Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 17
Send Topic Print
The Voice Kool-Aid (Read 10594 times)
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 19926
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #120 - Dec 13th, 2022 at 8:57pm
 
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 8:46pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 6:53pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 6:25pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 5:27pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 3:02pm:
So when the ONLY argument for Yes is that a No would be racist, people rightly suspect hidden motives and bad faith. If it cannot be openly debated then it is a bad idea that must be defeated.


Get your own house in order friend.

You're in no place what so ever to pretend you're on a high horse when the standard of debate around not supporting the voice is as vile and despicable as it is here, and you're condoning it by sooking over people calling it out.


Show me ONE vile and despicable argument against the Voice in the public, mainstream debate.  There isn't any.  There are questions and educated, legal speculations about unintended (?) consequences of lawfare. You have not provided anything but the usual emoting yourself.


Yet "Marcia Langton warns of risk of ‘nasty, eugenicist’ debate about race ahead of voice referendum"  “It’s unfortunate the Nationals have injected misinformation and vitriol into this debate so early on,” she told ABC Radio National.


Bollocks. There was no vitriol, there was no misinformation. She could have pointed out any if there had been any. She didn't.  Pearson ditto.

What will the Voice achieve that all the other hundreds of organisations and programs couldn't and how will it achieve it?
If such questions are 'sooking' to you then you are talking just as dishonestly and in bad faith as the other 'it's wacist to as question about the voice' numpties.



This is, technically, a public forum...

Nobody is stupid enough to put their name to these claims, not even Boris, it's all done anonymously here.

He, those like him, they're all cowards.


Unlike you, eh??   

You are being dishonest.  Do you REALLY think that accusations of redneckery and racism by Pearson, Langton and other Yes proponents are referencing views on this forum, and not Price, Mundene, the Nationals, Albrechtsen etc and other public, identifiable voices asking questions


I've not had the time to look at their claims, which is why I've not made any comments about them and only those people I mentioned on this forum.

Quote:
Of course not. You ARE just being dishonest and shifty.

Sad, kangaroo. Try honesty next time. Or will that hurt your cause?


The problem with your demands of honesty is that they're meaningless coming from someone like you.

I have been honest.

I'm not interested in the debate on the Voice vote yet since the Government has yet to detail it or put forward a date for the Referendum.

What I can't stand by and let slide is racist cu
nts
, and racist mods, championing genocide or trying to paint all Indigenous Australians as child rapists and murders as their arguments against the voice, as if they're sub-human savages, or lying that it will give them control over all Australians.

It's lunacy that needs to stop, or at least get pushback.

I never said this was coming from the people you've highlighted.

I've not seen their arguments, but even if they are racist, IF, it would be nothing compared to what is being normalised within this hell hole.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 87675
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #121 - Dec 13th, 2022 at 9:00pm
 
Boris wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 8:55pm:
Peter Sutton finds it distressing that in north and central Australia, relatives of small children “cruel” them by inflicting pain to make the child angry and violent, even from six months old. He believes this is a tradition dating from earliest times when aggression needed to be instilled in children.

NOWRA WROTE his book “Bad Dreaming” after a spell in Alice Springs hospital in 2005, when he saw numerous Aboriginal women and young girls with severe injuries from domestic violence. He visited outback communities and found them astonishingly brutal:

“Some of the women’s faces ended up looking as though an incompetent butcher had conducted plastic surgery with a hammer and saw. The fear in the women’s eyes reminded me of dogs whipped into cringing submission.”

In contemporary Australia, polygamy and traditions of promised-brides continue in Arnhem Land and other remote areas. Until recently, the judiciary was lenient in such cases involving forced under-age sex. Jarrett writes,

“There are Aboriginal men who still claim these modern young girls as their promised possession, and have cars, guns, outstations and kin to help them secure and punish these resistant girls, well away from public purview. ..A man’s traditional sense of entitlement, and use of violence to enforce it, can still triumph over the emancipation of a young Aboriginal woman’s mind.”

In 2004 at Yarralin near Katherine, a 55-year-old married man physically and sexually assaulted his 14-year-old promised bride for two days while she pleaded she was too young for sex. In August, 2005, in an under-the-tree session, Justice Brian Martin noted the cultural context, and gave the man a one-month sentence suspended. On appeal the sentence was increased to three years and a defence appeal to the High Court was lost. Justice Martin later admitted he had been too lenient.

