Australian Politics Forum - Ivermectin and cancer study papers

Carl D

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10695
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #30 - Feb 28^th, 2025 at 12:33am

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 26^th, 2025 at 10:45pm:

Quote:

Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News
@KashPatel_News

Assasinated Japanese P.M. didn’t follow WEF orders. Didn’t mandate vaccines, sent 1.6 Million doses back and gave citizens ivermectin. Make sense now?

https://x.com/KashPatel_News/status/1894471143630700802

The Japanese were the first to say covid was aerosol after Diamond Princess ship outbreak.

Passengers were locked in their cabins isolated from everyone while covid spread through air conditioning.

It took the CDC nearly 2 years to admit covid was aerosol, our RACGP were questioning this for quite some time.

Washing your hands and social distancing do nothing to stop aerosol spread of virus.

Well done, Baron.

It took nearly 5 years but you finally got there.

But, do you know what does go a long way towards stopping Covid, flu and other respiratory viruses?

Masks. They provide protection against all viruses and all variants of said viruses.

And I don't mean 'baggy blue' surgicals (although they are better than nothing).

Next thing we need to work on is trying to find out why masks are considered to be the equivalent of poison in Australia and most western countries.

Perhaps we should ask our governments and big business that question (assuming we can ever break through their 'vow of silence' regarding everything Covid related these days despite the fact that Covid is still about 10 times more deadly than the flu).

When "bird flu" goes full blown human to human transmission (if it hasn't already) and maintains it's current 50% CFR (Case Fatality Rate) perhaps governments may grow a spine and start talking about masks again because handwashing and social distancing won't cut it with this... same as with Covid and the flu, etc.

Oh, and...

Quote:

It took the CDC nearly 2 years to admit covid was aerosol, our RACGP were questioning this for quite some time.

Yes.

But, as long as governments and business refuse to admit that Covid and other respiratory viruses are airborne it places responsibilty (aquascoot's awesome "personal responsibility") on the individual.

An admission that Covid is airborne would require governments and business to do something about it, i.e. have to spend some serious money on things like providing clean air in all public buildings same as the pollies now have at Parliament House in Canberra and probably all of the State ones as well.

Back to top

** Repeat Covid infections exercise our immune system in the same way that repeat concussions exercise our brain **

IP Logged

Yadda

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 22689
A cat with a view

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #31 - Feb 28^th, 2025 at 7:45am

The title of this thread is.......

"Ivermectin and cancer study papers"

Quote:

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug.

......

wiki

It doesn't matter what beneficial influence a drug like Ivermectin could have upon 100's millions of people.......
......if the medical establishment [including BIGPHARMA] and their lobbyists,
tell our governments,
that they do not want you to have access to Ivermectin [....because Ivermectin is an 'off patent' drug],
then.......you/we cannot have access to it.

And that, is all there is to it.

That, despite the fact that before 'the pandemic',
IVERMECTIN had been 'promoted' by the World Health Organization,
as being on its own list of 'essential medicines'.

And, it has been estimated that since the 1980's,
around 8 billion doses of Ivermectin have been dispensed [without incident ? ]
in many 3rd world countries.

AND THERE'S MORE......

Quote:

Is there a cure for anti-Trump disease?: Devine

By Miranda Devine
Published Aug. 9, 2020

......
We really should create a Krugman Rule of economics to celebrate his record of getting everything wrong.

But he was right about the oppositional disorder of Trump-haters. Their determination to refute the president’s every word is having a perverse effect on America’s ability to respond to the coronavirus.

The most damaging recent example is the politicization of the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine.

The instant Trump touted it as a promising treatment for COVID-19 at a March 19 press conference, the media bent over backward to deride him as a quack and discredit the drug.

What makes the hydroxychloroquine story more sinister is that the negative publicity played right into the hands of Big Pharma, whose lobbyists background susceptible journalists, members of Congress and their staffs to advance their interests.

