Australian Politics Forum - Impeach Terrorist Leader

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19257 Gender:	Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader Reply #165 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:20pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:18pm: White flag accepted. Poor petal. Accepting a white flag? Should I accept your white flag for showing that you have no clue? Perhaps you can show where "most secure in history" precludes voter rigging?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 145703 Gender:	Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader Reply #166 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:23pm
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19257 Gender:	Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader Reply #167 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:26pm Poor widdle gweggy - reduced to posting pretty pictures. He just doesn't have the words.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 145703 Gender:	Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader Reply #168 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:27pm
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19257 Gender:	Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader Reply #169 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:28pm Such a d!ck.
Back to top	IP Logged

ProudKangaroo Gold Member Offline The Sandstorm is coming 🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵 Posts: 20843 Meeanjin (Brisbane)	Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader Reply #170 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:35pm lee wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:06pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:02pm: It's been resolved, more there sixty times. Nope. "Most secure in history" does not say what you think it means. It also doesn't say what you're implying either. "Most secure in history" ≠ ermahgerd election fraud.
Back to top	IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19257
Gender: male

Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader
Reply #171 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:38pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:35pm:

It also doesn't say what you're implying either.

Poor petal. It merely means exactly what it says. That it was the most secure in history. But it doesn't imply it was secure.

lee wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:16pm:

"Most secure" is it 87%. 97% 99.999%. It is a meaningless statement if there are no metrics.

You don't reada sogood?

Back to top

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 20843
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader
Reply #172 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm

lee wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:08pm:

Present your evidence.

It is a statement of fact. No evidence required. "Most secure" is it 87%. 97% 99.999%. It is a meaningless statement if there are no metrics.

If you want to get pedantic, "Most secure" implies that out of every previous election, this was the most secure.

Therefore if there has been no mass election fraud in previous elections which there has been zero evidence of either, then 2020 was more secure than those meaning there was also no mass election fraud in this case either.

But honestly, when you're asked to show evidence of election fraud and the best you can come up with is "most secure" could mean only 87% secure, this is not evidence.

You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

Keep on trolling dick head.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader
Reply #173 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:41pm

lee wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:02pm:

It's been resolved, more there sixty times.

Nope. "Most secure in history" does not say what you think it means. Wink

It also doesn't - by extension - give you what you hope it does.

I note that you still have not answered my questions from an earlier thread.

If you have an issue with the 2020 election - by definition the "most secure in history", then you must have an issue with earlier - again by definition "less secure" elections...including the one in which Trump was elected.

If you do not have an issue with those earlier elections, why is that?

Is it because a "less secure" election delivered a result you're happy with, and a "more secure" election did not?*

*I ask this, noting that despite your assertion that "most secure does not equate to 100% secure", there has to date been no evidence of fraud uncovered that would have in any way altered the result of the 2020 election

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19257
Gender: male

Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader
Reply #174 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:45pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

If you want to get pedantic, "Most secure" implies that out of every previous election, this was the most secure.

Yes petal. That's what I wrote. I am so glad you agree. Wink

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

Therefore if there has been no mass election fraud in previous elections which there has been evidence of either, then 2020 was more secure than those meaning there was also no mass election fraud in this case either.

Wow. Repetition with feeling. Grin

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

But honestly, when you're asked to show evidence of election fraud and the best you can come up with is "most secure" could mean only 87% secure, this is not evidence.

I have never said there was widespread election fraud. But perhaps you can find some reference if it has slipped my mind? Nah Can't do that it is FD's funky non-functional search function. Grin

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

And nowhere have I said there was evidence. Roll Eyes

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

Keep on trolling dick head.

poor petal. Can't even enunciate his butt hurt feelings. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader
Reply #175 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:46pm

lee wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:20pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:18pm:

White flag accepted.

Poor petal. Accepting a white flag? Grin

Should I accept your white flag for showing that you have no clue? Grin

Perhaps you can show where "most secure in history" precludes voter rigging?

Ah, here we go.

Without being able to provide a shred of evidence to prove the election was rigged, you're now looking to others to "provide proof that it wasn't"?

I imagine that you also agree with the principle of reversing the onus of proof in legal proceedings, too?

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19257 Gender:	Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader Reply #176 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:50pm Mix_Master wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:46pm: Without being able to provide a shred of evidence to prove the election was rigged, you're now looking to others to "provide proof that it wasn't"? Poor petal. is English you second third fourth language? Please show where I have said the election was "rigged".
Back to top	IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 20843
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader
Reply #177 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:53pm

lee wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:45pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

If you want to get pedantic, "Most secure" implies that out of every previous election, this was the most secure.

Yes petal. That's what I wrote. I am so glad you agree. Wink

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

Therefore if there has been no mass election fraud in previous elections which there has been evidence of either, then 2020 was more secure than those meaning there was also no mass election fraud in this case either.

Wow. Repetition with feeling. Grin

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

But honestly, when you're asked to show evidence of election fraud and the best you can come up with is "most secure" could mean only 87% secure, this is not evidence.

I have never said there was widespread election fraud. But perhaps you can find some reference if it has slipped my mind? Nah Can't do that it is FD's funky non-functional search function. Grin

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

And nowhere have I said there was evidence. Roll Eyes

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:39pm:

Keep on trolling dick head.

poor petal. Can't even enunciate his butt hurt feelings. Grin

Funny, when the subject is brought up and people ask for evidence of fraud you start your pedantry about "most secure".

I suppose the two things are unrelated yeah?

That must be my mistake then, you couldn't possibly be trying to imply anything, could you...

No, you're one of the good ones.

I'm sorry I fed you. I don't wish anything bad to befall you and wish you a long and healthy life full of happiness and joy.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 98903	Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader Reply #178 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:54pm lee wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 1:26pm: He just doesn't have the words.
Back to top	IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19257
Gender: male

Re: Impeach Terrorist Leader
Reply #179 - Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:56pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:53pm:

Funny, when the subject is brought up and people ask for evidence of fraud you start your pedantry about "most secure".

It is what it is. I guess when I say that it triggers you because of feelings of insecurity? Roll Eyes

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:53pm:

That must be my mistake then, you couldn't possibly be trying to imply anything, could you...

I write very plain English. It is not my fault that you bend it to what you wish. Wink

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 12^th, 2021 at 2:53pm:

I'm sorry I fed you. I don't wish anything bad to befall you and wish you a long and healthy life full of happiness and joy.

Thank you and the best for you too.

Back to top

IP Logged