Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 155 156 157 
Send Topic Print
Cultural Marxism is everywhere. (Read 128554 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59593
Gender: male
Re: Cultural Marxism is everywhere.
Reply #2340 - Yesterday at 7:59pm
 
Dnarever wrote Yesterday at 5:01pm:
Frank wrote Yesterday at 4:34pm:
Dnarever wrote Yesterday at 2:39pm:
Well Frank the two previous posts do not have a single word related to Cultural Marxism. They refer to some connection between what Karl Marx said around 150 years ago to CRT (Critical race theory and  Critical legal studies) CLS. which on the face seems absurd. However how it was derived does in no way mitigate that these theories seem to have substance. These ideas could well have been developed from any group relying on thought backed by fact.

Though it does seem a stretch to relate it back to Karl Marx's ecanomic theory, An English ecanomic theorist who died in 1883 and had said nothing even remorely related. It was never easy to take the 20th century people who were associated with Marxism to be taken seriously when their discussions in these areas had nothing to do with marxism at all. They were clearly pushing theor own barrows.


Marx was not an 'English economc theorist.' Your ignorance and your pride in it, are limitless.



Marxism is a method of social, cultural, economic, historical etc analysis.

It is not entirely Marx's invention. Dialectics has been around since Socrates. Marx took Hegel's dialectical analysis of history (and culture) and 'turned it upside down, by giving it a materialist foundation (instead of Hegel's idea-ism)

You do not need to have the word 'culture' in every discussion of history, society, politics, art etc since these are ALL, tegether, form culture. In Marxist terminology, culture is the superstructure on top of the economic, material foundations. the latter determining the former. That method of analyisng any subject - dialectical materialism, historical materialism - is the Marxist method and it is present in every academic discipline, even the hard sciences, but very wide spread in the soft and pseudo sciences like sociology and in the arts, histoy and literature, journalism, social work, education.

It long predates any narrow, American  "cultural Marxism'  that wikipedia talks about. 


Quote:
Marx was not an 'English


Correct he was German but lived in London for 35 years.

It is insane to believe that there is a cultural marxism arm that has members in the Marxist family or that there is even a marxist family of organisations.

Marx's comments relating to culture was simply to explain it as a tool used by capitalists.

There simply has never been a marxist group dedicated to Culture. There has never been such a thing as a cultural marxist except in demented right wing fiction.

You are an ignorant idiot hung up on petty words. If Marxism is not explicitly referenced then there's nuffin' to see here.

But in your strident idiocy you do not recognise that you attribute 'right wing' or far right' or 'conservative' even when these words are not explicitly mentioned. You ARE an idiot. Ignorant, unread, unlettered - and you make up for all those shortcomings with being stridently stupid.
You have zero self-awareness, zero sense of proportion, zero learning, zero insight. All idiotic monomaniacal repetition. Wiki.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 155 156 157 
Send Topic Print