Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 17
Send Topic Print
17 feet of snow in California (Read 13725 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 60459
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #15 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:25pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Dec 29th, 2021 at 8:00pm:
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/28/us/california-december-snow-record-drought-cl...

The nearly 17 feet of snow in California's
Sierra Nevada is crushing records.



By Rachel Ramirez, CNN

Updated 0712 GMT (1512 HKT) December 29, 2021


https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/211228082941-02-winter-weather-california...



(CNN)After months of extreme drought that triggered water shortages and stoked wildfires, heavy snow is falling in the Sierra Nevada -- enough to break decades-old records.
As of Tuesday, more than 202 inches of snow -- nearly 17 feet (5.2 meters) -- had fallen so far this month at the University of California, Berkeley's Central Sierra Snow Laboratory, at Donner Pass east of Sacramento.
Scientists at the lab said this month is now the snowiest December on record for the location and the third snowiest month overall. The top month was January 2017 when 238 inches (6 meters) fell, and it's not likely enough snow will fall in the next three days to challenge that record. Records here go back to 1970.
Lab officials said the snow was "deep and hard to get through," and it took them roughly 40 minutes to get to where the measurements are taken just 150 feet away from the lab's front door.



Parts of Japan are also experiencing catastrophic global warming  Cry Cry Cry

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/12/27/national/record-snowfall-west-japan...
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15650
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #16 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:37pm
 
lee wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:23pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:16pm:
Probably less than me; however she believes in the IPCC consensus, and has started a global movement followed by billions of people.


And you have shown you know nothing. You quoted Edward Teller. I responded and then you lamely said you believed the IPCC. The same IPCC that says the Summary for Policy Makers is supreme to the science. Roll Eyes


Did you miss the point? Greta believes in the IPCC consensus which is driving the COP meetings. What I believe is not the issue.

Quote:
So now the "science" is refutable.


See above. The COP meetings are unstoppable. You lost the debate, regardless of the "(ir)-refutable"  science.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15650
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #17 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:44pm
 
Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:25pm:
Parts of Japan are also experiencing catastrophic global warming  Cry Cry Cry

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/12/27/national/record-snowfall-west-japan...


https://www.weather.com/science/environment/news/2021-02-14-does-cold-weather-di...

It's possible that cold polar air is being circulated in unusual patterns, consistent with global warming; hence these local freezes. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21507
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #18 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:44pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:37pm:
Greta believes in the IPCC consensus which is driving the COP meetings.


She also believes she can see CO2, according to her mother. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:37pm:
The COP meetings are unstoppable.


Yay More snouts in the trough. More gatherings in exotic locations. More private jet flights to those exotic locations. "But this is serious I tell you". Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:37pm:
You lost the debate, regardless of the "(ir)-refutable"  science.


Nope. Young public opinion is not debate. Roll Eyes

So all this time the alarmists have been saying the "science is settled" and it's not. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Remember 42.5% of German youth would do something (unquantified).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21507
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #19 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:48pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:44pm:
It's possible that cold polar air is being circulated in unusual patterns, consistent with global warming; hence these local freezes. 


You mean those "unusual" conditions that have occurred before AGW were also AGW? Grin Grin Grin

They have been known since the 1800's. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15650
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #20 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:59pm
 
lee wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:44pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:37pm:
Greta believes in the IPCC consensus which is driving the COP meetings.


She also believes she can see CO2, according to her mother. Roll Eyes


oh dear, Lee descending into diversions and irrelevance (again) when he loses a debate.

Quote:
Yay More snouts in the trough. More gatherings in exotic locations. More private jet flights to those exotic locations. "But this is serious I tell you"


Undoubtedly "nice work if you can get it..."


Quote:
Nope. Young public opinion is not debate. Roll Eyes


The IPCC consensus is not "young public opinion ". You lose.

Quote:
So all this time the alarmists have been saying the "science is settled"


The IPCC have alarmed most of the world's citizens, and hence leaders who want to get re-elected; you lose.

Meanwhile Xi Jinping knows he has to clean up the poisonous fossil-caused smog ruining life in Chinese cities, so even he is on board. Ditto Modi in India.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15650
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #21 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:03pm
 
lee wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:48pm:
You mean those "unusual" conditions that have occurred before AGW were also AGW? Grin Grin Grin


No , the unusual conditions that are breaking record cold temps in given localities, since industrialization began 

Quote:
They have been known since the 1800's. Wink

Yes.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21507
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #22 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:10pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:03pm:
No , the unusual conditions that are breaking record cold temps in given localities, since industrialization began 


So the LIA was in the midst of industrialisation? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21507
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #23 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:18pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:59pm:
oh dear, Lee descending into diversions and irrelevance (again) when he loses a debate.



Poor petal. You were the one that brought up what she believes. Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:59pm:
The IPCC consensus is not "young public opinion ". You lose.


The IPCC is not debate. It is a closed club. Consensus is not debate; it is the antithesis of debate. You lose.

