thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 10
th, 2022 at 12:35am:
You are bleating about the "slavery" of the Chinese people, while at the same you are claiming the "right" to wage war, to 'defend' your irrational "freedom" ideology - irrational because "rights" don't exist in nature, they have to be invented by men, and the "right" you insist on ie to wage war - is the ultimate destroyer of life, because all nation's have their own point of view....never mind the ongoing slaughter of children in all wars.
And I don't know what that has to do with whether I claim to be Marxist or not.
Borders don’t exist in nature and are invented by men. Would the CCP allow Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Hong Kong to separate from China? Or would it claim the right to wage war on them as it does with Taiwan? Or arrogate to itself the right to commit atrocities on civilians as it does in Xinjiang?
Nations are human inventions, or does China not really exist?
The CCP arbitrarily slaughters and disappears those it calls its own citizens; as we’ve seen many times now through the hundreds of leaked videos from the CCP’s hellhole.
I can see through your doublespeak on ‘sovereign’ and ‘freedom’. You’re not really referring to individuals (a term you use less and less). You’re referring to ethnicities within China having no sovereign rights, or rights to freedom from the CCP, other than the CCP’s perversion of Han Chinese ethnic sovereign rights, in the name of whom it claims the freedom to take whatever it wants from whomever it wants.
Marx and Engels were both driven to propose communism as a direct result of witnessing the slavery of the British working class in the 19th century. You, on the other hand, prefer to think of the slavery of some as an artifact of the human condition.
Quote:Leninism/Stalinism was NOT envisioned by Marx
And yet Leninism / Stalinism / Maoism were the inevitable catastrophes of communism that the last 100+ years have proved.
Quote:But 'socialism' did after WW2, eg, in the NHS.
Democratic socialism is not totalitarian socialism.
Quote:Ok, I'll let that paragraph stand, for the sake of the argument. But the CCP is evolving rapidly into a one-party meritocracy, despite your desperate ideological narratives attempting to prove otherwise.
The CCP is currently rapidly devolving back to a Maoist totalitarian dictatorship, which was no different from the dynastic rule of China’s mad emperors.
Putin is trying to pull off the same devolution in Ukraine, which will soon see him removed from power.
Autocratic rule cannot allow meritocracy; there’s always the chance the meritocrat might disrupt the otherwise unchallengeable hierarchy. The CCP is more a kleptocratic / oligarchical, nepotistic autocracy, just a continuation of the old Chinese imperial dynasties with fewer silk robes and ponytails.
But then, you’re a prostitute to the CCP so, while servicing your masters, it’s probably best for you to just lie back and think of the party.