Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25
th, 2023 at 2:56pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me, Soren and what tests would they be? There are no tests that prove or disprove a person's Indigenousness. Indigenousness is not testedable. Indeed, even proposing such test betrays the proposer's Racism. They seek to justify their dislike of Indigenous people is more than just skin deep. Tsk, tsk, tsk...
.
So Aborigines raising the issue are racists. Right-o, cockwomble.
According to Ms Ingram, this race-shift begins with self-identification as an Indigenous person and leads to distortions of culture and people.
The Commonwealth’s three-point criteria for Indigenous identification includes: Indigenous by descent, self-identification as an Indigenous person, and acceptance by a registered Indigenous organisation.
Critiquing the validity of the beyond birth rate increase in the First Nations population, Ms Ingram argued, if the newly identified group were to be tested against the three-point criteria, from the 812,728 people who self-identified as Indigenous, “there has been data to suggest that [the population] should actually be about 300,000 less.”
However, she explained the problem lies not only with the individual, but also rests upon the
non-Indigenous “enablers” who accept the potential misrepresentation, without having knowledge or qualifications to know what is truthful and what is cultural identity fraud.This is something that Australians really do need to start asking ourselves. … Otherwise, it's just going to erase Aboriginal persons.
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/insight/article/community-leaders-warn-many-who-clai...Three-point criteria, not one of three. So their claims of descent should be tested, not just their self-identification. Their acceptance and its basis should also be tested.