|
Frank
|
Brian Ross wrote on Aug 21 st, 2023 at 8:26pm: Frank wrote on Aug 21 st, 2023 at 5:34pm: Brian Ross wrote on Aug 21 st, 2023 at 4:54pm: Frank wrote on Aug 21 st, 2023 at 4:49pm: Brian Ross wrote on Aug 21 st, 2023 at 3:55pm: Frank wrote on Aug 21 st, 2023 at 1:35pm: Brian Ross wrote on Aug 21 st, 2023 at 12:49pm: Pauline Hanson was disendorsed as a Liberal candidate back in 1996, "after making contentious comments about Aboriginal Australians,"[ Source] Those "contentious comments" were that "she advocated the abolition of special government assistance for Aboriginal Australians, and she was disendorsed by the Liberal Party."[ Source] All matters which she now glosses over in her diatribe against Indigenous Australians. She went on further state, once elected in her Maiden Speech, "I won the seat of Oxley largely on an issue that has resulted in me being called a racist. That issue related to my comment that Aboriginals received more benefits than non-Aboriginals". Hanson then asserted that Australia was in danger of being "swamped by Asians", and that these immigrants "have their own culture and religion, form ghettos and do not assimilate".[ Source] Tsk, tsk, tsk... And?? It disproves your claim that I am supposely: Frank wrote on Aug 21 st, 2023 at 10:18am: You are lying, of course, shifty ponce. Such a silly comment but hey, it is all we have come to expect from your, Soren. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Hanson 'glossed over' nothing. Opposing the Voice or Aboriginal special treatment is not a 'diatribe. Her warnings of the negative consequences of large scale unassimilating immigration have proven true. No personal history has been rewritten, amazingly or otherwise. There was never a time 'she refused to to have anything to do with Indigineous Australians'. Total, barefaced Bbwianesque lies. How unsurprising, you swallow her propaganda wholeheartedy, don't you? Hardly unsurprising considering your Racist viewpoint on most things. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Which bit surprised you? Which bit was 'amazingly rewritten'? Your OWN emotive, propagandistic language is not evidence of anything - and we know how much you love asking OTHERS for evidence, don't we? She rewrote her personal history regarding Indigenous Australians, as I have shown. Tsk, tsk, tsk... You are lying. She rewrote nothing and you showed nothing of the sort. You are a fantasist and an inventor of fantasies.
|