Australian Politics Forum - Ivermectin and cancer study papers

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 143938 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers Reply #15 - Jun 13^th, 2023 at 7:38am Baron and Caveman "think" COVID is a cancer. Lol
Back to top	IP Logged

Sir lastnail Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 30334 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers Reply #16 - Jun 13^th, 2023 at 12:47pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13^th, 2023 at 7:38am: Baron and Caveman "think" COVID is a cancer. Lol i think they meant you are a cancer LOL
Back to top	"All of the arab states have said we will have peace with Israel when there is a state of Palestine as a UN member state and properly constituted." - Jeffrey Sachs. IP Logged

Baronvonrort Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19466 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers Reply #17 - Jun 14^th, 2023 at 12:09am Sir lastnail wrote on Jun 13^th, 2023 at 12:47pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13^th, 2023 at 7:38am: Baron and Caveman "think" COVID is a cancer. Lol i think they meant you are a cancer LOL Mongs Nongs never contribute anything of substance. Jovial Mong has a forum full of these Nongs.
Back to top	Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it. IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19466
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #18 - Jun 14^th, 2023 at 12:15am

Quote:

Removal of prescribing restrictions on ivermectin

3 May 2023

From 1 June 2023, prescribing of oral ivermectin for ‘off-label’ uses will no longer be limited to specialists such as dermatologists, gastroenterologists and infectious diseases specialists.

In its final decision published today, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has removed the restriction through its scheduling in the Poisons Standard because there is sufficient evidence that the safety risks to individuals and public health is low when prescribed by a general practitioner in the current health climate.

https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/removal-prescribing-restrictions-iver...

They shouldn't have restricted doctors from prescribing this in the first place.

It helps with covid also works in helping vax injuries caused by spike protein. If you check the NIH links in first post looks like it helps with some cancers.

You might need to show that link allowing it not many doctors keep up with the latest news.

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Sophia Gold Member Offline Posts: 8979	Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers Reply #19 - Jul 9^th, 2023 at 4:09pm Who knew this? About ivermectin. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 143938 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers Reply #20 - Jul 9^th, 2023 at 8:29pm Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 12^th, 2023 at 10:55pm: Evidence linked from Australian medical professionals society shows Ivermectin would have saved lives with covid. No, it does not.
Back to top	IP Logged

JC Denton

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5477
Gender: female

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #21 - Jul 9^th, 2023 at 8:45pm

why do people care so much about ivermectin eitherway, covid is a nothingburger for anyone who isnt a fat ass or a fossilised relic, most people who arent either of those things dont need a treatment of any kind for it

ivermectin is the right wing version of the covid vaccines

also imagine still caring about covid in 2023

its over guys (at least in terms of anyone caring anymore), move on

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 51444
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #22 - Jul 9^th, 2023 at 9:20pm

JC Denton wrote on Jul 9^th, 2023 at 8:45pm:

why do people care so much about ivermectin eitherway, covid is a nothingburger for anyone who isnt a fat ass or a fossilised relic, most people who arent either of those things dont need a treatment of any kind for it

ivermectin is the right wing version of the covid vaccines

also imagine still caring about covid in 2023

its over guys (at least in terms of anyone caring anymore), move on

It's never really been about covid but the politics of the response to it.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19466
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #23 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 4:14pm

Quote:

Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects

August 31, 2022

Peer-Reviewed

Results

Among 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, 159,560 were 18 years old or up and were not infected by COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, from which 45,716 (28.7%) did not use and 113,844 (71.3%) used ivermectin. Among ivermectin users, 33,971 (29.8%) used irregularly (up to 60 mg) and 8,325 (7.3%) used regularly (more than 180 mg).

COVID-19 infection rate was 49% lower for regular users (3.40%) than non-users (6.64%)

The infection rate was 32% lower for irregular users than non-users

Among COVID-19 participants, regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users.

The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users (p < 0.0001), and by 29% among irregular users compared to non-users

Mortality rate was 92% lower in regular users than non-users

Risk of dying from COVID-19 was 86% lower among regular users than non-users

Conclusion
Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19.

https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851-regular-use-of-ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-...

We should ask why the TGA didn't allow this to be prescribed in Australia.

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36187
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #24 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 5:33pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 4:14pm:

Quote:

Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects

August 31, 2022

Peer-Reviewed

Results

Among 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, 159,560 were 18 years old or up and were not infected by COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, from which 45,716 (28.7%) did not use and 113,844 (71.3%) used ivermectin. Among ivermectin users, 33,971 (29.8%) used irregularly (up to 60 mg) and 8,325 (7.3%) used regularly (more than 180 mg).

COVID-19 infection rate was 49% lower for regular users (3.40%) than non-users (6.64%)

The infection rate was 32% lower for irregular users than non-users

Among COVID-19 participants, regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users.

