Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 97 98 99 
Send Topic Print
Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) (Read 158573 times)
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1470 - Jun 28th, 2026 at 4:28pm
 
(Daily Mail)

Andy Burnham should reverse £1bn foreign aid cut as soon as he becomes PM, ex-No 10 adviser demands

(excerpt)

Tom Fletcher, 51, who served for three PMs and now heads the United Nations' humanitarian efforts, suggested foreign aid should be put before defence spending because it was more important.

Speaking today, the former British ambassador to Lebanon said that while the UN 'doesn't have any specific advice for Andy Burnham or for anyone else' his personal advice was 'having worked in No 10 for three different prime ministers, the key is normally not to rush the things that need to be taken slowly and not to go too slowly on the things that need to move fast - and then to reverse the aid cuts'.

Mr Fletcher, who has previously won high praise from both Gordon Brown and his successor across the political divide David Cameron, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme, that the foreign aid budget, which was slashed by Labour, should be reinstated to save millions of lives.


....

The problem: an ever-increasing proportion of national wealth is being hovered up by billionaires around the globe, courtesy of maintream Neoclassical ecoomics/Neoliberal free markets, while politicians are fooled by the mainstream 'balanced government budget' Neoclassical orthodoxy.

(google):

Between 8 and 12 billionaires hold the same amount of wealth as the poorest half of the world's population, which equals about 4 billion people.

The exact number changes over time based on the stock market and how these top individuals invest their money.

These findings come from annual wealth reports published by Oxfam.

Here is how the numbers have been calculated over recent years:

12 billionaires: The most recent figures show that the top 12 richest individuals own more combined wealth than the poorest 50% of the planet.

8 billionaires: In previous reports, the wealth of just 8 to 26 of the world's top billionaires was enough to equal the bottom half of the global population.

What is wealth?

In these reports, wealth means a person's total assets (like money in the bank, properties, and business ownership) minus any debt they owe.

How is it possible?

The bottom half of the world's population has very few assets and often lives in deep poverty. Meanwhile, the wealthiest individuals hold huge amounts of stock and real estate that can grow in value by billions of dollars in a single year.






Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 28th, 2026 at 4:33pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1471 - Jun 29th, 2026 at 11:02am
 
(Daily Mail)

Rachel Reeves says Andy Burnham will 'almost certainly' be next PM as she tries to defend her record
......

Typical career politician, she has no idea why her boss was sacked - inter alia, because she cancelled heating subsidies for pensioners last winter, to save 'taxpayer money'...  Thatcher's evil dogma still rules. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1472 - Jun 29th, 2026 at 1:58pm
 
Prof. Steve Keen:

What lies behind Starmer's resignation?

Kier Starmer’s resignation was driven by many factors, not least that he had all the charisma of a bus timetable. But the deep reason for his failure was that he continued the Neoliberal policies which have been followed by every UK leader since Maggie Thatcher.

The proponents of these policies believed that they would accelerate economic growth so much, in comparison to the preceding “Keynesian” policies, that UK citizens would no longer need welfare, public education, or public health. Why accept the State’s services, when you will be so much wealthier that you can save for your retirement easily, and pay for private education and private health cover.

Whoops: when you check the data, Neoliberalism did not deliver on its promise of higher growth. Dating Neoliberalism from the mid-1970s, the UK’s per capita economic growth between 1975 and 2019 (thus leaving out the effect of the pandemic) was 0.8% per year lower than growth between 1946 and 1975.

This was not a British abberation, but the norm: virtually every advanced economy grew more slowly under Neoliberalism than it did under the “bad old” Keynesian period (1946-1975).

It comes down to two major factors:

Neoliberalism deregulated the finance sector, and led to speculative lending rather than genuine investment; and

Cutting the government deficit actually terminated fiat money creation, which led to less money being available to enable investment out of cash flow.

Starmer was therefore another political victim of Neoliberalism. Sold to political parties as the basis for continued economic and therefore electoral success, it has impoverished the working and middle classes, and led to its political champions losing office.

Six have lost office so far in the UK, without completing their terms. Since the next UK Prime Minister in Waiting, Andy Burnham, is likely to continue these policies, there are likely to be seven Prime Ministerial victims of Neoliberalism before the next UK election.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1473 - Jul 2nd, 2026 at 2:38pm
 
(The Independent)

Voices: Sir Keir has left a fiscal mess for Andy Burnham to clean up.

.......

Yes - but The Independent's  journalists reject raising taxes to fix the 'fiscal mess', while urging Burnham "to invest in moving vulnerable people into work rather than merely saving the Treasury money; Mr Burnham and his colleagues could actually make a real difference to their lives".