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:59pm:
The IPCC have alarmed most of the world's citizens, and hence leaders who want to get re-elected; you lose.


They have. Now all you have to do is show they are right. But you can't; you lose.

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:59pm:
Meanwhile Xi Jinping knows he has to clean up the poisonous fossil-caused smog ruining life in Chinese cities, so even he is on board. Ditto Modi in India.


They are building nuclear not solar or wind. You lose.

Meanwhile in Australia numpties want offshore wind turbines. And that in whale migration paths. I wonder what the infrasound will do to their location soundings. Sometimes greenies aren't green.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:29pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 121982
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #24 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:40pm
 
Greta never mentions this:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1519823686/0#0

Thorium power could be a game changer.
Cheap, safe, unlimited power.
It would solve all our problems.
We wouldn't need to burn any fossil fuels.

That is the only way out that I can see.
It seems that only the Chinese and Indians are
making the massive investment required to do it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15650
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #25 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:44pm
 
lee wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:18pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 1:59pm:
oh dear, Lee descending into diversions and irrelevance (again) when he loses a debate.

Poor petal. You were the one that brought up what she believes.
You are the one saying what she believes is nonsense.

Quote:
The IPCC is not debate. It is a closed club. Consensus is not debate; it is the antithesis of debate. You lose.


The IPCC consensus is based on science, though refutable apparently. But the IPCC consensus has won the day. You lose.

Quote:
They have. Now all you have to do is show they are right. But you can't; you lose.


I don't have to do anything, the IPCC consensus has won the day around the entire world, further global course of action to be decided at the next COP, you lose.

Quote:
They are building nuclear not solar or wind. You lose.


They are building all three at a faster rate than any other country in the world.

Quote:
Meanwhile in Australia numpties want offshore wind turbines. And that in whale migration paths. I wonder what the infrasound will do to their location soundings. Sometimes greenies aren't green.


Nice to see your concern for whales. Technology can deal with those problems (eg, are whales blind? sonar devices? etc)
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:50pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15650
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #26 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 3:03pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:40pm:
Greta never mentions this:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1519823686/0#0

Thorium power could be a game changer.
Cheap, safe, unlimited power.
It would solve all our problems.
We wouldn't need to burn any fossil fuels.

That is the only way out that I can see.
It seems that only the Chinese and Indians are
making the massive investment required to do it.


China and India have nearly 3 billion people between them, suffering under vast fossil smogs; so the investment is worthwhile.

Likely not economic in Oz (and does Oz have its own Thorium)?
As for Greta, she likely is concerned about the unsolved waste problem with current nuclear plants; and even Germany is closing its nuclear power plants (and Japan is ambivalent after the Fukushima tsunami disaster).   
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 30th, 2021 at 3:13pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21507
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #27 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 3:07pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:44pm:
You are the one saying what she believes is nonsense.


So you agree with her that she can see CO2? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:44pm:
The IPCC consensus is based on science, though refutable apparently. But the IPCC consensus has won the day


But you were pontificating about the debate being won. Now you are saying it doesn't matter about debate. Consensus is more important. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:44pm:
I don't have to do anything, the IPCC consensus has won the day around the entire world, further global course of action to be decided at the next COP



Poor petal. They haven't done much in 26; how many will it take? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:44pm:
They are building all three at a faster rate than any other country in the world.


Wind and solar will only ever be at the periphery. You don't understand energy density at all. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 121982
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #28 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 3:09pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 3:03pm:
Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 2:40pm:
Greta never mentions this:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1519823686/0#0

Thorium power could be a game changer.
Cheap, safe, unlimited power.
It would solve all our problems.
We wouldn't need to burn any fossil fuels.

That is the only way out that I can see.
It seems that only the Chinese and Indians are
making the massive investment required to do it.


China and India have nearly 3 billion people between them, suffering under vast fossil smogs; so the investment is worthwhile.

Likely not economic in Oz (and does Oz have its own Thorium)? 



We have some of the largest Thorium reserves in the world.
It's mostly unused tailings from existing mines.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15650
Gender: male
Re: 17 feet of snow in California
Reply #29 - Dec 30th, 2021 at 3:26pm
 
lee wrote on Dec 30th, 2021 at 3:07pm:
So you agree with her that she can see CO2? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


Dunno, don't care. 

Quote:
But you were pontificating about the debate being won. Now you are saying it doesn't matter about debate. Consensus is more important. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


That's right, apparently too subtle for you; IPCC consensus, meaning the AGW debate  - about which I'm agnostic - is won.   

Quote:
Poor petal. They haven't done much in 26; how many will it take? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


Dunno, they will turn up, but.....depends on how ugly the climate becomes,  I suppose.....and the rate of fall in cost of renewables. 

Quote:
Wind and solar will only ever be at the periphery. You don't understand energy density at all. Roll Eyes


I understand Oz could power itself many times over with solar/wind + pumpedhydro storage + smart grid, including interconnection to Tasmania as the nation's battery.

https://www.hydro.com.au/clean-energy/battery-of-the-nation
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 17
Send Topic Print