Australian Politics Forum - Meghan Markle and Prince Harry

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 150846 Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #180 - Mar 16^th, 2021 at 8:26pm Gordon wrote on Mar 16^th, 2021 at 12:23pm: She's also an arsehole. Lots of accusations that she 'fed' talent to good old Harvey knowing how things turned out for them. This, from the guy who defends T****.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26587
Australia

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #181 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 4:00am

cods wrote on Mar 16^th, 2021 at 6:01pm:

well I have always had respect for Oprah until...and thanks for bringing that up gordy she looks quite a fan of Harvey as well.. I didnt approve of her interview thought it was cheap and tacky she asked very pointed deliberate questions... I remember her interview with Michael Jackson and she avoided going really deep into his relationship with little boys... yet here she is digging for dirty on the Royal Family?? all in the name of money.....she goaded them a lot for sure but they were willing so cant put all the blame on Oprah...it will be interesting to see what the bullying accusations by Meg come too a dozen people.....WOW she wasnt there all that long.. Roll Eyes

So pointed and deliberate questions is a bad thing?

Spot

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #182 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 6:30am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 17^th, 2021 at 4:00am:

cods wrote on Mar 16^th, 2021 at 6:01pm:

well I have always had respect for Oprah until...and thanks for bringing that up gordy she looks quite a fan of Harvey as well.. I didnt approve of her interview thought it was cheap and tacky she asked very pointed deliberate questions... I remember her interview with Michael Jackson and she avoided going really deep into his relationship with little boys... yet here she is digging for dirty on the Royal Family?? all in the name of money.....she goaded them a lot for sure but they were willing so cant put all the blame on Oprah...it will be interesting to see what the bullying accusations by Meg come too a dozen people.....WOW she wasnt there all that long.. Roll Eyes

So pointed and deliberate questions is a bad thing?

Spot

Harry and Meghan would have gotten a lot more "sympathy" if they had just gone and got on with Life, instead of whingeing and moaning about everything.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #183 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 7:11am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 17^th, 2021 at 4:00am:

cods wrote on Mar 16^th, 2021 at 6:01pm:

well I have always had respect for Oprah until...and thanks for bringing that up gordy she looks quite a fan of Harvey as well.. I didnt approve of her interview thought it was cheap and tacky she asked very pointed deliberate questions... I remember her interview with Michael Jackson and she avoided going really deep into his relationship with little boys... yet here she is digging for dirty on the Royal Family?? all in the name of money.....she goaded them a lot for sure but they were willing so cant put all the blame on Oprah...it will be interesting to see what the bullying accusations by Meg come too a dozen people.....WOW she wasnt there all that long.. Roll Eyes

So pointed and deliberate questions is a bad thing?

Spot

POINTED.. is that what you call were you silenced???..

she claims she was trapped in the tower like Rapunzel...

did Opera ask any questions regarding Prince Charles walking her down the aisle the fancy trip to Australia and other place all first class...also Frogmore.. oh lets forget all about that....you do know it was 3.5. hours of Palace bashing dont you?

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #184 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 7:16am

Neferti wrote on Mar 17^th, 2021 at 6:30am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 17^th, 2021 at 4:00am:

cods wrote on Mar 16^th, 2021 at 6:01pm:

well I have always had respect for Oprah until...and thanks for bringing that up gordy she looks quite a fan of Harvey as well.. I didnt approve of her interview thought it was cheap and tacky she asked very pointed deliberate questions... I remember her interview with Michael Jackson and she avoided going really deep into his relationship with little boys... yet here she is digging for dirty on the Royal Family?? all in the name of money.....she goaded them a lot for sure but they were willing so cant put all the blame on Oprah...it will be interesting to see what the bullying accusations by Meg come too a dozen people.....WOW she wasnt there all that long.. Roll Eyes

So pointed and deliberate questions is a bad thing?

Spot

Harry and Meghan would have gotten a lot more "sympathy" if they had just gone and got on with Life, instead of whingeing and moaning about everything.

or if they would dump the Duke and Duchess titles for Mr and Mrs.....dont tell me the titles dont open doors...they werent too unhappy when given those were they?.....

what spot doesnt get, is Harry is slapping a whole country not just his family..... Angry

just as the Duke of Windsor did..