The pharmaceutical-industrial complex doesn’t like cheap off-patent drugs such as hydroxychloroquine because they don’t provide huge profits in the way that new drugs and vaccines do.

.......
.......

And that brings us to another cheap off-patent drug
that has been around for half a century,
has been used safely to treat parasitic infections, from lice to river blindness,
and also is on the World Health Organization list of essential medicines: IVERMECTIN.

Australian gastroenterologist Thomas Borody has found ivermectin is a promising treatment for COVID-19 when combined in a “triple therapy” with zinc and the antibiotic doxycycline.

He calls it a “wonder drug” but said last week that the trick is “treating patients very early.”

Borody is famous for his triple therapy for the bacterial infection that causes peptic ulcers, Helicobacter pylori.

Clinical trials on his ivermectin triple therapy are about to start in California and are underway in 32 other countries.

But results using the drug off-label have been promising.

In Bangladesh, 400 patients with mild to moderate symptoms were treated and 98 percent cleared the virus within four to 14 days.

In the Dominican Republic, in 1,300 patients the average duration of infection fell from 21 days to 10 days.

......

https://nypost.com/2020/08/09/is-there-a-cure-for-anti-trump-disease-devine/

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 28^th, 2025 at 7:53am by Yadda »

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20426
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #32 - Mar 3^rd, 2026 at 11:35pm

Quote:

NIH
@NIH

5:20 AM · Feb 11, 2026

Ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone discovered in the mid-1970’s, plays a critical role in the treatment of a wide range of parasitic diseases in humans as well as in veterinary practice. Over the past decade, researchers have explored repurposing this molecule as an anticancer agent following the 2015 Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of ivermectin by a researcher who pioneered the concept of looking for uses beyond antibiotics for biological activity in microorganisms. @theNCIis currently funding intramural research for this purpose.

https://x.com/NIH/status/2021288242155225263

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Baronvonrort Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20426 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers Reply #33 - Mar 3^rd, 2026 at 11:38pm Quote: STAT @statnews The National Cancer Institute is studying ivermectin as a potential cancer treatment, according to its top official, alarming career scientists. https://x.com/statnews/status/2021184425086570923
Back to top	Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it. IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37457
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #34 - Mar 4^th, 2026 at 9:28am

It is something that would be worth studying
As has been pointed out it will not be studied by big pharmaceutical companies as there is $0 to be made off an old drugWith no potential for a patent.

For those who are failing to keep up
There is an enormous amount of research being done on the microbiome
You have almost 300 times as many bacteria in your body as you have human cells
In effect a human is a life support system for a bacterial flora mainly in the bowel

Google it if you like but the barrierOf the bowel wall
The interaction between bowel The interaction between bowel Chemicals Brian chemicals and the immune system are incredibly ancient and important

If ivermectin affects bowel flora which it certainly does, it could be helping good bacteria or harming good bacteria but there will be an affect on health mood and immune function.

A few interesting side notes.

Sauerkraut and Kim chi which are fermented favour good bacteria raise serotonin reduce cancer risk.

Mouth washes tend to kill healthy bacteria and have the opposite effect

High fructose corn syrup, a sedentary job, breathing exercises which affect the vagus nerve, the main nerve of the bowel, cold water immersion which similarly affects this nerve, length of sleep, all affect bowel flora and the symbiotic organism that is a human being.

In the gastro clinics around Australia, you can have a Medicare funded transplant of good feces from a healthy person to aid your immune system.

So I wouldn't be writing off ivermectin just because the big pharma vested interests want to keep selling you harmful antibiotics, statins anti depressants gastric reflux drugs and ozemoic and refuse to study more common sense but non profitable options

Back to top

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101241

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #35 - Mar 4^th, 2026 at 3:01pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 4^th, 2026 at 9:28am:

It is something that would be worth studying
As has been pointed out it will not be studied by big pharmaceutical companies as there is $0 to be made off an old drugWith no potential for a patent.

For those who are failing to keep up
There is an enormous amount of research being done on the microbiome
You have almost 300 times as many bacteria in your body as you have human cells
In effect a human is a life support system for a bacterial flora mainly in the bowel

Google it if you like but the barrierOf the bowel wall
The interaction between bowel The interaction between bowel Chemicals Brian chemicals and the immune system are incredibly ancient and important

If ivermectin affects bowel flora which it certainly does, it could be helping good bacteria or harming good bacteria but there will be an affect on health mood and immune function.

A few interesting side notes.

Sauerkraut and Kim chi which are fermented favour good bacteria raise serotonin reduce cancer risk.

Mouth washes tend to kill healthy bacteria and have the opposite effect

High fructose corn syrup, a sedentary job, breathing exercises which affect the vagus nerve, the main nerve of the bowel, cold water immersion which similarly affects this nerve, length of sleep, all affect bowel flora and the symbiotic organism that is a human being.

In the gastro clinics around Australia, you can have a Medicare funded transplant of good feces from a healthy person to aid your immune system.

So I wouldn't be writing off ivermectin just because the big pharma vested interests want to keep selling you harmful antibiotics, statins anti depressants gastric reflux drugs and ozemoic and refuse to study more common sense but non profitable options

Of course there's potential for a patent. If Ivermectin was found to cure covid - or anything else for that matter - it would immediately be relabelled and patented as a treatment. Drug companies do this all the time.

It's what most drug patent applications are: relabelled drugs.

They're even willing to change a drug molecule ever so slightly to patent for the same treatment.

Thalidomide was one such drug, originally a tranquilizer patented for morning sickness.

Whoops.

Shurely shome mishtake, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37457
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #36 - Mar 4^th, 2026 at 3:55pm

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 4^th, 2026 at 3:01pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 4^th, 2026 at 9:28am:

It is something that would be worth studying
As has been pointed out it will not be studied by big pharmaceutical companies as there is $0 to be made off an old drugWith no potential for a patent.

For those who are failing to keep up
There is an enormous amount of research being done on the microbiome
You have almost 300 times as many bacteria in your body as you have human cells
In effect a human is a life support system for a bacterial flora mainly in the bowel

Google it if you like but the barrierOf the bowel wall
The interaction between bowel The interaction between bowel Chemicals Brian chemicals and the immune system are incredibly ancient and important

If ivermectin affects bowel flora which it certainly does, it could be helping good bacteria or harming good bacteria but there will be an affect on health mood and immune function.

A few interesting side notes.

Sauerkraut and Kim chi which are fermented favour good bacteria raise serotonin reduce cancer risk.

Mouth washes tend to kill healthy bacteria and have the opposite effect

High fructose corn syrup, a sedentary job, breathing exercises which affect the vagus nerve, the main nerve of the bowel, cold water immersion which similarly affects this nerve, length of sleep, all affect bowel flora and the symbiotic organism that is a human being.

In the gastro clinics around Australia, you can have a Medicare funded transplant of good feces from a healthy person to aid your immune system.

So I wouldn't be writing off ivermectin just because the big pharma vested interests want to keep selling you harmful antibiotics, statins anti depressants gastric reflux drugs and ozemoic and refuse to study more common sense but non profitable options

Of course there's potential for a patent. If Ivermectin was found to cure covid - or anything else for that matter - it would immediately be relabelled and patented as a treatment. Drug companies do this all the time.

It's what most drug patent applications are: relabelled drugs.

They're even willing to change a drug molecule ever so slightly to patent for the same treatment.

Thalidomide was one such drug, originally a tranquilizer patented for morning sickness.

Whoops.

Shurely shome mishtake, no?

Incorrect.

They will not be able to make money off it as it is out of patent.
Same goes for penicillin or paracetamol.
You can sell it, but any manufacturer in China or India can also sell it .

