Dnarever wrote on Jan 23
rd, 2023 at 11:04pm:
Gnads wrote on Jan 23
rd, 2023 at 7:29am:
Dnarever wrote on Jan 22
nd, 2023 at 11:25am:
Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 22
nd, 2023 at 9:16am:
I reckon the armorer should be the one held to account.
Why has nobody mentioned the person who loaded the gun with live ammunition or brought live ammunition matching a gun used as a prop to a movie set?
As far as I can tell this hasn't been investigated, they do not even know for sure that it was not done deliberately. Seems that they have laid charges but only have half the story.
Really? That was the "amourer" .... who has been mentioned several times & who along with Baldwin has been charged with manslaughter.
NUP, not what they are saying. The Armourer loaded the gun from a box of blanks. They don't know who put live rounds in the box of blanks. This person hasn't been charged with anything.
Quote:“There was a box of dummy rounds and the box is labelled dummy. Hannah did take from that box which she by all accounts should have been able to rely on, that contains only dummy rounds,” said Gutierrez Reed’s lawyer Jason Bowles. “She loaded rounds from that box into the handgun only to later find out – and she had no idea – she inspected the rounds, that there was a live round. Now we don’t know, however, whether that live round came from that box. We’re assuming it did. We’re assuming somebody put the live round in that box
Yeah & who do you think put a live round in the box of blanks????? Who is that person?
That then becomes premeditated or conspiracy to murder.
And Gutierrez Reeds lawyer(& maybe you) had better learn the difference between DUMMY round & BLANK round....... they are not the same.
Dummy rounds go "click" - blank rounds go "bang".
Dummy rounds do not contain powder or a primer, blanks do.
A dummy round has a real bullet in it.
A blank has the brass crimped where the bullet would go.
A competent Armorer would know & should have picked the difference of a live round.