If you say the VAXX may be ineffective or dangerous, we will ban you.
A prohibition against open 'examination'.
Not allowed to make an argument.
Not allowed to have a debate.
Too many 'special interests' to protect ?.
Quote:YouTube to Block All Anti-Vax Content and Ban Prominent Skeptics Like Robert Kennedy Jr.
Lindsey Ellefson
Thu, September 30, 2021
YouTube is taking steps to remove content from prominent COVID-19 vaccine skeptics, including
Joseph Mercola and
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.As part of a set of new policies first reported by the Washington Post, YouTube
will ban any videos claiming that commonly used vaccines approved by health officials are ineffective or dangerous.
YouTube has enacted similar measures against accounts
sharing misinformation about COVID-19.
......
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/youtube-ban-prominent-vaccine-skeptics-14595...WWW search....
YouTube Cracks Down On Anti-Vaccine Misinformation, Ejects Robert Kennedy Jr. And Others From Platform
YouTube bans all anti-vaccine content, not just COVID-19 relatedYouTube and other WWW platforms, are simply closing accounts, if they [YouTube themselves, alone] deem that information being presented for '
examination',
is 'misinformation' or is in 'error'.
Q.Why not have the open debate ?
Truth is concealed, in silence.
Lies and misinformation are
protected, in silence [censorship].
.
John 3:19
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
.
Vaccine efficacy and safety.
Why not have the open debate ?Yadda said.....
Quote:
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS SELF REGULATING
Open societies do not fear the opinions of fools.
....they rather, EXPOSE and laugh at folly!
In any free and open society, where debate is free and open, if a 'position' is absurd, if an 'argument' is absurd,
...then the debater is [often] condemned to all, WITH HIS OWN WORDS.
And that result [i.e. the exposure of folly] is THE VERY FUNCTION, of free and open debate.
Free and open debate is meant to be A CONTEST OF IDEAS!
....where every folly is revealed.
And open debate is healthy, to all general freedoms in a society.
Whereas, lies are easily concealed in closed societies,
....*because* these closed societies are places where lies, and falsehood,
....ARE NEVER EXPOSED TO SCRUTINY, OR SPOKEN TRUTH.
MY OPINION;We have laws to protect us [peaceable persons]. [....that is their
legitimate purpose, in a democratic system of governance.]
If laws begin to oppress us, those laws,
and the drafters of those oppressive laws become illegitimate.
Because no sane man, would choose to oppress or to harm,
himself.