Australian Politics Forum - Meghan Markle and Prince Harry

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #165 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:29am

Yadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:21am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:46am:

Yadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:40am:

Anyone with 2 brain cells knows,

Yeah but whats your story then

Oh ! Such wit bojack !

Thinking of that repartee on your part, will keep me amused for the rest of this week.

He's a University lecturer folks.

So he must be very, very clever. Shocked

Indeed.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 57144
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #166 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:32am

BYadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:21am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:46am:

Yadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:40am:

Anyone with 2 brain cells knows,

Yeah but whats your story then

Oh ! Such wit bojack !

Thinking of that repartee on your part, will keep me amused for the rest of this week.

He's a University lecturer folks.

So he must be very, very clever. Shocked

He's a lab technician.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #167 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:36am

Frank wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:32am:

BYadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:21am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:46am:

Yadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:40am:

Anyone with 2 brain cells knows,

Yeah but whats your story then

Oh ! Such wit bojack !

Thinking of that repartee on your part, will keep me amused for the rest of this week.

He's a University lecturer folks.

So he must be very, very clever. Shocked

He's a lab technician.

Damn Frank must have seen my LinkedIn

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 57144
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #168 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:42am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:36am:

Frank wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:32am:

BYadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:21am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:46am:

Yadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:40am:

Anyone with 2 brain cells knows,

Yeah but whats your story then

Oh ! Such wit bojack !

Thinking of that repartee on your part, will keep me amused for the rest of this week.

He's a University lecturer folks.

So he must be very, very clever. Shocked

He's a lab technician.

Damn Frank must have seen my LinkedIn

Well, you are not a university lecturer. (Although in many cases that would be damning enough...)

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #169 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 4:00pm

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:03am:

It's quite simple really, Cods. If the firm treated her kindly, the media wouldn't have been so hostile.

Can you not follow through this simple logical pathway? Why is it so difficult for you?

Did the firm ever once seek a correction? Or a retraction? Or use there significant influence to suggest positive reporting?

Or did they lie, Cods? Did they all lie to demonise a woman not seen fit to assume the position?

come on when did the FIRM tell the media to BAKC OFF FROM PRINCE ANDREW??????.....

THEY DONT DO THAT ANYMORE>..

tell us what the media said to her they have never said about anyone else.?? did she see the press on prince Andrew..?????.....they had 3.5. hours of whinging.... Hes 35 shes 39... for gods sake ... would you fight your sons battles in his work place for him????>..

I think he would be dead embarrassed if you did....get over the bleeding heart stuff you are so bad at it....all you do is try to make yourself out to be Mother Teresa and believe me you aint...

where did they DEMONISE THIS WOMEN?????????..

just show me what you are raving about....

Back to top

IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #170 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 4:03pm Fuzzball wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:07am: You really do post utter schit mothball she will be blaming me next!.... shes desperate to put the blame on ozpolians.... only righties of course.......dont count the mongs.. cant you tell?
Back to top	IP Logged

Neferti Gold Member Offline Posts: 7965 Canberra Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #171 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 4:37pm
Back to top	« Last Edit: Mar 16^th, 2021 at 4:17pm by Neferti » IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #172 - Mar 16^th, 2021 at 7:57am the Queen has outsourced the enquiry into Meghans bullying of 12 staff members in 2019. and Meghans already demanding to take part. as everyone does when they are being investigated...lol
Back to top	IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21732 Gordon Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #173 - Mar 16^th, 2021 at 8:22am Lots of holes appearing in Megan's story. And Oprah is a fkucing cow.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26587 Australia	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #174 - Mar 16^th, 2021 at 10:59am Gordon wrote on Mar 16^th, 2021 at 8:22am: Lots of holes appearing in Megan's story. And Oprah is a fkucing cow. What is it you dont like about oprah? Spot
Back to top	Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

ProudKangaroo Gold Member Offline The Sandstorm is coming 🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵 Posts: 21901 Meeanjin (Brisbane)	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #175 - Mar 16^th, 2021 at 11:17am Gordon wrote on Mar 16^th, 2021 at 8:22am: Lots of holes appearing in Megan's story. And Oprah is a fkucing cow. Likely that she's a woman, or black, or vastly more successful than Gordo, or a combination of all 3.
Back to top	IP Logged

NorthOfNorth

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #176 - Mar 16^th, 2021 at 11:36am

One of the most telling revelations about the dubious veracity of Markle's comments was when she made the claim that she didn't know much about British royal protocol prior to marrying Harry.

As, I think, an incredulous Bill Maher quipped, "Who did she think she was marrying, Ed Sheeran?".

And if it was just about her not having access to, or confidence of, born aristocrats, there was, of course, Kate Middleton she could have had a deep conversation with.

Failing that, was speaking with the Australian-born Princess Mary of Denmark out of the question?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 16^th, 2021 at 11:43am by NorthOfNorth »

Conviction is the art of being certain

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21732
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #177 - Mar 16^th, 2021 at 12:23pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 16^th, 2021 at 11:17am:

Gordon wrote on Mar 16^th, 2021 at 8:22am:

Lots of holes appearing in Megan's story.

And Oprah is a fkucing cow.

Likely that she's a woman, or black, or vastly more successful than Gordo, or a combination of all 3.

Fkuck you're a woke wanker with your head so up your arse.
Read the following then apologise please.

She's a lifelong peddler of total bullschit.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/1/9/16868216/oprah-winfrey-pseudosci...

And just plain nonsense.

https://www.salon.com/2007/03/05/the_secret/

She's also an arsehole. Lots of accusations that she 'fed' talent to good old Harvey knowing how things turned out for them.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #178 - Mar 16^th, 2021 at 6:01pm

well I have always had respect for Oprah until...and thanks for bringing that up gordy she looks quite a fan of Harvey as well.. I didnt approve of her interview thought it was cheap and tacky she asked very pointed deliberate questions... I remember her interview with Michael Jackson and she avoided going really deep into his relationship with little boys... yet here she is digging for dirty on the Royal Family?? all in the name of money.....she goaded them a lot for sure but they were willing so cant put all the blame on Oprah...it will be interesting to see what the bullying accusations by Meg come too a dozen people.....WOW she wasnt there all that long.. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21732
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #179 - Mar 16^th, 2021 at 6:26pm

Copied from the net

A 36 year old man, allegedly a military veteran, took his 39 year old wife to go on global television bashing his 72 year old father for failing to give him enough money to support his family and therefore he could only use money inherited from his mother to get by (including buying a 14 million dollar crappy shed in Hollywood). Meanwhile, this couple close to their 40s accuses their 94 year old grandma of not caring about their mental health and failing to protect them against bad people——- I guess I’m either too old or too out of date to understand this “woke” couple (I’m a 37 year old working mom living in California).

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged