AusGeoff wrote on Dec 10
th, 2022 at 1:48am:
ShellShilo wrote on Dec 9
th, 2022 at 4:52pm:
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 9
th, 2022 at 3:01am:
You seem unable to
comprehend that had you been vaccinated, there's every chance you would not have contracted COVID in the first place.
But having been infected once, you now carry a greater risk to your immune system if you're infected a second time, and even more so if it's from a
future far more virulent form of the virus—which is fully expected.
You're just a buffoon, clearly out of your depth in any meaningful debate.
I am certainly no buffoon...
Uh... these comments were in response to Sir Lastnail, not you Shell.
I understand. But I also agree with his very rational ideas and comments. Which would make me also a buffoon, and a Covid-19 anti-vaxxer. Or, any other ad hoc label you need to tag anyone who has a differing opinion. Or, indeed would challenge your beliefs and worldviews.
Respectfully, your first two paragraphs are absolute nonsense.
One, the SARS-CoV-2 virus will reproduce/replicate within the cell at generally the same rate. Regardless, if the host is vaccinated or not. Two, viruses don't choose which host to infect based on the host's vaccine status. Three, vaccines alone CAN'T prevent anyone from becoming infected, period! Five, the chances of becoming infected is random for everyone. Six, why would you expect to see a more virulent strain of this virus?
In fact, no mutated variance of a virus is ever more virulent than its original strain(SARS-1 vs. SARS-CoV-2). Maybe you can name any of the variances and sub-variances of any SARS-CoV-2 virus, from Alpha to Omicron, that is more virulent than SARS-1? Or, is more virulent than the Measles? You clearly don't understand the biological importance of the Law of Natural Compensation. Seven, those unvaccinated who are infected, will develop natural acquired antibodies. These antibodies don't care how the pathogen mutates. So, there would be LESS chance of being reinfected by any of the viral variances.
This is an example of why having a little knowledge, without a complete understanding, can be a dangerous thing. It just feeds into the hysterics of manufactured truths.
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 10
th, 2022 at 12:41am:
• Firstly, why exactly do you believe the graph is "fake"?
The graph is not fake. It is contrived and irrelevant to Australia. It's data is only relevant to the US. And even there it is misleading. You can't just take misleading data from another country, and just assume that it will apply to your own country.
Thank you for providing the source of the graph. Now I understand WHY the data made no sense in Australia. Did you fail to mention that the unvaccinated included those who were not FULLY vaccinated? So, technically your 8-1 AMERICAN death ratio isn't accurate. Most of the unvaccinated, also included those who were NOT fully vaccinated(less than 2 shots). In Australia, there is no data to support for this claim. This inaccurate ratio between vaccinated deaths and unvaccinated deaths just doesn't exist in Australia.
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 10
th, 2022 at 12:41am:
• Do you believe that the CDC are willfully publishing false data?
No. But they would certainly provide misleading and incomplete information. They would also lie by omission and inference. Especially, if they want to keep their fundings coming in(Bloomberg, Gates, the US Congress, etc.).
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 10
th, 2022 at 12:41am:
• Do you not trust Scientific American as a reputable publication?
Yes, I do trust SA as a reputable publication. But if they tell me that the sky was falling(or anything that is intuitively wrong), I would not blindly accept this as gospel. I would still do my due diligence, and use my own cognitive abilities and common sense.
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 10
th, 2022 at 12:41am:
• Finally, why do you consider Pfizer vaccines to be "poison"?
Because these vaccines are classified as a poison in all States and Territories in Australia. Also, because these vaccines require the signing of a consent form, must be prescribed by a doctor, and the fact that you need to be a licensed medical practitioner to administer them.
AusGeoff wrote on Dec 10
th, 2022 at 12:41am:
• Can you tell me what you believe the vaccines contain that would make them so?
Although the vaccines contain SM-102(a lipid that stabilizes the mRNA molecule, with the chloroform supposedly filtered out), or the fact that ALL ingredients are NOT required to be listed, it is what the vaccine doesn't contain that is my concern.
These vaccines are somehow able to bypass all of the cell's editing protocols, that should prevent the cell from making any foreign viral spike proteins? These vaccines do not contain any live or augmented SARS-CoV-2 viruses or antigens. So, the antibodies that are produced will only be antigen-specific, limited spectrum, and high affinity antibodies. Not the type of antibodies our immune system needs.
Remember, if you can get cells to start producing any foreign proteins you can code for in a lab, you can now control/change the cell's normal biological function. This can open the ethical floodgates for abuse and selectivity. Remember, poisons and venoms are also made of proteins!
Forum
Pages: 