This is not the case for new drugs. Like, say , ozempic.
It's why it's 200 dollars a month.
Ivermectin woul likely sell for pennies

Educate yourself

Back to top

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101241

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #37 - Yesterday at 9:34am

aquascoot wrote on Mar 4^th, 2026 at 3:55pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 4^th, 2026 at 3:01pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 4^th, 2026 at 9:28am:

It is something that would be worth studying
As has been pointed out it will not be studied by big pharmaceutical companies as there is $0 to be made off an old drugWith no potential for a patent.

For those who are failing to keep up
There is an enormous amount of research being done on the microbiome
You have almost 300 times as many bacteria in your body as you have human cells
In effect a human is a life support system for a bacterial flora mainly in the bowel

Google it if you like but the barrierOf the bowel wall
The interaction between bowel The interaction between bowel Chemicals Brian chemicals and the immune system are incredibly ancient and important

If ivermectin affects bowel flora which it certainly does, it could be helping good bacteria or harming good bacteria but there will be an affect on health mood and immune function.

A few interesting side notes.

Sauerkraut and Kim chi which are fermented favour good bacteria raise serotonin reduce cancer risk.

Mouth washes tend to kill healthy bacteria and have the opposite effect

High fructose corn syrup, a sedentary job, breathing exercises which affect the vagus nerve, the main nerve of the bowel, cold water immersion which similarly affects this nerve, length of sleep, all affect bowel flora and the symbiotic organism that is a human being.

In the gastro clinics around Australia, you can have a Medicare funded transplant of good feces from a healthy person to aid your immune system.

So I wouldn't be writing off ivermectin just because the big pharma vested interests want to keep selling you harmful antibiotics, statins anti depressants gastric reflux drugs and ozemoic and refuse to study more common sense but non profitable options

Of course there's potential for a patent. If Ivermectin was found to cure covid - or anything else for that matter - it would immediately be relabelled and patented as a treatment. Drug companies do this all the time.

It's what most drug patent applications are: relabelled drugs.

They're even willing to change a drug molecule ever so slightly to patent for the same treatment.

Thalidomide was one such drug, originally a tranquilizer patented for morning sickness.

Whoops.

Shurely shome mishtake, no?

Incorrect.

They will not be able to make money off it as it is out of patent.
Same goes for penicillin or paracetamol.
You can sell it, but any manufacturer in China or India can also sell it .

This is not the case for new drugs. Like, say , ozempic.
It's why it's 200 dollars a month.
Ivermectin woul likely sell for pennies

Educate yourself

Educated.

78% of new drugs are old patents.

Of course, we know you won't read our link and educate yourself, dear. That's what we're here for.

When we inform you of a fact, you'd do best to just say ah.

Doctor knows best, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37457
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #38 - Yesterday at 10:30am

Quite child like aren't you.

If Pfizer decided to " patent" ivermectin and " relabel" it as a covid treatment. Then every other drug company in India China south Africa could do the same and sell it for pennies, destroying any profit.

This is because it is " off patent".

It's why Viagra dropped from 20 dollars a tablet to 1 dollar a tablet after 10 years.
Drug companies can only get a patent for a decade to have zero competition and recoup their research investment.

Pfizers Vax, it's covid drugs like the ones the pbs pays 1500 a course for ,
Lavigrio I think it's called are protected for 10 yrs and cannot be copied.

Ivetmectin being over 10 years old has no such protection.

Educate yourself.

Trump and I are allowed to fib.

Lefties like you are not.

Back to top

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101241

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #39 - Yesterday at 11:14am

aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 10:30am:

Quite child like aren't you.

If Pfizer decided to " patent" ivermectin and " relabel" it as a covid treatment. Then every other drug company in India China south Africa could do the same and sell it for pennies, destroying any profit.

This is because it is " off patent".

It's why Viagra dropped from 20 dollars a tablet to 1 dollar a tablet after 10 years.
Drug companies can only get a patent for a decade to have zero competition and recoup their research investment.

Pfizers Vax, it's covid drugs like the ones the pbs pays 1500 a course for ,
Lavigrio I think it's called are protected for 10 yrs and cannot be copied.

