Australian Politics Forum - Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith

Bias_2012 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 10766 Gender:	Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith Reply #15 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 3:14pm I think that was a hoax, the video inexplicably shut down and the court has gone into closed session. The real findings might be read out later tonight or tomorrow morning
Back to top	Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39019 Gender:	Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith Reply #16 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 3:30pm Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 3:14pm: I think that was a hoax, the video inexplicably shut down and the court has gone into closed session. The real findings might be read out later tonight or tomorrow morning I watched it live....nothing was shut down. BRS came second on ALL counts!
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39019
Gender: male

Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith
Reply #17 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 3:45pm

He really is a moron. How much different would his World be right now (he would not be hiding in Bali) if he NEVER brought this action.

I hesitate to call him a murderer as that ought to only happen after a criminal conviction, but....you watch....on the basis of this Judgement, schmedia will now report he is now determined, on the balance of probability, to be a cold blooded murderer who has disgraced the SAS and Australia.

Fuqqing idiot.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 109681
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith
Reply #18 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:18pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 2:54pm:

So, it has been established in a civil trial that BRS is a murderer, plus.

No wonder Houston is after those gongs.

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 3:45pm:

He really is a moron. How much different would his World be right now (he would not be hiding in Bali) if he NEVER brought this action.

I hesitate to call him a murderer as that ought to only happen after a criminal conviction, but....you watch....on the basis of this Judgement, schmedia will now report he is now determined, on the balance of probability, to be a cold blooded murderer who has disgraced the SAS and Australia.

Fuqqing idiot.

I watched the judgement on TV.
It was all couched in incidents referred to by numbers that
didn't relate to murders or anything I could pin down.
It was also hidden away due to "National Security" -
so the Govt has run for cover to have it mostly redacted.
Govt's are good at covering up their crimes with that excuse.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39019
Gender: male

Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith
Reply #19 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:26pm

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:18pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 2:54pm:

So, it has been established in a civil trial that BRS is a murderer, plus.

No wonder Houston is after those gongs.

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 3:45pm:

He really is a moron. How much different would his World be right now (he would not be hiding in Bali) if he NEVER brought this action.

I hesitate to call him a murderer as that ought to only happen after a criminal conviction, but....you watch....on the basis of this Judgement, schmedia will now report he is now determined, on the balance of probability, to be a cold blooded murderer who has disgraced the SAS and Australia.

Fuqqing idiot.

I watched the judgement on TV.
It was all couched in incidents referred to by numbers that
didn't relate to murders or anything I could pin down.
It was also hidden away due to "National Security" -
so the Govt has run for cover to have it mostly redacted.
Govt's are good at covering up their crimes with that excuse.

I understood every word of it. The only words you need to know Bobby are those where the Judge dismissed EVERY claim made by Smith and upheld the truth allegations raised by the defendants that BRS is a cold blooded murderer etc.

The Judge did not find that Smith had been committed domestic violence but...given he had found that Smith was a murderer, that someone called him a domestic violence offender could not possibly impact on his 'reputation.' (Contextual truth defence.)

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 109681
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith
Reply #20 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:31pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:26pm:

I understood every word of it. The only words you need to know Bobby are those where the Judge dismissed EVERY claim made by Smith and upheld the truth allegations raised by the defendants that BRS is a cold blooded murderer etc.

The Judge did not find that Smith had been committed domestic violence but...given he had found that Smith was a murderer, that someone called him a domestic violence offender could not possibly impact on his 'reputation.' (Contextual truth defence.)

he didn't use words - he used numbers.
e.g. incident number 7 is upheld.
What the hell was incident 7?

Every?
No - some claim numbers were accepted as true and some dismissed.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39019
Gender: male

Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith
Reply #21 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:34pm

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:26pm:

I understood every word of it. The only words you need to know Bobby are those where the Judge dismissed EVERY claim made by Smith and upheld the truth allegations raised by the defendants that BRS is a cold blooded murderer etc.

The Judge did not find that Smith had been committed domestic violence but...given he had found that Smith was a murderer, that someone called him a domestic violence offender could not possibly impact on his 'reputation.' (Contextual truth defence.)

he didn't use words - he used numbers.
e.g. incident number 7 is upheld.
What the hell was incident 7?

Every?
No - some claim numbers were accepted as true and some dismissed.

At the very outset of his judgement, he carefully described every "incident number."

When you see the written judgement, it will be easier to understand.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 109681
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith
Reply #22 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:45pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:34pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:26pm:

I understood every word of it. The only words you need to know Bobby are those where the Judge dismissed EVERY claim made by Smith and upheld the truth allegations raised by the defendants that BRS is a cold blooded murderer etc.

The Judge did not find that Smith had been committed domestic violence but...given he had found that Smith was a murderer, that someone called him a domestic violence offender could not possibly impact on his 'reputation.' (Contextual truth defence.)

he didn't use words - he used numbers.
e.g. incident number 7 is upheld.
What the hell was incident 7?

