|
Brian Ross
|
Frank wrote on Dec 5 th, 2022 at 12:54pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4 th, 2022 at 7:36pm: Gnads wrote on Dec 4 th, 2022 at 6:49pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4 th, 2022 at 5:08pm: Frank wrote on Dec 4 th, 2022 at 5:04pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4 th, 2022 at 3:45pm: Boris wrote on Dec 4 th, 2022 at 2:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 4 th, 2022 at 12:12pm: Here we have, Matty, parroting his bullshit about Cannibalism amongst modern day Indigenous Australians, all without any proof. He throws in names, a few accounts from other a century ago and assumes we should believe him. The skeptical amongst us keep asking for evidence. Does he provide any? No, he doesn't, he just keeps on parroting his bullshit. He acts like a mentally deranged Racist. Tsk, tsk, tsk... So this is lies? Mr. White has informed me that the natives south of the Carpentarian Gulf also are cannibals to some extent. They never kill anybody for the purpose of eating him, but the women eat those who die a natural death ; near Moreton Bay the dead are also eaten, and by their own relatives. In Western Queensland, at Westlands station on Thompson river, a woman belonging to a tribe of civilised blacks gave birth to a so-called half-caste child— that is, the offspring of a black m other and a white father. Such half-breeds are not as a rule much liked, and are therefore usually killed by the blacks who are in the first stages of civilisation. In this instance the blacks had indeed been in long intercourse with white people, and still the child was killed. It was perm itted to live about three weeks, but one day one of the men put his hand round its neck and held it up till it was choked to death. Thereupon it was roasted on the fire and distributed among those present, and eaten most greedily. Many of the white people at the station were witnesses of this event. It is not known whether the mother in this instance ate any of the flesh of her child or not.Among cannibals : an account of four years' travels in Australia and of camp life with the Aborigines of Queensland / by Carl Lumholtz https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/5536/WEbaRN.pngFirst published in 1889. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Well by that idiotic token, forget the 40-50,000 years wheeze, Bbwian Totally irrelevant if 140 years is. https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/5536/WEbaRN.pngBoring and childish. Tsk, tsk, tsk... No - it actually counters your BS precisely. https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/5536/WEbaRN.pngBoring and childish. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Explain yourself, Bbwian, dont just hide behind your idiofic yawns. Why do you dismiss 140 year old documented evidence with your customary limp flick of the wrist but not 40,000 year old unwritten hearsay not documented in any way until about ... er.... 140 or so years ago?? Why do you engage in endless, childish, ad huminem insults, Soren? Tsk, tsk, tsk...
|