Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 ... 52
Send Topic Print
Australia (Read 33200 times)
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44057
Re: Australia
Reply #480 - Jul 7th, 2024 at 12:45pm
 
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2758
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Australia
Reply #481 - Jul 7th, 2024 at 6:55pm
 
I’ve got a good idea, reinstitute the seperate womens’ service, it wasn’t perfect but it was better than the current system.
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44057
Re: Australia
Reply #482 - Jul 7th, 2024 at 9:46pm
 
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 6:55pm:
I’ve got a good idea, reinstitute the seperate womens’ service, it wasn’t perfect but it was better than the current system.


Debatable.  The present system makes women the equal of men.  The old system made them officer's mattresses.  I have worked under both and I much preferred the later system where everybody was equal.  What has to happen is for men to respect the women. 
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2758
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Australia
Reply #483 - Jul 8th, 2024 at 9:09am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 9:46pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 6:55pm:
I’ve got a good idea, reinstitute the seperate womens’ service, it wasn’t perfect but it was better than the current system.


Debatable.  The present system makes women the equal of men.  The old system made them officer's mattresses.  I have worked under both and I much preferred the later system where everybody was equal.  What has to happen is for men to respect the women. 

Things have certainly changed, I remember my boss, the Armourer Sgt. getting hauled over the coals for letting a WRAC fire a rifle, she came to the range to deliver a message and asked if she could have a shot.
But men and women will never be really equal in the Army, physical attributes will see to that.
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44057
Re: Australia
Reply #484 - Jul 8th, 2024 at 2:08pm
 
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 9:09am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 9:46pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 6:55pm:
I’ve got a good idea, reinstitute the seperate womens’ service, it wasn’t perfect but it was better than the current system.


Debatable.  The present system makes women the equal of men.  The old system made them officer's mattresses.  I have worked under both and I much preferred the later system where everybody was equal.  What has to happen is for men to respect the women. 

Things have certainly changed, I remember my boss, the Armourer Sgt. getting hauled over the coals for letting a WRAC fire a rifle, she came to the range to deliver a message and asked if she could have a shot.
But men and women will never be really equal in the Army, physical attributes will see to that.


Problem is, your basing your attitudes on small, slim, girls, rather than the big beefy ones.  The big beefier girls are pretty much the equal of men.  I have worked with both and I prefer the bigger women for their physical attributes.  The smaller ones will give it a go as well but don't last the distance.  I've seen men worked into the dirt matched by big girls.  I remember one woman held the record for the changing of a truck tyre, including taking it off the rim, in Adelaide for a couple of years.  Women, if given a chance can match or exceed men.
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2758
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Australia
Reply #485 - Jul 8th, 2024 at 3:34pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 2:08pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 9:09am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 9:46pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 6:55pm:
I’ve got a good idea, reinstitute the seperate womens’ service, it wasn’t perfect but it was better than the current system.


Debatable.  The present system makes women the equal of men.  The old system made them officer's mattresses.  I have worked under both and I much preferred the later system where everybody was equal.  What has to happen is for men to respect the women. 

Things have certainly changed, I remember my boss, the Armourer Sgt. getting hauled over the coals for letting a WRAC fire a rifle, she came to the range to deliver a message and asked if she could have a shot.
But men and women will never be really equal in the Army, physical attributes will see to that.


Problem is, your basing your attitudes on small, slim, girls, rather than the big beefy ones.  The big beefier girls are pretty much the equal of men.  I have worked with both and I prefer the bigger women for their physical attributes.  The smaller ones will give it a go as well but don't last the distance.  I've seen men worked into the dirt matched by big girls.  I remember one woman held the record for the changing of a truck tyre, including taking it off the rim, in Adelaide for a couple of years.  Women, if given a chance can match or exceed men.

No, I base my attitude on the average and once a month men are not subject to the possible, or actual, debilitating effects of PMT.
Which in some cases has been so severe as to make the sufferer mentally unstable.
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44057
Re: Australia
Reply #486 - Jul 8th, 2024 at 6:33pm
 
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 3:34pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 2:08pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 9:09am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 9:46pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 6:55pm:
I’ve got a good idea, reinstitute the seperate womens’ service, it wasn’t perfect but it was better than the current system.


Debatable.  The present system makes women the equal of men.  The old system made them officer's mattresses.  I have worked under both and I much preferred the later system where everybody was equal.  What has to happen is for men to respect the women. 

