Reconstruction of Environmental Conditions in the Eastern Part of Primorsky Krai (Russian Far East) in the Late Holocene



https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1995425521030094

Modern and sub-fossil corals suggest reduced temperature variability in the eastern pole of the Indian Ocean Dipole during the medieval climate anomaly



https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-94465-1

Sea surface temperature seasonality in the northern South China Sea during the middle Holocene derived from high resolution Sr/Ca ratios of Tridacna shells



https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/quaternary-research/article/abs/sea-surf...

6,000-Year Reconstruction of Modified Circumpolar Deep Water Intrusion and Its Effects on Sea Ice and Penguin in the Ross Sea



https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2021GL094545

Oh dear. There goes the hockey stick ... Again.

That's  why they renamed it climate change.  They want everything to change and call it progress. Except climate. Climate must not change. That is also progress.

There is no further room for debate?


https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/05/health/nobel-prize-physics-winner-scn-2021/in...





By Rob Picheta and Katie Hunt, CNN

Updated 1308 GMT (2108 HKT) October 5, 2021


(CNN)The Nobel Prize in physics has been awarded to scientists Syukuro Manabe, Klaus Hasselmann and Giorgio Parisi, whose groundbreaking work over the past 60 years predicted climate change and decoded complex physical systems.
Manabe, 90, and Hasselmann, 89, were jointly honored for "the physical modelling of Earth's climate, quantifying variability and reliably predicting global warming," according to the news release from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
Both men carried out pioneering work in the 1960s and 1970s that sounded an early alarm on human-made climate change.

Italian physicist Parisi, 73, claimed the other half of the award, for "the discovery of the interplay of disorder and fluctuations in physical systems from atomic to planetary scales."

The trio were announced as winners at a news conference Tuesday in Stockholm, Sweden.

Frank wrote on Oct 16^th, 2021 at 1:41pm:


I would think that we don't want climate change that we cause leading to millions of people dying is probably what you should be thinking about.

Dnarever wrote on Oct 16^th, 2021 at 8:39pm:


That is CO2 theory petal.

"How Exactly Does Carbon Dioxide Cause Global Warming?"

https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/02/25/carbon-dioxide-cause-global-warming...

or skepsci

     

"How do we know more CO2 is causing warming?"

https://skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effe...

Nothing at skepsci about CO2 causing cooling.

Dnarever wrote on Oct 16^th, 2021 at 8:39pm:


The IPCC says so.   

"Mean temperatures and heat extremes have emerged above natural variability in almost all land regions with high confidence."

"Several impact-relevant changes have not yet emerged from the natural variability but will emerge sooner or later in this century depending on the emissions scenario (high
confidence). "

"It is likely that the proportion of intense tropical cyclones has increased over the last four decades and that this cannot be explained entirely by natural variability."

https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_TS.pdf

"In conclusion, there is simply no supporting evidence or physics behind the claim that the global warming over the past century could simply be attributed to internal variability."

https://skepticalscience.com/internal-variability.htm

But apparently it can explain cooling.


Figure 1: Estimation of the observed signature of internal variability in the observed 20th century global mean temperature in climate model simulations

Oh, because... climate models.

And just look at the 1930-1940s peak which has since disappeared.