In 2002 at Maningrida, Jackie Pascoe Jamilmira, a 50-year-old wife killer, had forced sex on a 15-year-old promised bride, for whom he had given presents to the ‘bride’s’ parents. He then fired a shotgun into the air to warn off the girls’ family members. Justice John Gallop of the NT Supreme Court sentenced him to 24 hours gaol for unlawful sex, saying the matter should never have come to court. Pascoe, he said, was exercising his conjugal rights in traditional society and the girl ‘knew what was expected of her. It’s surprising to me [that the defendant] was charged at all’.

The North Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service relied on expert anthropological evidence to argue that promised marriages were common and morally correct under Aboriginal law, and supported his application to the High Court.


Kingdom Of The Cruel Children - that's what the Khmer Rouge did to young 'recruits' to teach them how to be good party workers with guns, and look how that turned out.

Such primitive ideas have no place in a modern society.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 87675
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #122 - Dec 13th, 2022 at 9:02pm
 
Kanga... BUBE`... the list is right there for you - time to ante up or shut up .....

You can do it - after all - you know everything!  Jesus - school holidays...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Boris
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4372
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #123 - Dec 13th, 2022 at 9:11pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 8:48pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 8:35pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 6:53pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 6:25pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 5:27pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 3:02pm:
So when the ONLY argument for Yes is that a No would be racist, people rightly suspect hidden motives and bad faith. If it cannot be openly debated then it is a bad idea that must be defeated.


Get your own house in order friend.

You're in no place what so ever to pretend you're on a high horse when the standard of debate around not supporting the voice is as vile and despicable as it is here, and you're condoning it by sooking over people calling it out.


Show me ONE vile and despicable argument against the Voice in the public, mainstream debate.  There isn't any.  There are questions and educated, legal speculations about unintended (?) consequences of lawfare. You have not provided anything but the usual emoting yourself.


Yet "Marcia Langton warns of risk of ‘nasty, eugenicist’ debate about race ahead of voice referendum"  “It’s unfortunate the Nationals have injected misinformation and vitriol into this debate so early on,” she told ABC Radio National.


Bollocks. There was no vitriol, there was no misinformation. She could have pointed out any if there had been any. She didn't.  Pearson ditto.

What will the Voice achieve that all the other hundreds of organisations and programs couldn't and how will it achieve it?
If such questions are 'sooking' to you then you are talking just as dishonestly and in bad faith as the other 'it's wacist to as question about the voice' numpties.







This is, technically, a public forum...

Nobody is stupid enough to put their name to these claims, not even Boris, it's all done anonymously here.

He, those like him, they're all cowards.


That ranks amongst the most vapid and insulting posts put up here about the Voice.... that failure waiting to happen..... you are part of the problem not the solution and give ample reason why nobody should vote for such a stupid idea.

If they are cowards for posting on an anonymous forum - what are you?


I would gladly put my name to my position in any public venue, just not here because of the level of crazy I've witnessed, and attempts to dox me in the past.

My current stand, in case it needs reiterating, is that I don't support the voice with the information we have at hand, which is very little, which the Government have made clear.

The Referendum is not today, tomorrow or next week.

There needs to be a public forum where the aims and goal of the voice, the details on how it will work, need to be put to the public and understood.  The Government have promised this and I eagerly await it.

At that time, I am happy to weigh in again, informed, and share my opinion and how I'm going to vote.

Until then, when I see racist sh
itba
gs saying the voice will give Indigenous Australians dominion and control over everyone else in the country or that they're not worthy of representation because they subhuman savages who all, every single one of them rape and murder children and should be shot and killed in the streets, I'm going to speak out against it.

When that vile, horrid hate speech goes unchecked it festers in the echo chambers, such as this place, condoned by the moderation team and site owner, it can lead to offline extremism which costs lives.

If they won't do anything about it, I will at least, for the time I'm willing to waste here, fight back against these insecure little bitch babies trying to improve their own standing in their tiny little pea-brained heads by discriminating against others as if that has any sort of impact on them.

Nah, fu
ck
them, and fu
ck
you if you defend their ilk.

That last comment is really for anyone, as for Grappler, you are one of them, so you can fu
ck
off and die at your leasure.