So how does a government shift long-term unemployed people off the dole and into work - which requires government to create/identify the appropriate jobs - without first spending  "taxpayer" money? 

Proving the MSM, as always,  is ignorant of the nation's sovereign currency-issuing capacity. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1474 - Jul 3rd, 2026 at 1:24pm
 
(Daily Mail)

Andy Burnham rules out 'crude cuts' to welfare - as he hints that taxes will have to rise

Ofcourse taxes will have to rise, given he hasn't mentioned utilizing the nation's sovereign currency-issuing capacity to fund government.

The question is: which taxes?

Gabriel Zucman, author of "The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay", has some solutions.

At least Burnham  is aware the public is dissatisfied with the status quo:

"He admitted that his generation of politicians had ‘failed’ as he vowed to end the culture of political point scoring.

Asked how he would tackle welfare spending, he said: ‘I'm not going to go with the crude cuts to benefit levels that then just put people who are struggling in even worse poverty, and that often creates the backlash, and understandably so.’

Instead, he said he would focus on reforming the education system, offering work placements to young people and building council homes to reduce the number of ‘neets’ – young people not in education, employment or training.


Good, hopefully he has the courage to fight entrenched-wealth self-interest, on moral as well as economic grounds.





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1475 - Jul 3rd, 2026 at 3:39pm
 
And in Canada:

(The Daily Digest)

Why experts say Mark Carney faces political headwinds

(experts? "It's the economy, stupid" - or rather, the dysfunctional Neoclassical economy).

Carney has been working to expand Canadian export markets and re-engage with key global allies as Donald Trump fires off new and ever more unprecedented attacks on America’s closest friends and partners. Yet public opinion is still way down.

A whopping 35% of the 1,850 Canadians polled by Abacus Data between January 9th and 14 expressed their worries about Trump and his government. However, healthcare (37%), the economy (42%), and the rising cost of living (60%) all ranked far higher than Trump as the most important issues facing Canada.

"Other priorities include job security and unemployment, crime and public safety, climate change and the environment, and inequality and poverty. Concerns about global security threats, including China and Russia, remain lower on the list, as do issues related to Indigenous reconciliation and election interference," Abacus Data noted.

“These perceptions are consistent across most regions, but there are strong correlations between age and perceptions. Younger Canadians are more likely to think Canada is in a recession compared with older Canadians,” Abacus Data explained about its findings.

Carney faces a complicated future ahead. Coletto noted the Canadian electorate is paying attention to what’s happening at home and abroad more than ever, and their opinions will be shaped by global events and their perceptions about Canada’s growing economic fragility in the face of a quickly changing world.


..the fate of all mainstream politicians captured by Neoclassical economics.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1476 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 11:31am
 
(The Guardian)

Australia’s median wealth falls almost 7% since 2020 despite the rich getting richer, report says

Middle Australia’s wealth is going backwards while the richest claim an ever-greater share of the pile, according to new research that shows more than 25,000 people across the country became millionaires last year.

And the latest global wealth report from the Swiss bank UBS said 2025 marked “an extraordinary year”, in which close to a million new millionaires were created worldwide – a record increase in a single year.


etc.

Courtesy Neoclassical economics.

Perhaps the trend to the populist Right (or soclalist Left, as in local US elections recently) - caused by the fall in median wealth - will initiate the required revolution in public finances.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1477 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 6:45pm
 
Gary's economics:

https://www.msn.com/en-au/money/economy/why-asset-prices-rise-but-middle-class-w...

Why asset prices rise but middle class wages dont.

........

Informative video from a successful investor in financial assets, as opposed to investing in the economy's productive capacity to benefit everyone.

"Capitalism doesn't invest for poor people, which is why the wealth of working people is shrinking", as rich people increasingly hoover up society's wealth to invest in asset wealth, as opposed to productive capacity leading to consumption which can be afforded by all.   


His solution: increase taxes on the super wealthy.

The better solution:

https://publicmoneypublicgood.net/.

In any case change is urgently needed, because the current Neoclassical orthodoxy is leading to societal and economic collapse.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1478 - Jul 5th, 2026 at 11:02am
 
More on the 'asset economy', and increasing inequality since Thatcher-Reagan. 

by Gary Stevenson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSdhijZ7Uz4
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1479 - Jul 6th, 2026 at 2:09pm
 
[Core take-away: this article argues that recent progressive victories in New York signal a broader backlash against decades of rising oligarchy in the United States — and that this shift represents Donald Trump’s “worst nightmare” because it challenges the economic and political system that empowers him and his allies.]

