Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
More on wind turbines (Read 2966 times)
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #30 - Jun 1st, 2022 at 1:23pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 11:14am:
Johnnie wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 4:55am:
That is good going!  A lot of the time when the wind is blowing and there is full sun in SA they don't even switch on all the solar farms, for some reason those on the east coast would rather shovel dirty coal into their generators than pay for green power.


You should look at grid instability with renewables. Plus the solar companies are paid to produce whether it is actually on line or not.

"The Renewable Energy Target is a subsidy. Building new wind and solar costs more than existing coal and gas generation. The RET enables solar and wind providers to sell renewable energy certificates to make up the difference between the electricity they sell and the costs of building new power stations. The cost of the certificates—the subsidy to renewables—is paid by electricity consumers through their power bills.

This cost totals approximately $2 billion per year."

https://reneweconomy.com.au/ret-market-distorting-subsidy-renewable-energy-63472...

Australia’s fossil-fuelled power stations are currently subsidised to the tune of $7- 20 billion a year.

Grid stability has always been something to deal with, not just since renewables, the big batteries are helping to deal with that these days, so they say, along with the old methods using electrical gadgets.

When SA was running on renewables it doesn't mean the gas fired generators were switched off, they provide stability and excess was exported. It still doesn't make sense to build solar and wind farms if they have them switched off, probably more to do with economics.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21516
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #31 - Jun 1st, 2022 at 2:17pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 1:23pm:
Australia’s fossil-fuelled power stations are currently subsidised to the tune of $7- 20 billion a year



Only if normal tax deductions are used as subsidies, as per IMF, World Bank.

Gillard and Rudd even argued that.Johnnie wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 1:23pm:
Grid stability has always been something to deal with, not just since renewables, the big batteries are helping to deal with that these days, so they say, along with the old methods using electrical gadgets.



Big batteries are only useful for smoothing. They can not handle full load. New methods are being developed but they are not in wide usage.

Johnnie wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 1:23pm:
It still doesn't make sense to build solar and wind farms if they have them switched off, probably more to do with economics.


They get paid whether exported or not. The RET is the difference between sale price and build price. No sale full hit on RET.

". The RET enables solar and wind providers to sell renewable energy certificates to make up the difference between the electricity they sell and the costs of building new power stations"


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15655
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #32 - Jun 1st, 2022 at 2:45pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 1:23pm:
When SA was running on renewables it doesn't mean the gas fired generators were switched off, they provide stability and excess was exported. It still doesn't make sense to build solar and wind farms if they have them switched off, probably more to do with economics.


Everything to do with economics; inadequate PRIVATE profit-driven market economics that is.

Which is why we need the public sector to fund the smart NATIONAL grid connecting rooftop solar AND wind and solar farms, to home batteries AND large scale pumped hydro storage
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #33 - Jun 2nd, 2022 at 4:06pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 2:45pm:
Johnnie wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 1:23pm:
When SA was running on renewables it doesn't mean the gas fired generators were switched off, they provide stability and excess was exported. It still doesn't make sense to build solar and wind farms if they have them switched off, probably more to do with economics.


Everything to do with economics; inadequate PRIVATE profit-driven market economics that is.

Which is why we need the public sector to fund the smart NATIONAL grid connecting rooftop solar AND wind and solar farms, to home batteries AND large scale pumped hydro storage

How would many Lithium home batteries and pumped hydro storage compare to putting up more wind turbines, a 10MW wind farm can be built in 2 months. I would accept a free home
battery but paying $7,000 and lasting only 10yrs, maybe, is not something i would install.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15655
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #34 - Jun 5th, 2022 at 1:34pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Jun 2nd, 2022 at 4:06pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 2:45pm:
Johnnie wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 1:23pm:
When SA was running on renewables it doesn't mean the gas fired generators were switched off, they provide stability and excess was exported. It still doesn't make sense to build solar and wind farms if they have them switched off, probably more to do with economics.


Everything to do with economics; inadequate PRIVATE profit-driven market economics that is.

Which is why we need the public sector to fund the smart NATIONAL grid connecting rooftop solar AND wind and solar farms, to home batteries AND large scale pumped hydro storage

How would many Lithium home batteries and pumped hydro storage compare to putting up more wind turbines, a 10MW wind farm can be built in 2 months. I would accept a free home
battery but paying $7,000 and lasting only 10yrs, maybe, is not something i would install. 


