Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17
Send Topic Print
If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing. (Read 7365 times)
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #60 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 4:32am
 
FD—do you think it right that people who provide not a single new dwelling should get a huge tax cut?

Are cats critters, FD?
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53355
At my desk.
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #61 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 4:37am
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 4:32am:
FD—do you think it right that people who provide not a single new dwelling should get a huge tax cut?

Are cats critters, FD?


What do you mean by a "tax cut" Monk? Are you proposing a new tax on everyone who isn't a builder?

Do you think it is a good idea for the tax department to send people bankrupt by giving them a hug tax bill in a year in which they actually lose money?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #62 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 6:07am
 
Builder? People who negative gear buy an existing dwelling! Why should they get a tax cut for that? Do they actually buy an existing swelling for the sake of the tax cut NG gives? Then the second tax cut when they sell the existing dwelling and pay a very reduced capital gains tax!

Are cats critters, FD? You seem reluctant to answer for some reason.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53355
At my desk.
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #63 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 6:13am
 
Quote:
Why should they get a tax cut for that?


It's not a tax cut Monk. They are taxed on the same principle as any business owner, investor or employee. The reason for this will be obvious if you can give a straight answer to this simple question:

Do you think it is a good idea for the tax department to send people bankrupt by giving them a hug tax bill in a year in which they actually lose money?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #64 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 6:16am
 
Nobody is forcing them to buy an existing property and I see no reason they should get TWO tax cuts for doing so.

Are cats critters FD? You still have not answered!
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53355
At my desk.
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #65 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 6:54am
 
Do you think it is a good idea for the tax department to send people bankrupt by giving them a hug tax bill in a year in which they actually lose money?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #66 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 8:24am
 
They should limit NG to the first investment property only. After that you're on your own
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #67 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 8:36am
 
freediver wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 6:54am:
Do you think it is a good idea for the tax department to send people bankrupt by giving them a huge tax bill in a year in which they actually lose money?


Ouch! Monk gets pwned....again.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Sir lastnail
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30923
Gender: male
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #68 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 9:44am
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 8:24am:
They should limit NG to the first investment property only. After that you're on your own


Better still, limit it to brand new house packages and which will increase supply and stop them using that as a throwaway line in any of these debates. Wink

Of course unless they don't want to increase supply in order to keep the value of their investments high Wink
Back to top
 

"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #69 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 9:54am
 
Sir lastnail wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 9:44am:
John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 8:24am:
They should limit NG to the first investment property only. After that you're on your own


Better still, limit it to brand new house packages and which will increase supply and stop them using that as a throwaway line in any of these debates. Wink

Of course unless they don't want to increase supply in order to keep the value of their investments high Wink


Negative gearing and brand new houses? Well that’s something which is available right now.

So now that you’re here please explain to everyone why you haven’t cashed in your share portfolio and used those funds to put your money where your big mouth is?
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #70 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 10:46am
 
If they make that big a loss buying an existing property maybe they should forget about it and do something else.

TWO tax cuts for buying then selling an existing dwelling, ridiculous!
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #71 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 11:31am
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 9:54am:
Sir lastnail wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 9:44am:
John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 8:24am:
They should limit NG to the first investment property only. After that you're on your own


Better still, limit it to brand new house packages and which will increase supply and stop them using that as a throwaway line in any of these debates. Wink

Of course unless they don't want to increase supply in order to keep the value of their investments high Wink


Negative gearing and brand new houses? Well that’s something which is available right now.

So now that you’re here please explain to everyone why you haven’t cashed in your share portfolio and used those funds to put your money where your big mouth is?


Oh look everyone - Last Nail logged off. Good. It will give him time to think before he posts further rubbish in this topic.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #72 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 11:49am
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 10:46am:
If they make that big a loss buying an existing property maybe they should forget about it and do something else.

TWO tax cuts for buying then selling an existing dwelling, ridiculous!


Here we go .... another dildo of a dick with no experience AND no idea about real estate investment.

Look everyone ... Drunk has seen fit to talk utter cr@p again.

Ok ... Drunk let’s look at your pitiful half baked idea for a second. How the hell do you expect ANY person to know if he/she will make a loss/make a profit/break even at some point in the future when they invest in any market?? There are no guarantees! Especially in this day and age!

So tell everyone what crystal ball you have there that’s obviously made you feel like you could expect such a thing from others (who unlike you have worked, have paid taxes and have invested in real estate without waiting for a handout by a parent they lived with for free all their lives).

Seriously Drunk...you can’t keep up in topics and it’s not JUST due to the fact that you’re old and you have long term health issues wrt alcohol. You also lack life experience and it shows. It’s getting annoying because in many topics we have to stop to explain the bleeding obvious before we can move on whenever you (or that uneducated and ignorant tosspot Frodo) is around. Perhaps you should start a forum that caters for people like you ie slower, older, uneducated and ignorant. Oh wait ... you already have one. My bad 😐
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Sir lastnail
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30923
Gender: male
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #73 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 12:28pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 11:31am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 9:54am:
Sir lastnail wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 9:44am:
John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 8:24am:
They should limit NG to the first investment property only. After that you're on your own


Better still, limit it to brand new house packages and which will increase supply and stop them using that as a throwaway line in any of these debates. Wink

Of course unless they don't want to increase supply in order to keep the value of their investments high Wink


Negative gearing and brand new houses? Well that’s something which is available right now.

So now that you’re here please explain to everyone why you haven’t cashed in your share portfolio and used those funds to put your money where your big mouth is?


Oh look everyone - Last Nail logged off. Good. It will give him time to think before he posts further rubbish in this topic.


I don't have a share portfolio. And I ask again what is the problem with LIMITING NG to brand new house and land packages so you can still buy the old dumps but you just won't have a competitive advantage over owner occupiers who can't benefit from generous tax concessions. SO I ask again what is the problem with that ?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 23rd, 2023 at 12:42pm by Sir lastnail »  

"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: If they are hell bent on keeping negative gearing.
Reply #74 - Jun 23rd, 2023 at 2:37pm
 
Sir lastnail wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 9:44am:
John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2023 at 8:24am:
They should limit NG to the first investment property only. After that you're on your own


Better still, limit it to brand new house packages and which will increase supply and stop them using that as a throwaway line in any of these debates. Wink

Of course unless they don't want to increase supply in order to keep the value of their investments high Wink


nah .. investor bring old houses back to life. You'd be the first to cry if you had to rent an old wreck
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17
Send Topic Print