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21746 Gordon Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #185 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 8:24am
Back to top	PhotoPictureResizer_210317_092316521_crop_1035x430.jpg (67 KB \| 4 ) IBI IP Logged

lee Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 20121 Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #186 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 12:09pm I see in the news today the Church denying they got married before the big service. How does that go with her "truthiness"?
Back to top	IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #187 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 12:11pm lee wrote on Mar 17^th, 2021 at 12:09pm: I see in the news today the Church denying they got married before the big service. How does that go with her "truthiness"? Depends on whether people outside the Church are legally authorised to wed two humans.
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 20121
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #188 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 12:23pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 17^th, 2021 at 12:11pm:

Depends on whether people outside the Church are legally authorised to wed two humans.

She apparently said it was the Archbishop of Canterbury. Roll Eyes

"'Meghan is an American, she does not understand': Vicar says Church of England told him that Meghan and Prince Harry's 'garden wedding' was no more than a 'private conversation' with Archbishop of Canterbury"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9363159/Vicar-says-Church-told-Meghan-H...

Back to top

IP Logged

Fuzzball Gold Member Offline Posts: 6384 Australia Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #189 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 1:11pm Me-again is a calculating bitch, she does however lack the intelligence to realise that we all won't be taken in by her 'married twice' horse schit......... Silly Harry has swapped his birthright for greedy pussy......
Back to top	Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!" IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #190 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 1:34pm

ROFLMAO

Quote:

A GoFundMe page set up to pay off the mortgage on Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s $US14.6 million ($A18.8 million) California estate has gone bust – after raising a measly $US110 ($142), a report says.

Anastasia Hanson, 56, of California told Britain’s The Sun that she started the fundraising effort because she seriously felt sorry for the multi-millionaire royal couple – after Harry publicly whined to Oprah Winfrey about being financially cut off by Buckingham Palace.

“When they came to the USA, they were without jobs and with limited funds,” said Hanson, who lives about 25 minutes from the princely pair’s palatial estate in swanky Montecito.

“They’ve stated that they’ve had a very rough time, so this fundraiser is a way to give help, compassion, and love by paying their home loan in full.”

https://www.news.com.au/finance/real-estate/buying/supporter-of-meghan-and-harry...

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #191 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 1:36pm

lee wrote on Mar 17^th, 2021 at 12:23pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 17^th, 2021 at 12:11pm:

Depends on whether people outside the Church are legally authorised to wed two humans.

She apparently said it was the Archbishop of Canterbury. Roll Eyes

"'Meghan is an American, she does not understand': Vicar says Church of England told him that Meghan and Prince Harry's 'garden wedding' was no more than a 'private conversation' with Archbishop of Canterbury"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9363159/Vicar-says-Church-told-Meghan-H...

"'Meghan is an American, she does not understand': Vicar says Church of England told him that Meghan and Prince Harry's 'garden wedding' was no more than a 'private conversation' with Archbishop of Canterbury"

That statements a bit odd isn't it.

Plus it isn't really saying shes lying, she just misinterpreted.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 20121
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #192 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 2:32pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 17^th, 2021 at 1:36pm:

Plus it isn't really saying shes lying, she just misinterpreted.

Yeah. No witnesses to signing of marriage certificate. Yep she really doesn't know. Very misinterpreted.

" "So, like, the vows that we have framed in our room are just the two of us in our backyard with the Archbishop of Canterbury," Meghan continued.

Harry then joked: "Just the three of us, just the three of us." "

https://honey.nine.com.au/royals/harry-and-meghan-oprah-interview-vicar-comments...

Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #193 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 2:34pm Then again the Archbishop could hvae misinterpreted he's over 60.
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21908
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #194 - Mar 17^th, 2021 at 3:42pm

I've been wondering why so many people have been so quick to not even consider that what was being said by Megan and Harry is true and what that would actually mean.

Instead, the Royals are the victims here?

It's like the usual suspects, always complaining about victimhood in others, especially the "woke" have projected their own victimhood onto the Royals and it just happens to be a half cast and the black interviewer who are the bad guys.

Why do good and bad always seem to fall across the same lines with these people, and why do they get so very emotional when you call them out on it?

Back to top

IP Logged