Every?
No - some claim numbers were accepted as true and some dismissed.

At the very outset of his judgement, he carefully described every "incident number."

When you see the written judgement, it will be easier to understand.

OK.
Well I hope that Ben goes on trial for war crimes.
The wheels of justice move slowly.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39019
Gender: male

Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith
Reply #23 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:48pm

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:34pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:26pm:

I understood every word of it. The only words you need to know Bobby are those where the Judge dismissed EVERY claim made by Smith and upheld the truth allegations raised by the defendants that BRS is a cold blooded murderer etc.

The Judge did not find that Smith had been committed domestic violence but...given he had found that Smith was a murderer, that someone called him a domestic violence offender could not possibly impact on his 'reputation.' (Contextual truth defence.)

he didn't use words - he used numbers.
e.g. incident number 7 is upheld.
What the hell was incident 7?

Every?
No - some claim numbers were accepted as true and some dismissed.

At the very outset of his judgement, he carefully described every "incident number."

When you see the written judgement, it will be easier to understand.

OK.
Well I hope that Ben goes on trial for war crimes.
The wheels of justice move slowly.

The ADF/Feds will wait until he has exhausted all appeals avenues, and then....he will get the book thrown at him.

This is massive.

Nothing publicly known even comes near it in Australian Military (disgraceful) history.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 50995 Gender:	Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith Reply #24 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:51pm Did he win?
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 76170 Gender:	Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith Reply #25 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:54pm where are all those high and mighty morons who started crying every time someone accused BRS of impropriety?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 109681
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith
Reply #26 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:55pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:48pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:34pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:26pm:

I understood every word of it. The only words you need to know Bobby are those where the Judge dismissed EVERY claim made by Smith and upheld the truth allegations raised by the defendants that BRS is a cold blooded murderer etc.

The Judge did not find that Smith had been committed domestic violence but...given he had found that Smith was a murderer, that someone called him a domestic violence offender could not possibly impact on his 'reputation.' (Contextual truth defence.)

he didn't use words - he used numbers.
e.g. incident number 7 is upheld.
What the hell was incident 7?

Every?
No - some claim numbers were accepted as true and some dismissed.

At the very outset of his judgement, he carefully described every "incident number."

When you see the written judgement, it will be easier to understand.

OK.
Well I hope that Ben goes on trial for war crimes.
The wheels of justice move slowly.

The ADF/Feds will wait until he has exhausted all appeals avenues, and then....he will get the book thrown at him.

This is massive.

Nothing publicly known even comes near it in Australian Military (disgraceful) history.

I wonder if a trial will be here or if
they hand him over to the ICC in the Hague ?

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39019 Gender:	Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith Reply #27 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:57pm John Smith wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:54pm: where are all those high and mighty morons who started crying every time someone accused BRS of impropriety? Indeed...''fog of war" horseshit etc. Grappler...where are you?
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39019
Gender: male

Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith
Reply #28 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:58pm

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:55pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:48pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:34pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:31pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:26pm:

I understood every word of it. The only words you need to know Bobby are those where the Judge dismissed EVERY claim made by Smith and upheld the truth allegations raised by the defendants that BRS is a cold blooded murderer etc.

The Judge did not find that Smith had been committed domestic violence but...given he had found that Smith was a murderer, that someone called him a domestic violence offender could not possibly impact on his 'reputation.' (Contextual truth defence.)

he didn't use words - he used numbers.
e.g. incident number 7 is upheld.
What the hell was incident 7?

Every?
No - some claim numbers were accepted as true and some dismissed.

At the very outset of his judgement, he carefully described every "incident number."

When you see the written judgement, it will be easier to understand.

OK.
Well I hope that Ben goes on trial for war crimes.
The wheels of justice move slowly.

The ADF/Feds will wait until he has exhausted all appeals avenues, and then....he will get the book thrown at him.

This is massive.

Nothing publicly known even comes near it in Australian Military (disgraceful) history.

I wonder if a trial will be here or if
they hand him over to the ICC in the Hague ?

I reckon there will be no trial.****

The **** are no error. They are intentional for later reference.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 109681 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Judgement Day for Roberts-Smith Reply #29 - Jun 1^st, 2023 at 5:04pm Aussie wrote on Jun 1^st, 2023 at 4:58pm: I reckon there will be no trial.** The ** are no error. They are intentional for later reference. He murdered innocent people in our name. Justice must be done.
Back to top	IP Logged

Poll
Question: Will Ben Roberts win this defamation case?
Yes 4 (23.5%) No 10 (58.8%) Who cares? 3 (17.6%) Total votes: 17 « Created by: Lisa Jones on: Jun 1^st, 2023 at 2:04pm »