The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users (p < 0.0001), and by 29% among irregular users compared to non-users

Mortality rate was 92% lower in regular users than non-users

Risk of dying from COVID-19 was 86% lower among regular users than non-users

Conclusion
Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19.

https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851-regular-use-of-ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-...

We should ask why the TGA didn't allow this to be prescribed in Australia.

big pharma could not make a cent off it, thats why,

why is everyone who has a heart attack put on lipitor which costs the government 1.4 billion a year or xarelto or plavic which cost a similar bomb, when 100 mg of aspirin has a larger effect on preventing another heart attack. no money in aspirin , thats why

Back to top

IP Logged

AusGeoff

Gold Member

Offline

Sage of Gippsland

Posts: 6025
Victoria
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #25 - Mar 27^th, 2024 at 10:14pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 4:14pm:

Quote:

]Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects

August 31, 2022

Peer-Reviewed

Results

Among 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, 159,560 were 18 years old or up and were not infected by COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, from which 45,716 (28.7%) did not use and 113,844 (71.3%) used ivermectin. Among ivermectin users, 33,971 (29.8%) used irregularly (up to 60 mg) and 8,325 (7.3%) used regularly (more than 180 mg).

COVID-19 infection rate was 49% lower for regular users (3.40%) than non-users (6.64%)

The infection rate was 32% lower for irregular users than non-users

Among COVID-19 participants, regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users.
The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users (p < 0.0001), and by 29% among irregular users compared to non-users

Mortality rate was 92% lower in regular users than non-users

Risk of dying from COVID-19 was 86% lower among regular users than non-users

Conclusion
Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19.

https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851-regular-use-of-ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-...

We should ask why the TGA didn't allow this to be prescribed in Australia.

Pretty obvious answer Baron...

Ivermectin was proved not to be effective in the prevention and/or treatment
of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It's only approved to treat people with intestinal
strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis parasitic worms).

Incidentally, In April 2022, the journal Cureus retracted 56 papers
nearly two years after it first began to suspect the works were of dubious
lineage.

So much for your "peer reviewed" LOL.

At that time, at least one author said they didn’t know anything about
the work and Cureus noted the "articles were submitted and subsequently
published purportedly as an effort coordinated by Imam Abdulrahman Bin
Faisal University to ensure all medical interns publish at least one peer-
reviewed article in order to qualify for enrolment in postgraduate residency
programs".

Back to top

IP Logged

AusGeoff

Gold Member

Offline

Sage of Gippsland

Posts: 6025
Victoria
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #26 - Mar 27^th, 2024 at 10:36pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 5:33pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 4:14pm:

Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects...

We should ask why the TGA didn't allow this to be prescribed in Australia.

big pharma could not make a cent off it, that's why,

Uh... mate...

Who do you think manufactures ivermectin? "Big pharma" duh! Roll Eyes

Merck, the manufacturers say "it is important to note that, to-date,
our analysis has identified:

• No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against
COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;

• No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy
in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;

• A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.

We do not believe that the data available support the safety and
efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated
in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information".

Back to top

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19466
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #27 - Nov 5^th, 2024 at 5:35pm

Quote:

William Makis MD
@MakisMD
Radiologist, Oncologist, Cancer Researcher, Author of 100+ publications.

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN and FENBENDAZOLE - Testimonial in a patient with Advanced Epiglottis Cancer (who was offered no treatment options)

I am extremely happy to receive these!

Epiglottis Cancer is a type of Head and Neck Cancer that is difficult to treat surgically or otherwise.

"One year ago I had the death sentence"

“Surgeons offered no hope, no options”

"I heard about Ivermectin...Fenbendazole"

“I am alive & in gratitude to you and your....”

There is only one place in the world you will consistently find testimonials like these.

Thank you for every card, every message.

I treasure them all. 🙏

https://x.com/MakisMD/status/1852246493773676754

More here- https://x.com/MakisMD/status/1852246493773676754

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 143938 Gender:	Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers Reply #28 - Nov 5^th, 2024 at 5:51pm It was on Twitter. It must be true.
Back to top	IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19466
Gender: male

Re: Ivermectin and cancer study papers
Reply #29 - Feb 26^th, 2025 at 10:45pm

Quote:

Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News
@KashPatel_News

Assasinated Japanese P.M. didn’t follow WEF orders. Didn’t mandate vaccines, sent 1.6 Million doses back and gave citizens ivermectin. Make sense now?

https://x.com/KashPatel_News/status/1894471143630700802

The Japanese were the first to say covid was aerosol after Diamond Princess ship outbreak.

Passengers were locked in their cabins isolated from everyone while covid spread through air conditioning.

It took the CDC nearly 2 years to admit covid was aerosol, our RACGP were questioning this for quite some time.

Washing your hands and social distancing do nothing to stop aerosol spread of virus.

Back to top

science_abd9149-fav_013.jpg (54 KB | 10 )

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged