Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation (Read 1017 times)
whiteknight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9416
melbourne
Gender: male
Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Jan 23rd, 2021 at 6:21pm
 
Australia cannot shirk ‘moral obligation’ to tackle climate change: Brian Schmidt

January 23, 2021
Sydney Morning Herald

Australian Nobel laureate scientist Brian Schmidt has told a summit of global leaders that Australia is duty bound to take a lead on climate action and called for an international effort to combat an anti-science agenda and climate change denial.   Smiley

“For Australia, which is such a large per capita contributor to global emissions and which has
such abundance of natural renewable resources, the answer lies in scaling up clean energy
generation ASAP,” Professor Schmidt, vice-chancellor of the Australian National University, said in a speech on Friday night.



“This is an urgent moral obligation which Australia must not shirk.”

Professor Schmidt, who won the Nobel prize for physics in 2011, made his comments to the Climate Adaptation Summit, hosted by the Netherlands but being conducted online.



Federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley is representing Australia at the summit, which is also being attended by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Chinese Vice-Premier Han Zheng, French President Emmanuel Macron and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

RELATED ARTICLE 
President-elect Joe Biden speaks from Wilmington, Delaware.
Climate policy
Biden's climate goals turn up heat on Morrison   Smiley
Professor Schmidt said the coronavirus pandemic had reinforced the importance of science in policy making, and he was hopeful this trend would help drive greater efforts to curb climate change.

“The purveyors of doubt have tried to devalue these powerful weapons in the fight against climate change. We can’t let them succeed,” he said. “Things, though, are starting to swing back. Medical science has brilliantly come to the rescue in the gravest crisis the people of the world have faced for generations.”

Australia trails China, Japan, Britain, South Korea and now the US, which have net zero emissions targets for 2050 or 2060.

The Climate Adaptation Summit is an international collaboration to build momentum ahead of the UN’s major climate summit in November. It aims to form an international agenda for adaptation and resilience in tackling the effects of climate change, such as increasing extreme weather.


Last December Mr Johnson convened another summit as a prelude to November’s major event. Australia was not invited to speak after a diplomatic push among attending countries resolved to reserve places for countries making “ambitious” new commitments including pledges from developed countries to reach net zero emissions by 2050.

Mr Morrison planned to use his speech to announce Australia had abandoned its internationally controversial plan to use credits earned under the Kyoto treaty to achieve its emissions reduction targets under the Paris Agreement.

The Morrison government has said it can meet its Paris commitment by reaching net zero emissions some time in the second half of this century, but it has not set a more ambitious deadline.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 21520
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #1 - Jan 23rd, 2021 at 6:35pm
 
OOOH an astronomer. Shirley he should be an astrologer?

Australia is a carbon sink. We want climate reparations now. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ayn Marx
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2937
South of Australia
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #2 - Jan 24th, 2021 at 1:22pm
 
lee wrote on Jan 23rd, 2021 at 6:35pm:
OOOH an astronomer. Shirley he should be an astrologer?

Australia is a carbon sink. We want climate reparations now. Wink

Not funny, not true and just downright stupid.
Back to top
 

The Human Race is Insane
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 21520
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #3 - Jan 24th, 2021 at 2:01pm
 
Ayn Marx wrote on Jan 24th, 2021 at 1:22pm:
Not funny, not true and just downright stupid.



Not true?

"Australia has 149 million hectares of forest. Of this, 147 million hectares is native forest, dominated by eucalypt (79%) and acacia (7%), and 1.82 million hectares is in plantations[i]. Grassland covers around 440 million hectares of land in Australia[ii]."

"The amount of carbon taken up every year by dry forests in Australia depends on the weather conditions and age of the trees. Science tells us that the range for forests with continuous canopies is about 0.5-2 tonnes of carbon per year for each hectare. Grasslands may have a similar annual rate of net carbon uptake[i], but the long-term storage of carbon per hectare of grasslands is less than that over an average hectare in woody trees."

https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/2009/12/which-plants-store-more-carbon-in-aust...

To convert C to CO2 multiply by 3.667

Now Australia's emissions are about 530 Mt CO2e

So at the minimum 0.5t/Ha of CO2 that would be 1.8335t of CO2/ha.
We add the 149 and the 440 we get 589 million Ha. We multiply that by 1.8335 we get about 1,079Mt CO2. That is larger than 530 Mt.

Or alternatively you could read the paper of Barrett DJ (2002) published by the CSIRO.

https://www.publish.csiro.au/BT/BT04106

He estimates 700Mt CO2 sequestration - which is still more than 530 Mt CO2.

Perhaps you might learn something instead of shooting from the lip.

Edit: This has been posted many times. But people ignore it. I sometimes think some people need to be treated like computers.... and punch the information in. Wink
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2021 at 2:09pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16737
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #4 - Jan 24th, 2021 at 2:42pm
 
Yes, Australia is a high per capita CO2 emitter.

However, Australia contributes only about 1% of Global emissions.

The real arseholes Globally are:

CHINA
USA
INDIA


They should be doing much much more to reduce emissions.  Angry
Back to top
 

Fire the LIAR in 2028!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 21520
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #5 - Jan 24th, 2021 at 2:49pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 24th, 2021 at 2:42pm:
Yes, Australia is a high per capita CO2 emitter.



