ballots counted, breaking multiple state election laws in multiple states?
What about speakers at political rallies who start a riot by inciting a mob of over a hundred thousand people to march to the Capitol and go wild? What of those who, when informed members of the mob had been found carrying guns, told his security to let them through as they weren't there to shoot
him? What if the same person sat in their office for over four hours while their supporters went wild, attacked police and broke into parliament? Who watched this on TV, ate his lunch, took calls and recieved texts from dozens of political colleagues who hid under their desks with their lives at risk, begging him to call reinforcements in, which he refused to do?
What if you knew his supporters recieved up to 22 years in jail for their role in plotting a violent insurrection which he himself had encouraged and participated in planning? What if you knew he had considered multiple options to stay in power, including a violent, armed rebellion and a military coup?
What if you knew the evidence of the above crimes had been through four grand juries and included recordings, footage and even confessions of his crimes? What if his own Attorney General, a former hero of yours, called him dead to rights and offered to testify to this in court?
Would you have a problem with someone who had done all that being charged?