Things have certainly changed, I remember my boss, the Armourer Sgt. getting hauled over the coals for letting a WRAC fire a rifle, she came to the range to deliver a message and asked if she could have a shot.
But men and women will never be really equal in the Army, physical attributes will see to that.


Problem is, your basing your attitudes on small, slim, girls, rather than the big beefy ones.  The big beefier girls are pretty much the equal of men.  I have worked with both and I prefer the bigger women for their physical attributes.  The smaller ones will give it a go as well but don't last the distance.  I've seen men worked into the dirt matched by big girls.  I remember one woman held the record for the changing of a truck tyre, including taking it off the rim, in Adelaide for a couple of years.  Women, if given a chance can match or exceed men.

No, I base my attitude on the average and once a month men are not subject to the possible, or actual, debilitating effects of PMT.
Which in some cases has been so severe as to make the sufferer mentally unstable.


You are speaking of the exceptional.  At the the same time, some women become uncontrollable and aggressive due to PMT.  Again, that is exceptional.  Most women are quite OK with their menstruation.  Again your talking about the exceptional cases, not the normal.   Why should we make policies on the basis of the exceptional rather than the norm?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2758
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Australi
Reply #487 - Jul 8th, 2024 at 9:51pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 6:33pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 3:34pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 2:08pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 8th, 2024 at 9:09am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 9:46pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Jul 7th, 2024 at 6:55pm:
I’ve got a good idea, reinstitute the seperate womens’ service, it wasn’t perfect but it was better than the current system.


Debatable.  The present system makes women the equal of men.  The old system made them officer's mattresses.  I have worked under both and I much preferred the later system where everybody was equal.  What has to happen is for men to respect the women. 

Things have certainly changed, I remember my boss, the Armourer Sgt. getting hauled over the coals for letting a WRAC fire a rifle, she came to the range to deliver a message and asked if she could have a shot.
But men and women will never be really equal in the Army, physical attributes will see to that.


Problem is, your basing your attitudes on small, slim, girls, rather than the big beefy ones.  The big beefier girls are pretty much the equal of men.  I have worked with both and I prefer the bigger women for their physical attributes.  The smaller ones will give it a go as well but don't last the distance.  I've seen men worked into the dirt matched by big girls.  I remember one woman held the record for the changing of a truck tyre, including taking it off the rim, in Adelaide for a couple of years.  Women, if given a chance can match or exceed men.

No, I base my attitude on the average and once a month men are not subject to the possible, or actual, debilitating effects of PMT.
Which in some cases has been so severe as to make the sufferer mentally unstable.


You are speaking of the exceptional.  At the the same time, some women become uncontrollable and aggressive due to PMT.  Again, that is exceptional.  Most women are quite OK with their menstruation.  Again your talking about the exceptional cases, not the normal.   Why should we make policies on the basis of the exceptional rather than the norm?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Because the exceptional nature of PMT has been recognised at law for centuries and it exists and PMT can arise and have a different effect month to month.
Plus the sexual urge can be very strong, for the sake of security, especially in danger areas, I’d never put a man and a woman on sentry together, just as we never put homosexuals together.
If they wanted to share a two man tent that was their business but they’d have to put up with being woken at different times to stand guard.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 8th, 2024 at 9:56pm by Sir Eoin O Fada »  

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44057
Re: Australia
Reply #488 - Jul 11th, 2024 at 1:26pm
 
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Laugh till you cry
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male
Australia's record $37 billion defense budget
Reply #489 - Jul 11th, 2024 at 9:38am
 
War and Peace? Nobody is talking peace and friendship, only war and enemies.

Australia needs to protect itself against an enemy it is creating.

Defence spending is rising because Australia is supporting the actions of Genocide Joe Biden who has fomented more wars and chaos in the world than any other POTUS.

Australia's purported enemy is its largest trading partner. Australia's economy would cave in if there was a war against China.

"China is Australia's largest two-way trading partner, accounting for 27 per cent of our goods and services trade with the world in 2023."

https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2024/05/15/australia-unveils-rec...

Quote:
Australia unveils record $37 billion defense budget

By Gordon Arthur, Wednesday, May 15, 2024

CHRISTCHURCH, New Zealand — Australia will spend a record AU$55.7 billion (U.S. $36.8 billion) on defense during the next fiscal year, according to budget documents unveiled May 14.

The figure equates to 2.02% of gross domestic product and represents a 6.3% increase from last year.

Australia’s national defense strategy released last month, promised a significant increase in spending, but that does not start until 2027-2028, when defense expenditure is slated to reach about AU$67.4 billion.

