AusGeoff wrote on Jul 5
th, 2023 at 9:16pm:
The "Voice" = ATSIC v.2 = waste of taxpayer money.
One voice already failed, and another to fail inevitably.
ATSIC was abolished because it was too corrupt and THEREFORE ineffective. Why was it corrupt?
It was too clannish, tribal, nepotistic. Can clannish, tribal people have an organisation composed along clannish, tribal lines that is not corrupt (ie clannish and tribal)?
The predecessor of ATSIC was also abolished.
The NAC also campaigned at an international level for a treaty (pp. 386–7). At the United Nations, the World Council of Indigenous Peoples, and the World Assembly of First Nations,
the NAC put forward suggestions for a Makarrata including:- land rights over former reserves and national parks and recognition of traditional rights to hunt, fish and gather on Crown lands
- a National Aboriginal Bank, tax exemptions and payment of 5% of Australia’s gross national product for 195 years as reparations
- one seat per state in the House of Representatives and the Senate to be reserved for an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander person
- self-government of Aboriginal communities and respect for Aboriginal customary law
- return of artefacts and artworks and control over research on Aboriginal people
- dedicated Aboriginal schools, medical centres and legal aid.[4]
The Hawke Government stated in 1985 that it considered a Makarrata would be ‘difficult at this stage’ in the context of ‘efforts required to promote community acceptance for the concept of national land rights legislation’. In 1985, the Hawke Government abolished the NAC, after commissioning a review of its performance and governance. As the NAC was not legislated, it could be abolished by the minister without parliamentary action.
https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_...Would a Voice be asking for similar things in their Makarata aims? Of course they would.
Are they preposterous demands? Yes, they are.