thegreatdivide wrote on Apr 3
rd, 2022 at 4:39pm:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 3
rd, 2022 at 3:07pm:
Law requires the power to enforce it. A law that cannot or will not be enforced isn't law, making war always a possibility as a last resort.
You are merely arguing against establishment of international law, necessary to prevent war as a means of dispute settlement between nations.
The current "rules of war" regime is a sop to your delusional freedom ideology.
Hence you acquiesce in the current murderous chaos, owing to your delusional "freedom" /"sovereign individual rights" ideology.
Quote:Ukrainian and Russian are almost identical and closer than dialects in China. Much closer than, say, Mandarin and Cantonese.
Nonsense, the losers of the the 1949 civil war were the same nationality and language groups as the winners of that war, whereas Ukrainians are at pains to highlight their cultural and linguistic difference with Russians (language being one of the points of dispute).
Quote:Should Southern Chinese Cantonese speakers separate from the rest of China?
No....nice try but no cigar, an international lawyer would soon put you straight.
So, according to you, foreign-speaking usurpers can claim land linguistically separate from them so long as the usurper is the CCP.
Has the CCP got its eye on Singapore because there are a lot of Han Chinese Mandarin / Cantonese speakers in Singapore?
The CCP is suppressing Mongolian and Tibetan in Inner Mongolia and Tibet respectively. Wonder why??!!
According to you, the CCP can invade Taiwan because the Taiwanese speak Mandarin or Cantonese.
Here's how it works. If an aggressive regime invades another country for whatever reason, the subjugated will always claim the right to defend themselves against and expel the invaders if they can. Nothing will change that.