Until then, when I see racist sh
itba
gs saying the voice will give Indigenous Australians dominion and control over everyone else in the country

Yes it will as they have power of Veto over all Legislation and they are unelected

or that they're not worthy of representation because they subhuman savages who all, every single one of them rape and murder children

Do you know what happens at the Initiations? They are all raped and many die

and should be shot and killed in the streets, I'm going to speak out against it.

The army needs to be called in to restore order in Alice Springs - is all I said - nobody said anything about shooting and killing in the streets - You are a deluded fool and I speak out against stupid fools like you who has never been where I have been nor seen what I have seen
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 14th, 2022 at 8:03am by Boris »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51444
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #124 - Dec 13th, 2022 at 9:16pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 8:57pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 8:46pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 6:53pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 6:25pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 5:27pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 3:02pm:
So when the ONLY argument for Yes is that a No would be racist, people rightly suspect hidden motives and bad faith. If it cannot be openly debated then it is a bad idea that must be defeated.


Get your own house in order friend.

You're in no place what so ever to pretend you're on a high horse when the standard of debate around not supporting the voice is as vile and despicable as it is here, and you're condoning it by sooking over people calling it out.


Show me ONE vile and despicable argument against the Voice in the public, mainstream debate.  There isn't any.  There are questions and educated, legal speculations about unintended (?) consequences of lawfare. You have not provided anything but the usual emoting yourself.


Yet "Marcia Langton warns of risk of ‘nasty, eugenicist’ debate about race ahead of voice referendum"  “It’s unfortunate the Nationals have injected misinformation and vitriol into this debate so early on,” she told ABC Radio National.


Bollocks. There was no vitriol, there was no misinformation. She could have pointed out any if there had been any. She didn't.  Pearson ditto.

What will the Voice achieve that all the other hundreds of organisations and programs couldn't and how will it achieve it?
If such questions are 'sooking' to you then you are talking just as dishonestly and in bad faith as the other 'it's wacist to as question about the voice' numpties.



This is, technically, a public forum...

Nobody is stupid enough to put their name to these claims, not even Boris, it's all done anonymously here.

He, those like him, they're all cowards.


Unlike you, eh??   

You are being dishonest.  Do you REALLY think that accusations of redneckery and racism by Pearson, Langton and other Yes proponents are referencing views on this forum, and not Price, Mundene, the Nationals, Albrechtsen etc and other public, identifiable voices asking questions


I've not had the time to look at their claims, which is why I've not made any comments about them and only those people I mentioned on this forum.

Quote:
Of course not. You ARE just being dishonest and shifty.

Sad, kangaroo. Try honesty next time. Or will that hurt your cause?


The problem with your demands of honesty is that they're meaningless coming from someone like you.

I have been honest.

I'm not interested in the debate on the Voice vote yet since the Government has yet to detail it or put forward a date for the Referendum.

What I can't stand by and let slide is racist cu
nts
, and racist mods, championing genocide or trying to paint all Indigenous Australians as child rapists and murders as their arguments against the voice, as if they're sub-human savages, or lying that it will give them control over all Australians.

It's lunacy that needs to stop, or at least get pushback.

I never said this was coming from the people you've highlighted.

I've not seen their arguments, but even if they are racist, IF, it would be nothing compared to what is being normalised within this hell hole.


I don't see how you could 'not have time' to look at the national debate on the Voice, yet have all the time for its inconsequential and faintest echoes in this little forum.  That's nutty and shifty. Do you really think this forum is representative and so  that's why you prioritise it with your time over the public debate?
No, of course not. You are just not honest with us or yourself.





Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 87675
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #125 - Dec 13th, 2022 at 9:24pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 8:57pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 8:46pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 6:53pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 6:25pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 5:27pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 3:02pm:
So when the ONLY argument for Yes is that a No would be racist, people rightly suspect hidden motives and bad faith. If it cannot be openly debated then it is a bad idea that must be defeated.


Get your own house in order friend.

You're in no place what so ever to pretend you're on a high horse when the standard of debate around not supporting the voice is as vile and despicable as it is here, and you're condoning it by sooking over people calling it out.


