Sir lastnail wrote on Aug 7^th, 2022 at 10:02am:


I'm NEVER WITH Drunk. The dumbarse is always following my arse around online. At times he meets Snorty, Groggy and Methra up my arse and that's when we have a 4 ID online collision and I turn around and see all 4 dheads lined up behind me and my sides hurt from laughing so much. These 4 ids seriously love my arse. I must be farting their brand of perfume 😂🤣😆

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 7^th, 2022 at 12:52pm:


Why you waste your time with Monk ? He's not worth the bullets used to shoot him. Hopefully he is all vaxed up to the max and that will do the job

AusGeoff wrote on Aug 7^th, 2022 at 2:54am:


No. There are many there with clinical qualifications:

Dr. Paul E. Alexander, clinical epidemiologist, former WHO-PAHO and US HHS consultant/senior Covid Pandemic advisor

Dr. Mobeen Syed, physician, computer scientist, CEO of DrBeen Corp (US), clinical consultant

Dr. Alberto Pupi, professor of clinical pathophysiology, University of Florence Medical College, Italy

Dr. Eric Wargotz, Clinical Professor of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, the George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC

Dr. Ram Duriseti, clinical associate professor, Stanford University Division of Emergency Medicine, Palo Alto, California

Dr. Spiro P. Pantazatos, Assistant Professor of Clinical Neurobiology (Psychiatry) at Columbia University

Dr. Marie Kuffner, former professor of clinical anesthesiology and former chief of staff, UCLA Medical Center; past president of the California Medical Association


Quote:


The real quacks are in the medical profession you're referring to:

"The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful."

- - Arnold S. Relman, former editor, New England Journal of Medicine

Quote:


I've misrepresented nothing. That's what he said.

And:

The Bill Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) has funded two organizations that over the past five years have played a significant role in (India)’s immunization programme and are both under fire for conflict of interest. The organizations are GAVI (earlier known as Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization), a global aid organization that specializes in vaccination, and Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), a public-private partnership society that BMGF co-founded with the UPA government in 2006.

Activists allege that these two institutions have a working relationship with pharma companies. The main charge against GAVI is that it has representatives from pharmaceutical companies on its board while the PHFI accepts grants from pharma companies. “BMGF and GAVI are pushing the [vaccine] agenda with governments around the world, including India,” says Ritu Priya Mehrotra, professor of Social Medicine and Community Health and School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi. The community health activist says the biotechnology industry was pushing more and more vaccines into India and that the health ministry was not ensuring that adequate testing was done before recommending their use in government programmes...

The GAVI board comprises of a representative each of the pharma industry from the industrialized and developing countries, a sore point with some experts from the aid world. In an article in the The Guardian three years ago, leaders of international aid agencies such as Oxfam and MSF said the representatives of companies needed to step down from the GAVI board. “Pharmaceutical companies’ representation on GAVI’s board creates a conflict of interest. The current structure is far too cosy,” said the article quoting Mohga Kamal-Yanni, a senior policy adviser with Oxfam...

Similar controversies on proximity with pharma companies and conflict of interest have been raised about PHFI. While PHFI is engaged in public health and is also partnering the government in UIP, it has accepted grants from a number of pharma companies, including vaccine manufacturers...

Public health activist and pediatrician Dr Arun Gupta says PHFI’s links with pharma companies and McKinsey are unacceptable. “It is a clear conflict of interest. Neither the government nor PHFI has come out clearly and spoken of their relationship with each other... it seems to be a private club that helps pharma companies make inroads into public policy.”

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/cont...

Several such details of BMGF’s investments in vaccine manufacturing companies and other corporations are revealed in a study by David Stuckler of Harvard University in the US. The study titled ‘Global Health Philanthropy and Institutional Relationships: How should conflicts of Interest be addressed’ was published in ‘Public Library of Sciences’ in April. It is a clear case of conflict of interest because , Stuckler says.

https://www.deccanherald.com/content/166242/vaccines-gates-foundations-philanthr...

I wonder how long that will last on YT.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 7^th, 2022 at 6:38pm:

John_Taverner wrote on Aug 7^th, 2022 at 12:43pm:


Thank you for the link.    

I would say those sort of clinicians are highly scientifically trained
And maybe more reliable sources as they are not subject to capture

Pfizer got all the funding
Tens of billions of dollars under operation warp speed
They are a financial organisation of course so nobody at pfizer understands any of this stuff

They distribute funding two people who put their hands up
And want to run a research project

Obviously these groups have a relationship with pfizer.

These groups can design their studies in certain mischievious ways
If for example someone has a bad reaction to vaccine 1
You can just eliminate them from the study as they are not going to have vaccine 2
And hence problem patients disappear

The FDA do not I repeat do not get the raw data
They merely get pfizer's interpretation of the data
The study data are the intellectual property of pfizer and do not have to be passed on

You may remember that the supreme court issued a subpoena for visor to provide this data
And they said it would take them approximately 75 years to comply
This is all on the public record
You are not going to hear any of this on the mainstream media
Why would you when pfizer are the largest corporate advertiser on American television

I'm not saying the vaccines don't work to some extent
I'm not saying people should not be vaccinated

I am saying that a decision has been made to not inform the public of anything that promotes vaccine hesitancy
You can make what you will of that

waggawoody wrote on Jul 28^th, 2022 at 5:57pm:


The ignorant anti vax BS is the funniest part of OzPol. LOL!!

People are DYING!! NO ONE HAS DIED BEFORE!!!