Bobby. wrote on Apr 14
th, 2023 at 9:06pm:
Karnal wrote on Apr 14
th, 2023 at 7:59pm:
Is this true, Bobby? Are we LOCKING HER UP for saying nasty things about Mr Trump?
You know, when they go low we go high, basket of deplorables, we need to give Mr Trump a fair go and respect the peaceful transition of power, that sort of thing?
So mean.
But if you wouldn't mind explaining, which crime are we going to LOCK HER UP for?
You haven't said.
It's all here:
A Full List of Hillary Clinton’s Crimes
https://www.sebgorka.com/a-full-list-of-hillary-clintons-crimes/ I see. We'll go through your list one by one, shall we?
Quote:acquisition by Rosatom.
Shortly after the successful acquisition of Uranium One – which took place during Obama’s first term, while Clinton was Secretary of State – Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 by the Russian bank Renaissance Capital to give a speech in Moscow.
So Obama, who signed off on the sale of Uranium One, was influenced by a $500,000 speech fee to the previous prez Bill, was he? Hillary didn't sign off on anything.
So I'm curious. What do you have to say about the most recent $16 mil loan to your Dear Leader by a Kremlin operative?
Quote:Towards the end of last year, federal prosecutors started examining two loans totaling $8m wired to Trump Media, through the Caribbean, from two obscure entities that both appear to be controlled in part by the relation of an ally of Russian president Vladimir Putin.
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a43329318/russian-investment-trum...It's 32 times the figure Bill got for his speech, Hillary didn't approve any uranium sales or takeover, and Bill was paid by for a motivational speech by Russians with no government connections whatsover.
Please explain?
We'll move onto the next claim when you're done.