(Alternet)

The earthquake is real as Trump's worst nightmare unfolds

On Tuesday night, the establishment wing of the Democratic Party got a message it would prefer to pretend it didn’t hear. In New York, Mamdani-backed progressives swept the congressional primaries, ousting two sitting Democratic congressmen and taking an open seat in a single evening.

Former city comptroller Brad Lander beat Rep. Dan Goldman by more than thirty points.

A 32-year-old democratic socialist named Darializa Avila Chevalier knocked off five-term Rep. Adriano Espaillat, the chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and state Assembly member Claire Valdez won the seat Nydia Velázquez is vacating.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (a recipient of dark money and AIPAC money) campaigned hard against all three and watched all three win anyway.

As Bernie Sanders put it afterward, the message is pretty clear: Americans are sick to death of a rigged economy and of billionaires buying their elections.

The corporate press and just about every Republican in the country will tell you these candidates are “socialists,” and they’ll spit the word the way you’d say “arsonist.” A little history clears the fog.

When a young public defender in upper Manhattan or a state assemblywoman in Brooklyn calls herself a democratic socialist today, she isn’t talking about Havana or the old Soviet Politburo (the way Republicans and much of the press want you to think). The three who won in New York ran on Medicare for All, affordable housing, stronger union protections, and an end to U.S. military support for Israel’s assault on Gaza.


............


Hmm.... people are seeing Trump's "communist threat" ideation for what is, namely, utter garbage.

Interestingly, as interest in revolutionary Marxism was growing in Europe in the late 19th century, a German thinker, Eduard Bernstein, founder of the 'Democratic Sociallist' movement,  rejected Marx's (violent) revolution idea in  favour of achieving socialism through democratic means. 

Bernstein noted that Marx's prophesy of capitalism's  collapse didn't occur in late Victorian England, where a growing middle class was experiencing gains in living standards.

But fast forward to today, and we see the middle class is going backwards, which is why Bernstein's concept of socialism through democracy is becoming more and more relevant, after more than a century of extreme political and economic upheaval around the globe, manifested in 2 world wars separated by the GD; post war globalization; the collapse of the USSR,  and the rise of China as a competitor to the US, with median wages in the democracies stagnating while the economy churns out billionaires. 

Bernstein's era of 'democratic socialism' has arrived, as a reaction to decades of capitalism being co-opted by Neoclassical excess (see the 1946/7 Taft Hartley Act, leading to the final collapse of union power under Thatcher-Reagan anti-union ideology). 





Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 6th, 2026 at 2:21pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1480 - Jul 7th, 2026 at 11:51am
 
(Daily Mail)

Who will foot the bill for Burnham? New PM's business rates vow alone 'will cost £880m'

[......ah, the old 'how ya gunna pay for it' refrain of Conservatives - even though in this case the proposal is for lower taxes on small businesses, to support 'High Street' activity.]


Final paragraphs:

Senior Tory MP Andrew Griffith,  the shadow business secretary, said: 'Any reduction in business rates that supports small businesses is welcome.

'But funding those cuts by increasing taxes on larger businesses simply shifts the burden elsewhere.

'At a time when Britain is losing companies and wealth creators this does nothing to encourage them to stay or invest.

'Whether it is Andy Burnham or Keir Starmer, Labour does not understand you cannot tax your way to growth.


So......if  government shouldn't increase taxes on large companies and "wealth creators" (according to Griffitth),  how CAN it raise revenue?

Hopeless.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15440
Gender: male
Re: Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)
Reply #1481 - Yesterday at 1:51pm
 
Gary Stevenson wants to avoid reversion to pre-WW2 inequality, leading to Dickensian  poverty all over again.

He's hoping to talk to Burnham who is considering increases to CGT.

(on BBC Channel 4)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPeP9xFrtP0

Gary Stevenson says Britain is FINISHED unless we fix this problem

"If we don't get wealth taxes or some serious movement on wealth taxes when Burnham comes in, he will lose the next election".

.....

Gary admits his 2% tax on extreme wealth alone - like Burnham's mooted changes to CGT -  won't fix the problem, but it will be a start.

He says Britain has 2 choices: Burnham and tax reform, or Farage's Reform,  ie, stop immigration.

Gary needs to connect with Steve Keen who is explaining why politicians are misled by Neoclassical economists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l5kROMYEcw

Together they would have a complete understanding of the way forward, to gain the public's support to vote for democratic socialist politicians, to achieve an economy which works for all.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 97 98 99 
Send Topic Print