Beyond that, the government still has a ways to go to hit its defense spending goal of AU$100 billion by 2033-2034, which would be 2.3% of GDP.

In this latest budget release for the 2024-2025 time frame, the government has set aside AU$16.7 billion for equipment acquisitions in the coming fiscal year, plus another AU$17.2 billion to sustain existing assets.


The Navy receives a significant allocation of AU$10.7 billion. Nuclear-powered submarines are starting to consume an enormous portion of the budget as the trilateral AUKUS agreement progresses.

Notably, spending on nuclear submarines will snowball from last year’s AU$475 million to AU$2.8 billion in the coming year, eventually reaching AU$4.97 billion in 2027-2028.

By comparison, six Hunter-class frigates and six Arafura-class offshore patrol vessels are to receive AU$813 million and AU$587 million, respectively.

The budget makes no reference to 11 new general-purpose frigates, which the government is expected to select next year.


The Army is promised AU$11.8 billion as it procures expensive assets such as Boxer armored vehicles, Redback infantry fighting vehicles, Huntsman self-propelled howitzers, High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, M1A2 Abrams tanks, National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems, and UH-60M Black Hawk and AH-64E Apache helicopters.

The Air Force will receive AU$9.5 billion, with F-35A fighter jets being its single-most expensive acquisition; nine of 72 fighters remain undelivered.

Budget figures also revealed that the arrival of four MC-55A Peregrine electronic warfare aircraft is running two years behind schedule.

The Australian Signals Directorate, which conducts foreign signals intelligence, cybersecurity and offensive cyber operations, will receive AU$2.7 billion. A further AU$1 billion is allocated to defense intelligence.


Australian military procurements are handled by the Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group. The government in 2021 formed the Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance enterprise to promote the sovereign production of missiles and munitions. Together, they will receive AU$1.3 billion in the next fiscal year.

For its part, Ukraine garnered AU$144.3 million in military aid for the year ahead, as it continues its fight against a Russian invasion.

Meanwhile, the Defence Department wants 63,597 uniformed personnel and 19,127 civilian employees in the year ahead. The Australian Defence Force, or ADF, is currently made up of about 58,600 uniformed personnel. The department is made up of about 18,000 civilian employees.

“[The Department of] Defence is forecasting to be below the required ADF fulltime workforce for 2024-25 due to high separation rates and lower than expected achievement of recruitment targets over recent years,” the budget document stated.


The new budget also noted that last year’s spending on personnel costs surpassed estimates by AU$1 billion because of increased living costs. About AU$16.7 billion is to be spent on the workforce this coming fiscal year. ...

Back to top
 

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.
 
IP Logged
 
Laugh till you cry
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male
Re: Australia's record $37 billion defense budget
Reply #490 - Jul 11th, 2024 at 11:57am
 
"Three decades ago the national merchant fleet numbered about 100. Now it's just 14. That's despite being an island continent where 99% of imports and exports are transported by sea, with thousands of large commercial ships operating in Australian waters. May 1, 2019"

This information is 5 years old which means that the fleet may now be less than 14.

If there is an outbreak of war Australia will be dependent on ships owned by foreigners.

Why has Australia's fleet shrunk? Laws and labor regulations make Australian-owned shipping uneconomic.

Why doesn't Australia enforce Australian labor laws on foreign ships entering Australian ports? Because the ships would stop coming because the Australian trade route would be uneconomic.

Its likely that China owns most of the ships on the Australian trade routes.
Back to top
 

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44057
Re: Australia
Reply #491 - Jul 11th, 2024 at 11:20pm
 
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44057
Re: Australia
Reply #492 - Jul 12th, 2024 at 11:52am
 
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Vic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8348
Melbourne Victoria
Gender: male
Re: Australia
Reply #493 - Jul 12th, 2024 at 2:23pm
 
From “The Pineapple Express” (which Defence tried unsuccessfully to have closed down on Facebook)

"You can’t make this stuff up…
The same person who just took over the position of Chief of Defence Force (David Johnston) is the same person who nominated Angus Campbell for his DSC. This is why the inquiry into the awarding of medals in Defence is needed.
Also, the approving authority for the nomination was LTGEN Brian Power. He approved the nomination in October 2011. He was then upgraded to an Officer of the Order of Australia in the 2012 Australia Day Honours List. We’d be extremely interested in knowing who nominated him for that 🧐 “


Back to top
 

Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44057
Re: Australia
Reply #494 - Jul 12th, 2024 at 3:20pm
 
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 ... 52
Send Topic Print