If we are talking OZ powered by near 100% renewables ASAP, we need the vast (available)  capacity of rooftop solar,  as well as wind and solar farms.

The government can subsidize a battery industry in Oz, given we have the resources, and can also subsidize replacement costs (see MMT; if the resources are  available for purchase by the currency-issuing government , then the government can buy them with money created 'out of nothing'....which is how all money is created, a privilege reserved for private money lenders in the current dysfunctional monetary orthodoxy.  Note: the government is not increasing the money supply which would risk creating inflation,  the government is merely by-passing the market, in order to turn eg, lithium into batteries).

The barrier is dysfunctional profit-driven market economics, when it comes to provision of an essential service. 

The energy sector must be nationalized....just as Playford did in SA;  but now the situation is a transition to free sunshine and wind, as opposed to transition to cheap Leigh Creek brown coal in SA.

" In 1946, Playford created the Electricity Trust of South Australia (ETSA). He had nationalised the Adelaide Electric Supply Company, which as a private company, held a monopoly over electricity supplies in Adelaide and had refused to use the State's brown coal supply.


...because the private company wanted to maintain the fatter profits available from using more expensive black coal. Profits over people, as usual.

The ALP was delighted; they called Playford (a Liberal) the "best socialist premier" they ever had....
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 5th, 2022 at 1:45pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #35 - Jun 5th, 2022 at 5:54pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 5th, 2022 at 1:34pm:
Johnnie wrote on Jun 2nd, 2022 at 4:06pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 2:45pm:
Johnnie wrote on Jun 1st, 2022 at 1:23pm:
When SA was running on renewables it doesn't mean the gas fired generators were switched off, they provide stability and excess was exported. It still doesn't make sense to build solar and wind farms if they have them switched off, probably more to do with economics.


Everything to do with economics; inadequate PRIVATE profit-driven market economics that is.

Which is why we need the public sector to fund the smart NATIONAL grid connecting rooftop solar AND wind and solar farms, to home batteries AND large scale pumped hydro storage

How would many Lithium home batteries and pumped hydro storage compare to putting up more wind turbines, a 10MW wind farm can be built in 2 months. I would accept a free home
battery but paying $7,000 and lasting only 10yrs, maybe, is not something i would install. 


If we are talking OZ powered by near 100% renewables ASAP, we need the vast (available)  capacity of rooftop solar,  as well as wind and solar farms.

The government can subsidize a battery industry in Oz, given we have the resources, and can also subsidize replacement costs (see MMT; if the resources are  available for purchase by the currency-issuing government , then the government can buy them with money created 'out of nothing'....which is how all money is created, a privilege reserved for private money lenders in the current dysfunctional monetary orthodoxy.  Note: the government is not increasing the money supply which would risk creating inflation,  the government is merely by-passing the market, in order to turn eg, lithium into batteries).

The barrier is dysfunctional profit-driven market economics, when it comes to provision of an essential service. 

The energy sector must be nationalized....just as Playford did in SA;  but now the situation is a transition to free sunshine and wind, as opposed to transition to cheap Leigh Creek brown coal in SA.

" In 1946, Playford created the Electricity Trust of South Australia (ETSA). He had nationalised the Adelaide Electric Supply Company, which as a private company, held a monopoly over electricity supplies in Adelaide and had refused to use the State's brown coal supply.


...because the private company wanted to maintain the fatter profits available from using more expensive black coal. Profits over people, as usual.

The ALP was delighted; they called Playford (a Liberal) the "best socialist premier" they ever had....

I think they stopped using the coal from Leigh Creek in 2016 and then blew up the generators.

I reckon the home batteries are BS, along with the big batteries. The home batteries are a big outlay, nobody knows how long they will last, you need a big roof top sola to make them viable and not much good if running a big A/C etc.

You are never going to run industry on batteries, thousands would be needed to just to run a shopping centre and acres of solar panels.

Not sure what the big batteries are doing apart from providing a bit of stability which can be done by other means. All the big batteries we have wouldn't run a city for half a second, they would blow up before then anyway.

