freediver wrote on Aug 21^st, 2022 at 3:33pm:


High enough to fund common prosperity.

But as Gareth Hutchens has observed: the neoliberal toad Philip Lowe should be exposed for pitting taxpayers against taxpayers ...with the most powerful group invariably winning....

...because Lowe can fund public policies himself (up to a limit defined by the nation's productive capacity, of course).

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-07-24/rba-review-will-it-consider-how-money-is-...

It's the last taboo in central banking. So will the RBA review look at how money is created?

Quote:


Do your words have any genuine meaning at all? Or do you just sprout banal CCP propaganda?

mothra wrote on Aug 21^st, 2022 at 8:09am:



Nah ... you beat him by about 10 lengths.

thegreatdivide wrote on Aug 21^st, 2022 at 3:50pm:

Albo n Tania wouldn't go anywhere near the Alice and i don't blame them. I would like to see them in Pt Augusta (pordagudda) for a nice smoking ceremony.

thegreatdivide wrote on Aug 21^st, 2022 at 6:27pm:

I would round them up hose them down for starters.

Gnads wrote on Aug 21^st, 2022 at 5:36pm:



I'll add to that .....

Here is the statement direct from the great divide:- 

The voice will do it by stopping a neoliberal ideologue like Howard from dismantling a successful scheme like the CDEP.

I rest my case - it is clear that the voice - in the minds of many at the very least - has a veto where and when it chooses.  Since I view divide as a New Labor schill trying desperately to sell this thing - clearly that is the intent behind the whole thing - if not in the initial stages - then certainly by developing rights, privileges and powers along the way - one at a time like boiling frogs.

The 'mission statement' of the Voice project says so itself:- that government may amend its activities etc from time to time...

This is what happened with feminism and domestic violence legislations - and clearly this is what will happen with any other demon from the Keep given embodiment ....

Clearly this is not some new genie you want to let out of the bottle.

I've tried to explain to her and others here that insulting others and name-calling is a guaranteed way to not only develop your own opposition, but to cement that opposition into opposing what it is you stand for.

I even quoted Richard K Barnet's book "Intervention and Revolution", specifically where he explores why an individual becomes an insurgent.  Basically he says you can generationally starve his own, abuse them, neglect them, disempower them and so forth - but the last thing you ever want to do is insult him.  Do that and he will take to the jungles and fight you to the death.

The stock in trade of the Woke Left is insult, abuse, name-calling and so forth... along with the deliberate disenfranchisement of any who oppose their New City Hall views openly while holding a job near them.... the public service springs to mind.

Take a look at the dworkins here who do exactly that to promote their ideology.... case proven.