And the reason that Australia is a high per capita emitter? Large distances, large land mass and small population.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ayn Marx
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2937
South of Australia
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #6 - Jan 24th, 2021 at 4:46pm
 
lee wrote on Jan 24th, 2021 at 2:01pm:
Ayn Marx wrote on Jan 24th, 2021 at 1:22pm:
Not funny, not true and just downright stupid.



Not true?

"Australia has 149 million hectares of forest. Of this, 147 million hectares is native forest, dominated by eucalypt (79%) and acacia (7%), and 1.82 million hectares is in plantations[i]. Grassland covers around 440 million hectares of land in Australia[ii]."

"The amount of carbon taken up every year by dry forests in Australia depends on the weather conditions and age of the trees. Science tells us that the range for forests with continuous canopies is about 0.5-2 tonnes of carbon per year for each hectare. Grasslands may have a similar annual rate of net carbon uptake[i], but the long-term storage of carbon per hectare of grasslands is less than that over an average hectare in woody trees."

https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/2009/12/which-plants-store-more-carbon-in-aust...

To convert C to CO2 multiply by 3.667

Now Australia's emissions are about 530 Mt CO2e

So at the minimum 0.5t/Ha of CO2 that would be 1.8335t of CO2/ha.
We add the 149 and the 440 we get 589 million Ha. We multiply that by 1.8335 we get about 1,079Mt CO2. That is larger than 530 Mt.

Or alternatively you could read the paper of Barrett DJ (2002) published by the CSIRO.

https://www.publish.csiro.au/BT/BT04106

He estimates 700Mt CO2 sequestration - which is still more than 530 Mt CO2.

Perhaps you might learn something instead of shooting from the lip.

Edit: This has been posted many times. But people ignore it. I sometimes think some people need to be treated like computers.... and punch the information in. Wink

So, nothing’s changed since 2008? Very comforting to know land clearance and bushfires haven’t taken place since then.
Back to top
 

The Human Race is Insane
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 21520
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #7 - Jan 24th, 2021 at 5:06pm
 
Ayn Marx wrote on Jan 24th, 2021 at 4:46pm:
So, nothing’s changed since 2008? Very comforting to know land clearance and bushfires haven’t taken place since then.



Ok let's look at that.

latest estimates are about 134 million ha of forests. That would reduce CO2 sequestration by  about 27Mt. Still sequestration larger than emissions.

Bushfires? wood burning is deemed to be carbon neutral by the Climate ScientisTM. That's why they converted DRAX power to woodchips from coal.

But new growth sequesters more than old growth. And with all that forest burned there is more new growth.

But estimates of forests burnt is 18.6 M Ha for 2019-20. That would reduce forests to about 115M Ha.  So if there was no regrowth that would reduce the sequestration by about another 35Mt of CO2. Still over 1000Mt sequestered.


Anything else?

Edit: Even deserts are a carbon sink.

"Greater ecosystem carbon in the Mojave Desert after ten years exposure to elevated CO2"

https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2184
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2021 at 5:21pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #8 - Jan 26th, 2021 at 9:22am
 
lee wrote on Jan 24th, 2021 at 2:49pm:
Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 24th, 2021 at 2:42pm:
Yes, Australia is a high per capita CO2 emitter.



And the reason that Australia is a high per capita emitter? Large distances, large land mass and small population.


100%............... Cool
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Laugh till you cry
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #9 - Jan 26th, 2021 at 9:35am
 
Morals have never been a consideration to Australian politicians of both sides.

Personal gain first, and votes second, are the principal drivers of Australian politician's behavior.
Back to top
 

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #10 - Jan 26th, 2021 at 11:29am
 
Captain Nemo wrote on Jan 24th, 2021 at 2:42pm:
Yes, Australia is a high per capita CO2 emitter.

However, Australia contributes only about 1% of Global emissions.

The real arseholes Globally are:

CHINA
USA
INDIA


They should be doing much much more to reduce emissions.  Angry


...
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Laugh till you cry
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #11 - Jan 26th, 2021 at 11:57am
 
The fact Australia has a low population is not a license to do nothing about AGW.

The Australian community is way ahead of the Australian government in it's response.
Back to top
 

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #12 - Jan 26th, 2021 at 12:02pm
 
Laugh till you cry wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 11:57am:
The fact Australia has a low population is not a license to do nothing about AGW.

The Australian community is way ahead of the Australian government in it's response.


What do you suggest we do........???

Go and live in caves..................!!!

No matter what we do it will only be 1% because that's all we emit 1% of manmade emissions.

Will that even make a difference......!!!
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Laugh till you cry
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #13 - Jan 26th, 2021 at 12:40pm
 
Australians can't afford caves. Their price is rising.

Lean-tos is about the best that can be achieved with Australian closet pom technology.

The good thing is that such a movement could revive the fortunes of the stump-jump plow and convert it from artifact to valued implement. There are so many stumps from deforestation.
Back to top
 

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Australia Cannot Shirk Moral Obligation
Reply #14 - Jan 26th, 2021 at 12:53pm
 
Laugh till you cry wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 12:40pm:
Australians can't afford caves. Their price is rising.

Lean-tos is about the best that can be achieved with Australian closet pom technology.

The good thing is that such a movement could revive the fortunes of the stump-jump plow and convert it from artifact to valued implement. There are so many stumps from deforestation.


If the IPCC were real about mitigating manmade emissions the first thing they should have done is to BAN de-forestation all over the globe.

Instead of trying to creating a trillion dollar carbon derivatives market on the stock exchange.


Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print