Apart from going nuclear we should run on gas, we have plenty and build more wind farms. SA has been running on 63% renewables for a few years now so not much gas is being used there.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15655
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #36 - Jun 6th, 2022 at 4:40pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Jun 5th, 2022 at 5:54pm:
I think they stopped using the coal from Leigh Creek in 2016 and then blew up the generators.


Due to the erroneous neoliberal  privatization dogma which was established in the 80's (Thatcher/Reagan/ Hawke years), overthrowing the successful post war  Keynesnian 'welfare state' public ownership policy. (because economists misunderstood the stagflation in the 70's caused by M.E oil embargo, and competition from Asia resulting in loss of 1st world industrial manufacturing). 

"The Electricity Trust of South Australia (ETSA) was the South Australian Government-owned monopoly vertically integrated electricity provider from 1946 until its privatisation in 1999".

Quote:
I reckon the home batteries are BS, along with the big batteries. The home batteries are a big outlay, nobody knows how long they will last, you need a big roof top sola to make them viable and not much good if running a big A/C etc.


Depends on individual roof areas, available sun etc:

"Can I run my air conditioner on battery power?
The short answer is yes. With the proper equipment and enough batteries, you can run your RV AC unit on batteries. In addition to the lithium batteries, you'll need an inverter to invert the DC battery power into AC power for most air conditioning units.16 Aug 2021"


Quote:
You are never going to run industry on batteries, thousands would be needed to just to run a shopping centre and acres of solar panels.


Re large grid-scale vanadium batteries, powered by long-distance inter-connectors from solar and wind farms:

"Are vanadium flow batteries the future?
"The emerging need for large-scale electricity storage makes vanadium redox flow batteries a major potential future use of vanadium," USGS wrote. "Because of their large-scale storage capacity, development of VRBs could prompt increases in the use of wind, solar, and other renewable, intermittent power sources."15 May 2022


Quote:
Not sure what the big batteries are doing apart from providing a bit of stability which can be done by other means. All the big batteries we have wouldn't run a city for half a second, they would blow up before then anyway.


Addressed above, we don't have grid scale vanadium batteries at present. And add on a few Snowy 2's for storage; should just about get us through the night and  at times when the wind isn't blowing.

Quote:
Apart from going nuclear we should run on gas, we have plenty and build more wind farms. SA has been running on 63% renewables for a few years now so not much gas is being used there.


Yes, except even Oz gas - which we have plenty of - is owned by profit-gouging private companies who prefer to export overseas....as we are now experiencing...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21516
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #37 - Jun 6th, 2022 at 4:58pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 6th, 2022 at 4:40pm:
"The emerging need for large-scale electricity storage makes vanadium redox flow batteries a major potential future use of vanadium," USGS wrote.


As long as the potential is realised. Wink
Vanadium price is about $US 832/LB.

Edit: "An example for the potential use of vanadium redox flow batteries is the Rongke Power Development in Dalian, China, which utilises an 800 MWh battery containing almost 7000 tonnes of vanadium pentoxide. "

https://www.engenium.com.au/knowledge/insight/161-vanadium-redox-flow-batteries....
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 6th, 2022 at 5:10pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15655
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #38 - Jun 7th, 2022 at 2:28pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 6th, 2022 at 4:58pm:
As long as the potential is realised. Wink
Vanadium price is about $US 832/LB.

Edit: "An example for the potential use of vanadium redox flow batteries is the Rongke Power Development in Dalian, China, which utilises an 800 MWh battery containing almost 7000 tonnes of vanadium pentoxide. "

https://www.engenium.com.au/knowledge/insight/161-vanadium-redox-flow-batteries....


7000 tons for one near-1 GWh battery...costing c.$14 billion? (couldn't see that figure in the article, only that "vanadium batteries are competitive with lithium batteries").

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21516
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #39 - Jun 7th, 2022 at 3:19pm
 
An updated price is between is between USD 10,000 and 25,000 per ton.

https://www.made-in-china.com/products-search/hot-china-products/Ferro_Vanadium_...

The price varies as purity varies.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15655
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #40 - Jun 8th, 2022 at 1:17pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 7th, 2022 at 3:19pm:
An updated price is between is between USD 10,000 and 25,000 per ton.

https://www.made-in-china.com/products-search/hot-china-products/Ferro_Vanadium_...

The price varies as purity varies.


Ah, $10, 000 per ton, not $1000 per lb....(= $2 million per ton, round figures.

