Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Do you want royalty banished from our political system?
*** This poll has now closed ***


Yes    
  15 (48.4%)
No    
  16 (51.6%)




Total votes: 31
« Created by: Bobby. on: Sep 11th, 2022 at 5:03pm »

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 27
Send Topic Print
Time for a republic. (Read 8855 times)
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111572
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The British Bullshitarchy
Reply #165 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:12am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 7:54am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 7:06am:
Who voted to retain the British Bullshitarchy?

There's 12 of you apparently according to the above Poll. Show your face and state your case. Go on. I would love to hear your reasons.

Note : I'm RIGHT wing and my husband is LEFT wing and NEITHER of us want this inbred family of self entitled bludgers implicates in our flag, our anthem or our political system. So this isn't a Left Wing/Right Wing driven discussion.


Edit : Oh how rude of me: Good morning everyone!



There is 12 pages of people explaining the case Lisa. It boils down to absence of a case for change. Even with Bobby's attempt to frame the question as favourably as possible for a republic, no-one is falling for it.



The vote is actually very close 11 to 12.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111572
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #166 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:14am
 

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111572
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #167 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:15am
 
Ladies -
if you meet King Charles you'll have to curtsy.
I'm afraid to say - the law is the law.


...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111572
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #168 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:16am
 

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111572
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #169 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:20am
 
https://sluggerotoole.com/2018/04/18/strange-women-lying-in-ponds-distributing-s...

    King Arthur: The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I am your king.

    Dennis: Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.

    Arthur: Be quiet!

    Dennis: You can’t expect to wield supreme executive power just ’cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!

    Arthur: Shut up!

    Dennis: I mean, if I went around saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they’d put me away!


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59987
Here
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #170 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:22am
 
I think we need a compelling logical case for change not a justification for not changing.

We need to see a solid workable model that people would be willing to support.

Note: what we have is one of the most reliable robust most successful systems on the planet. We are for instance far superior to the republic of the USA (just look at their current mess), We are better than any Banana republic, better than any dictatorial republic. We are at worst on par with the very best world systems. If we change why would it need to be to a republic model which have proven a real mixed bag clearly with more failure stories than successes.

We need to see some form of cost justification. What is the bang for Bucks in all this. Most of the past discussion seems to conclude that we spend a shite load of money and if we are real lucky we don't lose too much.

We need to see critical role functions, expected improvement analysis and control mechanisms.

When changing from something which is very very good the risk is that you have a lot more to lose than gain.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111572
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #171 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:43am
 
Dnarever wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:22am:
I think we need a compelling logical case for change not a justification for not changing.

We need to see a solid workable model that people would be willing to support.

Note: what we have is one of the most reliable robust most successful systems on the planet. We are for instance far superior to the republic of the USA (just look at their current mess), We are better than any Banana republic, better than any dictatorial republic. We are at worst on par with the very best world systems. If we change why would it need to be to a republic model which have proven a real mixed bag clearly with more failure stories than successes.

We need to see some form of cost justification. What is the bang for Bucks in all this. Most of the past discussion seems to conclude that we spend a shite load of money and if we are real lucky we don't lose too much.

We need to see critical role functions, expected improvement analysis and control mechanisms.

When changing from something which is very very good the risk is that you have a lot more to lose than gain.




But my opening post gave one example of the system not working -
care to comment?


Quote:
We had an example of an outrageous abuse of power that
Scott Morrison was made a minister of 5 portfolios
in such secrecy that not even his own ministers knew -
let alone the public.
That must have been because the Governor General
was in fear of losing his job if he didn't agree?
That is something you'd expect to find in a
banana republic or a 3rd world country.
It's totally unacceptable.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: The British Bullshitarchy
Reply #172 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:58am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:12am:
freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 7:54am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 7:06am:
Who voted to retain the British Bullshitarchy?

There's 12 of you apparently according to the above Poll. Show your face and state your case. Go on. I would love to hear your reasons.

Note : I'm RIGHT wing and my husband is LEFT wing and NEITHER of us want this inbred family of self entitled bludgers implicates in our flag, our anthem or our political system. So this isn't a Left Wing/Right Wing driven discussion.


Edit : Oh how rude of me: Good morning everyone!



There is 12 pages of people explaining the case Lisa. It boils down to absence of a case for change. Even with Bobby's attempt to frame the question as favourably as possible for a republic, no-one is falling for it.



The vote is actually very close 11 to 12.


Wow! No flies on you, Bobby!

Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111572
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #173 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:04am
 
issuevoter wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:58am:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:12am:
freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 7:54am:
Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 7:06am:
Who voted to retain the British Bullshitarchy?

There's 12 of you apparently according to the above Poll. Show your face and state your case. Go on. I would love to hear your reasons.

Note : I'm RIGHT wing and my husband is LEFT wing and NEITHER of us want this inbred family of self entitled bludgers implicates in our flag, our anthem or our political system. So this isn't a Left Wing/Right Wing driven discussion.


Edit : Oh how rude of me: Good morning everyone!



There is 12 pages of people explaining the case Lisa. It boils down to absence of a case for change. Even with Bobby's attempt to frame the question as favourably as possible for a republic, no-one is falling for it.



The vote is actually very close 11 to 12.


Wow! No flies on you, Bobby!




But FD said  "no-one is falling for it"
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13182
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #174 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:15am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:20am:
I mean, if I went around saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they’d put me away!

William the Conqueror said he was king of England because the old dying king mumbled something to him and the same to Harold. George Washington said he lobbed more bullets than the Poms and it's all mine..mine !
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13182
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #175 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:22am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:43am:
We had an example of an outrageous abuse of power that
Scott Morrison was made a minister of 5 portfolios
in such secrecy that not even his own ministers knew -
let alone the public.

This outrageous abuse of hardworking taxpayers is intolerable. Just because he's voted in by the people for his popular policies for the population
...
erm cof cof
that's being a republic ..whoops
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51444
Gender: male
Re: The British Bullshitarchy
Reply #176 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:54am
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 7:06am:
Who voted to retain the British Bullshitarchy?

There's 12 of you apparently according to the above Poll. Show your face and state your case. Go on. I would love to hear your reasons.

Note : I'm RIGHT wing and my husband is LEFT wing and NEITHER of us want this inbred family of self entitled bludgers implicates in our flag, our anthem or our political system. So this isn't a Left Wing/Right Wing driven discussion.


Edit : Oh how rude of me: Good morning everyone!


John Smith wrote on Sep 11th, 2022 at 8:50pm:
which is not difficult it's just a ceremonial role. Even you could manage it sore end, with a little help



So you just want a bogan to cut ribbons. And that would settle your soul and make the world right for you and bobby et al.  Not having a bogan ribbon cutter grates your sense of national pride. An Australian ribbon cutter expresses, finally and fully, who you are and puts your mind at ease with yourself as an Australian.

What is an Australian? Born here? Not born here but has passport holder after 3 year residency? Speaks no English but has an Australian passport? 4th + generation Anglo? Part Aboriginal? Italian mother, Greek father? Temporary resident for 6 years? Overseas born to one Australian parent? What?


What IS an Australian for HOS purposes?  The same people who denigrate nationalism in every other context are fervent nationalists when it come to the HOS.  The same people who identify Australians as beer swilling racists are calling for "one of us' to be HOS.


Also
How to select a HOS if hereditary monarchy is to be replaced? How do you make the choice as non-political as what you want to replace?  The biggest problem with the Americal model is that it combines the HOS and the head of government in the same person.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13182
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #177 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 11:59am
 
They probably won't give Trump a firing squad but Charles well knows about Charles I being executed and Louis XVI at the guillotine. This will focus his mind more than back-stabbing in the Parliament party rooms.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51444
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #178 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:23pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Sep 13th, 2022 at 10:22am:
I think we need a compelling logical case for change not a justification for not changing.

We need to see a solid workable model that people would be willing to support.

Note: what we have is one of the most reliable robust most successful systems on the planet. We are for instance far superior to the republic of the USA (just look at their current mess), We are better than any Banana republic, better than any dictatorial republic. We are at worst on par with the very best world systems. If we change why would it need to be to a republic model which have proven a real mixed bag clearly with more failure stories than successes.

We need to see some form of cost justification. What is the bang for Bucks in all this. Most of the past discussion seems to conclude that we spend a shite load of money and if we are real lucky we don't lose too much.

We need to see critical role functions, expected improvement analysis and control mechanisms.

When changing from something which is very very good the risk is that you have a lot more to lose than gain.



I agree ducky.


Here's an Idea: we should invite Princess Mary's second born, Isabella, to be our monarch. She is Australian.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13182
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Time for a republic.
Reply #179 - Sep 13th, 2022 at 12:29pm
 
Cnut (/kəˈnjuːt/; Old English: Cnut cyning;  died 12 November 1035, also known as Cnut the Great and Canute, was King of England from 1016, King of Denmark from 1018.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 27
Send Topic Print