Ivetmectin being over 10 years old has no such protection.

Educate yourself.

Trump and I are allowed to fib.

Lefties like you are not.

Doctors can't prescribe off-label, dear. If Pfizer trialed Ivermectin on covid and took out a patent, it could be given a jolly brand name and prescribed for human consumption, rather than a horse dewormer.

I'm hardly a leftie, but you're right. I do not permit myself the use of fibs.

Despicable stuff.

You're perfectly free to do so yourself, of course, but you'll be caught out every time.

I'm surprised you haven't figured this out yet.

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37457
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #40 - Yesterday at 12:44pm

Educate yourself.

Because you can't take our a patent on a drug over 10 years old ( if you discover and push a NEW discovery you get 10nyears of monopoly ) there is no incentive to bring to market an old drug.

Ivermectin sells for pennies.

You can spend a billion doing research to prove it works and when you then take it to market YOU GET PENNIES.

it's why drug companies bring out a new , ebet so slightly better variant of their drug for diabetes or blood pressure or depression , every 10 years.

Then they bribe the doctors to prescribe it and the government have to pay them billions of dollars and not pennies because no cheap Indian or Chinese company can copy it for a decade.

Then at the end of a decade the cheap copies come out and the big companies have there next generation PATENTED AND PROTECTED slightly different drug.

Are you seriously saying that an Australian company could start producing Ozempic which is now worth more then Apple or Samsung.

No

It under patent.

Ivermectin is not.

Here endeth the lesson

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37457
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #41 - Yesterday at 2:45pm

From a pure business perspective, a drug like Lagevrio (molnupiravir) and a drug like ivermectin have very different profit profiles for pharmaceutical companies. The difference mainly comes down to patents, pricing power, and market structure.
1. Patent status (the biggest factor)
Lagevrio
A newer patented antiviral developed by Merck & Co. with partner Ridgeback.
Patent protection means only the patent holder (or licensed partners) can sell it for a period of time.
This allows the company to set relatively high prices.
Ivermectin
Discovered in the 1970s and originally marketed by Merck.
The patent expired decades ago, so it is now generic.
Many manufacturers can produce it, so the price is very low and margins are thin.
➡️ Result:
Patented drugs tend to be much more profitable per treatment than generics.
2. Price per treatment course
Typical early pandemic estimates:
Lagevrio: about $700 per treatment course in the U.S. government purchase agreements. �
Pharmaceutical Technology +1
Estimated manufacturing cost: roughly ~$17 per course according to some analyses. �
covidinvestigation.info
That means the selling price can be tens of times higher than manufacturing cost, which is common for patented medicines.
By contrast:
Ivermectin: generic tablets may cost a few dollars to tens of dollars for a full course, depending on country and dosage.
Because many manufacturers produce it, no single company can charge a large markup.
3. Total revenues
Patented COVID drugs generated substantial short-term revenue:
Lagevrio: about $2.2 billion in revenue during early pandemic sales. �
Knowledge Center
It also generated $5.7 billion in 2022 before declining later. �
AP News
Merck still reported about $964 million in sales in 2024. �
Merck.com
Ivermectin, by contrast:
Has been sold as a generic for decades.
Revenue is spread across many companies and usually much smaller per company.

So from a pharmaceutical company’s perspective, a new patented drug like Lagevrio can be vastly more profitable than a generic drug like ivermectin, even if both are pills taken orally.
✅ If you want, I can also explain why pharmaceutical companies tend to invest heavily in new patented antivirals instead of repurposing cheap generics—the economics of drug development are interesting and not always intuitive.

Back to top

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101241

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #42 - Yesterday at 5:20pm

aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 12:44pm:

Educate yourself.

Because you can't take our a patent on a drug over 10 years old ( if you discover and push a NEW discovery you get 10nyears of monopoly ) there is no incentive to bring to market an old drug.

Ivermectin sells for pennies.

