John Smith wrote on May 14
th, 2025 at 4:46pm:
Frank wrote on May 14
th, 2025 at 10:51am:
What the referendum has shown is that Australia does not want or like, by a large, convincing margin, race-based special pleading in law by Aborigines.
But what we all see, post-referendum, is various governments are pressing on with accommodating race based special pleading in law by Aborigines.
In addition we also see other racial and ethnic groups also pressing their race-based, ethnic special pleading with governments. And governments by and large go along and accommodate them.
you just can't keep pretending that the referendum was whatever you want it to be. The referendum was about changing the constitution. That was what people voted against. It wasn't a vote against closing the gap, it wasn't a vote against recognition, it wasn't a vote against laws that help aborigines, it wasn't a vote to be a racist crunt ....
It was a rejection of race and ethnicity based special pleading in law - like I said, Thicko.
It was a referendum on upholding equality before the law, Thicko.
Are you saying that Aborigines are abusing, murdering each other, neglecting and abusing their children, live in squalor
because of equality before the law,
because of legalised, codified equality of opportunity - but for Aborigines, equality is discrimination against them and a hindrance to their joining civilisation??
I don't think there is anything special about Aborigines - is that wacist crunt talk? Must we all maintain strict race based differentiation so as NOT to be called wacist crunts by thick, broom-jockey concreters like you and that other preening moron in nappies?
Go, sweep up, bozo.