Show me ONE vile and despicable argument against the Voice in the public, mainstream debate.  There isn't any.  There are questions and educated, legal speculations about unintended (?) consequences of lawfare. You have not provided anything but the usual emoting yourself.


Yet "Marcia Langton warns of risk of ‘nasty, eugenicist’ debate about race ahead of voice referendum"  “It’s unfortunate the Nationals have injected misinformation and vitriol into this debate so early on,” she told ABC Radio National.


Bollocks. There was no vitriol, there was no misinformation. She could have pointed out any if there had been any. She didn't.  Pearson ditto.

What will the Voice achieve that all the other hundreds of organisations and programs couldn't and how will it achieve it?
If such questions are 'sooking' to you then you are talking just as dishonestly and in bad faith as the other 'it's wacist to as question about the voice' numpties.



This is, technically, a public forum...

Nobody is stupid enough to put their name to these claims, not even Boris, it's all done anonymously here.

He, those like him, they're all cowards.


Unlike you, eh??   

You are being dishonest.  Do you REALLY think that accusations of redneckery and racism by Pearson, Langton and other Yes proponents are referencing views on this forum, and not Price, Mundene, the Nationals, Albrechtsen etc and other public, identifiable voices asking questions


I've not had the time to look at their claims, which is why I've not made any comments about them and only those people I mentioned on this forum.

Quote:
Of course not. You ARE just being dishonest and shifty.

Sad, kangaroo. Try honesty next time. Or will that hurt your cause?


The problem with your demands of honesty is that they're meaningless coming from someone like you.

I have been honest.

I'm not interested in the debate on the Voice vote yet since the Government has yet to detail it or put forward a date for the Referendum.

What I can't stand by and let slide is racist cu
nts
, and racist mods, championing genocide or trying to paint all Indigenous Australians as child rapists and murders as their arguments against the voice, as if they're sub-human savages, or lying that it will give them control over all Australians.

It's lunacy that needs to stop, or at least get pushback.

I never said this was coming from the people you've highlighted.

I've not seen their arguments, but even if they are racist, IF, it would be nothing compared to what is being normalised within this hell hole.


Where did anyone EVER say that all Aboriginal Australians do those things?  Since nobody has ever said that - clearly commenting on it is not racist in any way... but ascribes to perpetrators the guilt and responsibility and points out that there MUST be something done to stop them.

You are fantasising... I'll send my two Aboriginal nephews around to clear it up for you... and my three Aboriginal nieces... you reckon I'd let some creep beat on them etc?  Or their brothers and cousins would?  My son is as white as they come and he would not tolerate that for an instant to one of his own..... then there's my daughter.... or my niece - not to be crossed ...

Get a life... are you fourteen years old or something?  Bet you don't even know an Aborigine.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 19926
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #126 - Dec 14th, 2022 at 7:55am
 
Boris wrote on Dec 13th, 2022 at 9:11pm:
Until then, when I see racist sh
itba
gs saying the voice will give Indigenous Australians dominion and control over everyone else in the country

Yes it will as they have power of Veto over all Legislation and they are unelected


No, they won't. The voice offers no power whatsoever.  We've been through this.  It's an advisory role.  It's still up to our elected officials to listen to or ignore that voice.

Quote:
Voice to parliament won’t give ‘special rights’ to Indigenous Australians, legal experts say


The proposed Indigenous voice to parliament would not have a veto power and would not confer “special rights” to any person, a government-selected group of constitutional experts has advised, in a bid to address “plainly incorrect assertions” .

The government has set up several expert groups to advise on details of the voice referendum, expected to be held in the second half of 2023, including a Constitutional Expert Group made up of legal academics including Prof Anne Twomey and Prof George Williams.

The legal experts have advised that the constitutional amendment proposed by the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, at the Garma festival was “constitutionally sound in providing a strong basis on which to conduct further consultation”.

“The voice does not confer ‘rights’, much less ‘special rights’, on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples,” they said.

“Nor would the voice change or take away any right, power or privilege of anyone who is not Indigenous.”

That advice was considered on Monday by the larger Referendum Working Group, which is made up of more than 20 Indigenous community leaders and academics including Noel Pearson, Yothu Yindi Foundation chairman Dr Galarrwuy Yunupingu, health expert Pat Turner, Prof Marcia Langton and former Coalition Indigenous minister Ken Wyatt.