You can spend a billion doing research to prove it works and when you then take it to market YOU GET PENNIES.

it's why drug companies bring out a new , ebet so slightly better variant of their drug for diabetes or blood pressure or depression , every 10 years.

Then they bribe the doctors to prescribe it and the government have to pay them billions of dollars and not pennies because no cheap Indian or Chinese company can copy it for a decade.

Then at the end of a decade the cheap copies come out and the big companies have there next generation PATENTED AND PROTECTED slightly different drug.

Are you seriously saying that an Australian company could start producing Ozempic which is now worth more then Apple or Samsung.

No

It under patent.

Ivermectin is not.

Here endeth the lesson

Oh, we have, dear. We've posted and sourced it in this very thread. Here's a little more education:

The TGA have listed ivermectin a schedule 4, prescription-only drug

It's a breach of the Therapeutic Goods Act (1989) for doctors to prescribe off-label.

In fact, ivermectin was given a schedule 4 listing to stop people taking it for covid, due to your brainwashed, self-confessed fibs.

Quote:

The restriction on ivermectin was introduced in September 2021 because of concerns about the safety of consumers using ivermectin without health advice to treat COVID-19, widespread use of ivermectin instead of approved vaccines and treatments for COVID-19, and potential shortages of the medicine for approved uses.

So, according to the Therapeutic Goods Administration, there's only one way to prescribe Ivermectin to humans in Australia, as a covid treatment:

Do a double-blind study, prove the efficacy of Ivermectin on covid symptoms, then apply to the TGA.

After that, you'd be patenting your drug for covid treatment and giving it a cunning brand name.

Think, oh I don't know, Covix, Bigdix, Deaeltrix.

That, after all, is how the drug industry works in countries with standards.

Even countries like India have standards. It's just that pharmacists don't always bother to apply them.

This is how we know you've never been prescribed ivermectin yourself. Unless you've been eating your horse's apple-flavoured deworming treatment, it's illegal for doctors to prescribe it for anything other than a topical ointment for head lice, scabies or various parasitic infections.

But look, it's most peculiar, I must say. Here you are telling us to educate ourselves, and you haven't even bothered to do a simple search yourself.

Thanks for the lesson.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Yesterday at 5:35pm by Melanias purse »

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37457
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #43 - Yesterday at 5:34pm

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:20pm:

aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 12:44pm:

Educate yourself.

Because you can't take our a patent on a drug over 10 years old ( if you discover and push a NEW discovery you get 10nyears of monopoly ) there is no incentive to bring to market an old drug.

Ivermectin sells for pennies.

You can spend a billion doing research to prove it works and when you then take it to market YOU GET PENNIES.

it's why drug companies bring out a new , ebet so slightly better variant of their drug for diabetes or blood pressure or depression , every 10 years.

Then they bribe the doctors to prescribe it and the government have to pay them billions of dollars and not pennies because no cheap Indian or Chinese company can copy it for a decade.

Then at the end of a decade the cheap copies come out and the big companies have there next generation PATENTED AND PROTECTED slightly different drug.

Are you seriously saying that an Australian company could start producing Ozempic which is now worth more then Apple or Samsung.

No

It under patent.

Ivermectin is not.

Here endeth the lesson

I told you, I have. Here's more education.

The TGA have listed ivermectin a schedule 4, prescription-only drug

It's a breach of the Therapeutic Goods Act (1989) for doctors to prescribe off-label.

In fact, ivermectin was given a schedule 4 listing to stop people taking it for covid, due to your brainwashed, self-confessed fibs.

Quote:

The restriction on ivermectin was introduced in September 2021 because of concerns about the safety of consumers using ivermectin without health advice to treat COVID-19, widespread use of ivermectin instead of approved vaccines and treatments for COVID-19, and potential shortages of the medicine for approved uses.

So, according to the Therapeutic Goods Administration, there's only one way to prescribe Ivermectin to humans in Australia, as a covid treatment.

