The Heller decision of 2008 completely re defined the meaning of the second amendment on political / monitory grounds.
Quote:A well regulated Militia
Strongly infers regulations and this view was supported in many supreme court rulings.
Concealed carry - Clearly isn't specified anywhere in the amendment, it is something just made up by the corrupt court.
..the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Can you show where this is saying that guns can be concealed ? Where does it say that there can be no rules applied to gun ownership ?
In 2008 for the first time it was decided that:protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home
It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated.
That is that Before 2008 the 2nd amendment meant what the words it is made up of say that it means. From 2008 the first sentence in the 2nd Amendment was completely nullified to the point where it is meaningless. The connection to guns and the Militia was removed. They added self defence which was never connected to the second amendment before it was re defined in 2008.
It also confirmed Gun regulation as an allowed part of the 2nd amendment. They have nullified this ever since.
The fact is that in 1791 the Militia was real they did draw their recruits from the community and they did need to be armed. The undeniable fact is that the now called prefatory clause was meant literally at the time of writing. The 2008 decision was and is a sham orchestrated for the gun lobby.