“The draft provision does not in any way provide the voice with a veto power over the functions or powers of the parliament or the executive,” the legal advice said.

“The function of ‘making representations’ appropriately reflects its advisory role.”



Quote:
or that they're not worthy of representation because they subhuman savages who all, every single one of them rape and murder children

Do you know what happens at the Initiations? They are all raped and many die


Yes, but you keep saying this is all Indigenous Australians...  Again, how many times do we have to go through this..!?

Boris wrote on Dec 11th, 2022 at 8:41am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 11th, 2022 at 8:30am:
In case there has been some miscommunication, you're saying that ALL Indigenous Australians do these things you claim, not just their bad elements like in any community?


Yes


It's too long to quote the entire exchange, but it can be clicked on to see the full context.

Quote:
and should be shot and killed in the streets, I'm going to speak out against it.

The army needs to be called in to restore order in Alice Springs - is all I said - nobody said anything about sooting and killing in the streets - You are a deluded fool and I speak out against stupid fools like you who has never been where I have been nor seen what I have seen


Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Aug 10th, 2022 at 4:21pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 10th, 2022 at 11:34am:
Boris wrote on Aug 10th, 2022 at 11:31am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 10th, 2022 at 11:25am:
Boris wrote on Aug 10th, 2022 at 11:24am:
The Alice is out of all control

Do you care about there people in terror there?


Even in that group you took it from, did you bother looking at the comments?

Very few people support bringing in the Army and nobody is calling for them to start shooting like you are.

You've taken a headline and gone full-blown "this means we can finally kill them all!"...


Go live there


Can you at least pretend you don't want to kill them all?



Nah - 10% might be worth saving.........


Wow, the mods finally did something, they've gone back and removed your claims about shooting them all, and even removed it from my quotes...

And it had to be them because your posts aren't displaying as being edited, and my quotes of it have been changed too...

I'm glad they finally took action, but it was to protect racist posters what the fu
ck
!?

Wow...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Boris
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4372
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #127 - Dec 14th, 2022 at 8:07am
 
There will be no details until after the referendum

So Australians are asked to vote to change the Constitution when we do not know what we are voting for.

Are we really this stupid?

The lawyers have read it and said Australia will be Governed by the High Court not by Democracy because all laws and legislation concern Aborigines.

They are not our friends and just want to destroy Australia and not make it a better place - and the Voice is step 1 and step 2 and 3 is "Truth Telling" and "Makaratta" or Revenge/ Payback

We are going into this blind deaf and dumb as well as stupid


Voice model to be decided after referendum
The Albanese government will not introduce legislation on a ­proposed model for the Indigenous voice until after Australians go to a referendum in the second half of 2023.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=TAWEB_WRE170_a_GGL...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 14th, 2022 at 2:49pm by Boris »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51444
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #128 - Dec 14th, 2022 at 11:13am
 
Boris wrote on Dec 14th, 2022 at 8:07am:
There will be no details until after the referendum

So Australians are asked to vote to change the Constitution when we do not know what we are voting for.

Are we really this stupid?




Weeeellll..... Albo got elected exactly like that, sooooo.....    it's a yes, I'm afraid.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51444
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #129 - Dec 14th, 2022 at 11:47am
 
We have 1100 or so Aboriginal organisations advising every level of government.  By their own accounts, they each do a fantastic job.

What difference will one more make and why must it be embedded into the Constitution?

I tell you. To be justicable, that is, lawyerable.  And it will be lawyered every time the executive doesn't do as advised by the Voice. There is simply no other reason to have an advisory body to be constitutionally cemented in place for the purpose of twisting the arm of government.

Why have the Voice in the Constitution if it can be ignored by government or parliament? The answer is self-evident: it has to be in the Constitution SO it cannot be ignored.  So the 'may make representations' is a phrase meaning 'will make offers the government could  not ignore'.





Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 14th, 2022 at 1:00pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Boris
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4372
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #130 - Dec 14th, 2022 at 12:30pm
 
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

― Taylor Caldwell, A Pillar of Iron
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44327
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #131 - Dec 14th, 2022 at 2:04pm
 
The High Court was voted into the Constitution with no detail of how it was to be structured or how it was to operate.  Yet Australians took the Government of the day on trust and enacted one of the most efficient and trusted organisations in existence.  The Voice is similar.  We have no or little detail, we are expected to take the Government on trust and have enacted a good means of representing the needs and requirements of the Indigenous People of Australia.  We have the nay-sayers, the time wasters, the Racists spreading their lies about what The Voice will be and what it's powers will entail.  Oh, dearie, dearie, me and they expect us to believe them and their claims?  Bullshit.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Boris
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4372
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #132 - Dec 14th, 2022 at 2:20pm
 
Why would I care about what a savage who rapes and murders children and in my lifetime also ate children has to say about anything when they are drunk and violent and destructive and destroy their own communities?

Unlike the previous views of the Australian Left, the current radical orthodoxy has attained almost ubiquitous official status, endorsed in such works as Bringing Them Home (1997) on the alleged “stolen generations” and in countless verbal acknowledgments, at public meetings and in documents of every kind, of the “traditional owners” of the land and of the Aboriginal “elders, past, present and emerging”, oblivious to the real nature of pre-contact Aboriginal society, with its horrifying and barbaric record of infanticide (about 35 per cent of Aboriginal babies were murdered at birth), cannibalism, the gross and ubiquitous mistreatment of women, tribal warfare, and its total failure in 50,000 years to produce a written language, permanent settlements, or a viable agriculture with a food surplus. This focus on the alleged merits of pre-contact Aboriginal society is almost always accompanied by the denigration of white settlers as mass murderers who carried out massacres and genocides.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 14th, 2022 at 2:26pm by Boris »  
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Caveman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #133 - Dec 14th, 2022 at 2:27pm
 
Boris wrote on Dec 14th, 2022 at 8:07am:
There will be no details until after the referendum

So Australians are asked to vote to change the Constitution when we do not know what we are voting for.

Are we really this stupid?

The lawyers have red it and said Australia will be Governed by the High Court not by Democracy because all laws and legislation concern Aborigines.

They are not our friends and just want to destroy Australia and not make it a better place - and the Voice is step 1 and step 2 and 3 is "Truth Telling" and "Makaratta" or Revenge/ Payback

We are going into this blind deaf and dumb as well as stupid


Voice model to be decided after referendum
The Albanese government will not introduce legislation on a ­proposed model for the Indigenous voice until after Australians go to a referendum in the second half of 2023.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=TAWEB_WRE170_a_GGL...





You'd have to be completely retarded to vote yes to something that you have no understanding of, or what it will end up being. That is just plain farrking dumb.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51444
Gender: male
Re: The Voice Kool-Aid
Reply #134 - Dec 14th, 2022 at 2:48pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 14th, 2022 at 2:04pm:
The High Court was voted into the Constitution with no detail of how it was to be structured or how it was to operate.  Yet Australians took the Government of the day on trust and enacted one of the most efficient and trusted organisations in existence.  The Voice is similar.  We have no or little detail, we are expected to take the Government on trust and have enacted a good means of representing the needs and requirements of the Indigenous People of Australia.  We have the nay-sayers, the time wasters, the Racists spreading their lies about what The Voice will be and what it's powers will entail.  Oh, dearie, dearie, me and they expect us to believe them and their claims?  Bullshit.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Utter Bbwianesque nonsense. Laughable, shifty, smug, fuddy-duddy stupidity.

https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Cons...

The establishment of the High Court was not a constitutional amendment sought by the government of thd day and endorsed by the people. It was not "voted into the Constitution".  There was NO federal government of the day, numpty, since the main objective of the constitution was to establish the terms of ederation of the six colonies. So Australians didn't "take the Government of the day on trust" as there was no such government to be taken in trust or otherwise, only six separate colonial governments.

The the Voice is absolutely nothing like the Australian court system. The Voice is a race based body with undefined limitations. The jurisdiction of the High Court is clearly defined in the constitution.

What are the lies that the Racists are spreading about the Voice, Bbwian? And if "we have no or little detail", how do you know they are lies? How could you know?

On what grounds do you entrust the government to enact good means? What happens when the 'Tories' get back into government? Will you be just as trusting with them as with SocialistLabor/Greens?


Tuttutsie Bbwian hiding from facts:
https://mobile.twitter.com/SteveInmanUIC/status/1602866467716091904
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 14th, 2022 at 4:44pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 17
Send Topic Print