Do a double-blind study, prove the efficacy of Ivermectin on covid symptoms, then apply to the TGA.

After that, you'd be patenting your drug for covid treatment and giving it a cunning brand name.

Such as, oh I don't know, Covix, Bigdix[/i], Deaeltrix.

That, after all, is how the drug industry works in countries with standards. Countries like India often have the same standards, their pharmacists just ignore them.

It's most peculiar, I must say. Here you are telling us to educate ourselves, and you haven't even bothered to do a simple search yourself.

Thanks for the lesson.

Silly billy.

Why would a drug company getting 700 dollars a bottle for legivrio , spend millions of dollars doing a study on ivermectin which , if it was proven effective, would earn them pennies. Read the excellent analysis above Roll Eyes

,

Back to top

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101241

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #44 - Yesterday at 6:00pm

aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 5:34pm:

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:20pm:

aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 12:44pm:

Educate yourself.

Because you can't take our a patent on a drug over 10 years old ( if you discover and push a NEW discovery you get 10nyears of monopoly ) there is no incentive to bring to market an old drug.

Ivermectin sells for pennies.

You can spend a billion doing research to prove it works and when you then take it to market YOU GET PENNIES.

it's why drug companies bring out a new , ebet so slightly better variant of their drug for diabetes or blood pressure or depression , every 10 years.

Then they bribe the doctors to prescribe it and the government have to pay them billions of dollars and not pennies because no cheap Indian or Chinese company can copy it for a decade.

Then at the end of a decade the cheap copies come out and the big companies have there next generation PATENTED AND PROTECTED slightly different drug.

Are you seriously saying that an Australian company could start producing Ozempic which is now worth more then Apple or Samsung.

No

It under patent.

Ivermectin is not.

Here endeth the lesson

I told you, I have. Here's more education.

The TGA have listed ivermectin a schedule 4, prescription-only drug

It's a breach of the Therapeutic Goods Act (1989) for doctors to prescribe off-label.

In fact, ivermectin was given a schedule 4 listing to stop people taking it for covid, due to your brainwashed, self-confessed fibs.

Quote:

The restriction on ivermectin was introduced in September 2021 because of concerns about the safety of consumers using ivermectin without health advice to treat COVID-19, widespread use of ivermectin instead of approved vaccines and treatments for COVID-19, and potential shortages of the medicine for approved uses.

So, according to the Therapeutic Goods Administration, there's only one way to prescribe Ivermectin to humans in Australia, as a covid treatment.

Do a double-blind study, prove the efficacy of Ivermectin on covid symptoms, then apply to the TGA.

After that, you'd be patenting your drug for covid treatment and giving it a cunning brand name.

Such as, oh I don't know, Covix, Bigdix[/i], Deaeltrix.

That, after all, is how the drug industry works in countries with standards. Countries like India often have the same standards, their pharmacists just ignore them.

It's most peculiar, I must say. Here you are telling us to educate ourselves, and you haven't even bothered to do a simple search yourself.

Thanks for the lesson.

Silly billy.

Why would a drug company getting 700 dollars a bottle for legivrio , spend millions of dollars doing a study on ivermectin which , if it was proven effective, would earn them pennies. Read the excellent analysis above Roll Eyes

,

Sorry? We've already shown you that 78% of so-called new drugs entering the market are expired, re-labelled patents.

That's not an outlier, the odd patent here or there. It's how the pharmaceutical industry works.

Drug companies spend more money on marketing and legal fees than they do on research. In aggregate terms, we're talking: 30% on marketing, 28% on legal/administrative fees and a mere 15% to 25% on testing.

Now, this is how education works. You post facts, prove them with a legitimate source, and only then provide an analysis.

What you don't do is talk out of your rectum, ignore the facts and crow about providing an excellent analysis.

We call this fibs - something you just confessed you have every right to do.

So I'm curious. How can you ever convince anyone by posting lies?

You know we'll factcheck and catch you out each and every time.

Why do you bother?

Back to top

IP Logged