So...$70 million for a 1 GWH battery. Not bad actually.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21516
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #41 - Jun 8th, 2022 at 3:33pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 8th, 2022 at 1:17pm:
Ah, $10, 000 per ton, not $1000 per lb....(= $2 million per ton, round figures.



And nowhere did I say $1,000 per lb. But I did miss a decimal point. I depends on quantity as well. By by the ton or the lb.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #42 - Jun 8th, 2022 at 5:49pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 6th, 2022 at 4:40pm:
Johnnie wrote on Jun 5th, 2022 at 5:54pm:
I think they stopped using the coal from Leigh Creek in 2016 and then blew up the generators.


Due to the erroneous neoliberal  privatization dogma which was established in the 80's (Thatcher/Reagan/ Hawke years), overthrowing the successful post war  Keynesnian 'welfare state' public ownership policy. (because economists misunderstood the stagflation in the 70's caused by M.E oil embargo, and competition from Asia resulting in loss of 1st world industrial manufacturing). 

"The Electricity Trust of South Australia (ETSA) was the South Australian Government-owned monopoly vertically integrated electricity provider from 1946 until its privatisation in 1999".

Quote:
I reckon the home batteries are BS, along with the big batteries. The home batteries are a big outlay, nobody knows how long they will last, you need a big roof top sola to make them viable and not much good if running a big A/C etc.


Depends on individual roof areas, available sun etc:

"Can I run my air conditioner on battery power?
The short answer is yes. With the proper equipment and enough batteries, you can run your RV AC unit on batteries. In addition to the lithium batteries, you'll need an inverter to invert the DC battery power into AC power for most air conditioning units.16 Aug 2021"


Quote:
You are never going to run industry on batteries, thousands would be needed to just to run a shopping centre and acres of solar panels.


Re large grid-scale vanadium batteries, powered by long-distance inter-connectors from solar and wind farms:

"Are vanadium flow batteries the future?
"The emerging need for large-scale electricity storage makes vanadium redox flow batteries a major potential future use of vanadium," USGS wrote. "Because of their large-scale storage capacity, development of VRBs could prompt increases in the use of wind, solar, and other renewable, intermittent power sources."15 May 2022


Quote:
Not sure what the big batteries are doing apart from providing a bit of stability which can be done by other means. All the big batteries we have wouldn't run a city for half a second, they would blow up before then anyway.


Addressed above, we don't have grid scale vanadium batteries at present. And add on a few Snowy 2's for storage; should just about get us through the night and  at times when the wind isn't blowing.

Quote:
Apart from going nuclear we should run on gas, we have plenty and build more wind farms. SA has been running on 63% renewables for a few years now so not much gas is being used there.


Yes, except even Oz gas - which we have plenty of - is owned by profit-gouging private companies who prefer to export overseas....as we are now experiencing...

The brown coal from Leigh Creek did a good job, a dirty job but a good job. Too bad we have so much good black coal around but its going to have to stay in the ground for the good of the planet. We should have gone nuclear 30 plus years ago.

Batteries can't even run a good size home reverse cycle A/C for more than a couple of hours. These vanadium batteries you speak of might be good but no battery is going to run industry, or even a small city without industry, or even a big town. Millions of batteries might do it.



Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 8th, 2022 at 5:57pm by Johnnie »  

big_battery.jpg (14 KB | 8 )
big_battery.jpg
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 121992
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #43 - Jun 8th, 2022 at 9:42pm
 

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
random
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2637
Gender: male
Re: More on wind turbines
Reply #44 - Jun 8th, 2022 at 9:56pm
 
World is now shutting down coal plants faster than it's opening them


Faced with the decision of whether to shut down coal plants or renewables, power companies have shut down coal plants.

"Coal absolutely loses the battle," Mr Buckley said.

"I think COVID is really creating a pause which allows a strategic rethink by power companies and governments."

Last month, Japan announced it was closing 100 of its 140 coal power plants by 2030.

Japan takes 45 per cent of Australia's thermal coal exports.

Mr Buckley said the closure of coal plants around the world would "categorically" affect demand for Australian coal, though it may be too late for this to stall the proposed Adani coal mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin.

"Adani's sunk cost may have gone past the point of no return," he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/world-global-coal-power-capacity-has-fell-in-2020/12523904
Back to top
 

So many farkwits, so little time.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print