Australian Politics Forum - Meghan Markle and Prince Harry

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #150 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:59am

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:53am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:49am:

[quote]numerous times they apparently asked 'the firm' to comment on press releases that were false and the firm refused.[/quote]

you have PROOF OF THAT.....or do you believe everyone as long as they agree with you...

you wouldnt be that simple minded surely! Undecided

Sorry Cods are you saying the tabloid media was kind to Meghan? That she had no cause to seek clarification?

You tell me, you read that crap. Did any of them ever retract anything?

seriously and you cant read the question... oh dear..

the reply was not about the press pet but the FIRM read it again pet... I am trying to be reasonable.... its a word you not familiar with

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36384
Gender: female

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #151 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 7:15am

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:59am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:53am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:49am:

[quote]numerous times they apparently asked 'the firm' to comment on press releases that were false and the firm refused.[/quote]

you have PROOF OF THAT.....or do you believe everyone as long as they agree with you...

you wouldnt be that simple minded surely! Undecided

Sorry Cods are you saying the tabloid media was kind to Meghan? That she had no cause to seek clarification?

You tell me, you read that crap. Did any of them ever retract anything?

seriously and you cant read the question... oh dear..

the reply was not about the press pet but the FIRM read it again pet... I am trying to be reasonable.... its a word you not familiar with

Yes Cods. The firm not protecting her form the press.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 117811 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #152 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 7:21am capitosinora wrote on Mar 14^th, 2021 at 10:03am: And who is the Australian Royal racist? https://digitpatrox.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Resize-23-780x470.jpg The Queen is not amused by this awful cartoon. "WHY MEGHAN QUIT BUCKINGHAM," with Meghan drawn to say: "Because I couldn't breathe anymore!"
Back to top	IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #153 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:24am

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 7:15am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:59am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:53am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:49am:

[quote]numerous times they apparently asked 'the firm' to comment on press releases that were false and the firm refused.[/quote]

you have PROOF OF THAT.....or do you believe everyone as long as they agree with you...

you wouldnt be that simple minded surely! Undecided

Sorry Cods are you saying the tabloid media was kind to Meghan? That she had no cause to seek clarification?

You tell me, you read that crap. Did any of them ever retract anything?

seriously and you cant read the question... oh dear..

the reply was not about the press pet but the FIRM read it again pet... I am trying to be reasonable.... its a word you not familiar with

Yes Cods. The firm not protecting her form the press.

Oh I dont take your word for it dear.. WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THE FIRM DIDNT PROTECT HER?...

comprehension not your good point?

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #154 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:26am

Bobby. wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 7:21am:

capitosinora wrote on Mar 14^th, 2021 at 10:03am:

And who is the Australian Royal racist?

https://digitpatrox.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Resize-23-780x470.jpg

The Queen is not amused by this awful cartoon.

"WHY MEGHAN QUIT BUCKINGHAM," with Meghan drawn to say: "Because I couldn't breathe anymore!"

https://digitpatrox.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Resize-23-780x470.jpg

the Queen is not a WUZ bobby she couldnt careless....unlike some..

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36384
Gender: female

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #155 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:27am

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:24am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 7:15am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:59am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:53am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:49am:

[quote]numerous times they apparently asked 'the firm' to comment on press releases that were false and the firm refused.[/quote]

you have PROOF OF THAT.....or do you believe everyone as long as they agree with you...

you wouldnt be that simple minded surely! Undecided

Sorry Cods are you saying the tabloid media was kind to Meghan? That she had no cause to seek clarification?

You tell me, you read that crap. Did any of them ever retract anything?

seriously and you cant read the question... oh dear..

the reply was not about the press pet but the FIRM read it again pet... I am trying to be reasonable.... its a word you not familiar with

Yes Cods. The firm not protecting her form the press.

Oh I dont take your word for it dear.. WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THE FIRM DIDNT PROTECT HER?...

comprehension not your good point?

Because they never corrected the gutter press you get your jollies from, despite being repeatedly asked to do so.

Anyway, answer the question, do you think the tabloid media was kind to Meghan?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Yadda

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 22691
A cat with a view

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #156 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:40am

John Smith wrote on Mar 14^th, 2021 at 5:42pm:

cods wrote on Mar 14^th, 2021 at 7:59am:

so its the press that drove them to leave ! not the Palace??...gees thanks for clearing that up

it was both ...

numerous times they apparently asked 'the firm' to comment on press releases that were false and the firm refused.

Anyone with 2 brain cells knows, that any time that a 'speculative' story is printed in the MSM, about some prominent public figure,
then the quickest way to let that story 'die', and to disappear, IS FOR ANYONE WHO WAS NAMED IN THAT SPECULATIVE STORY, TO NOT COMMENT ON IT.
...AT ALL.

'The Palace' knows that.

You would think that at least Prince Harry would know that too.

Back to top

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #157 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:46am Yadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:40am: Anyone with 2 brain cells knows, Yeah but whats your story then
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 117811
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #158 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:47am

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:26am:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 7:21am:

capitosinora wrote on Mar 14^th, 2021 at 10:03am:

And who is the Australian Royal racist?

https://digitpatrox.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Resize-23-780x470.jpg

The Queen is not amused by this awful cartoon.

"WHY MEGHAN QUIT BUCKINGHAM," with Meghan drawn to say: "Because I couldn't breathe anymore!"

https://digitpatrox.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Resize-23-780x470.jpg

the Queen is not a WUZ bobby she couldnt careless....unlike some..

I did but see her passing by .......

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #159 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:55am

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:27am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:24am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 7:15am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:59am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:53am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:49am:

[quote]numerous times they apparently asked 'the firm' to comment on press releases that were false and the firm refused.[/quote]

you have PROOF OF THAT.....or do you believe everyone as long as they agree with you...

you wouldnt be that simple minded surely! Undecided

Sorry Cods are you saying the tabloid media was kind to Meghan? That she had no cause to seek clarification?

You tell me, you read that crap. Did any of them ever retract anything?

seriously and you cant read the question... oh dear..

the reply was not about the press pet but the FIRM read it again pet... I am trying to be reasonable.... its a word you not familiar with

Yes Cods. The firm not protecting her form the press.

Oh I dont take your word for it dear.. WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THE FIRM DIDNT PROTECT HER?...

comprehension not your good point?

Because they never corrected the gutter press you get your jollies from, despite being repeatedly asked to do so.

Anyway, answer the question, do you think the tabloid media was kind to Meghan?

oh here she goes changing direction again

I ASKED THE QUESTION FIRST>>>> WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THE FIRM DIDNT SUPPORT HER????>>.its so simple.....WHAT DOES IT MATTER WHAT I THINK???? IF THE PRESS TREATED HER KINDLY OR NOT WHAT THE HELL DOES IT MATTER WHAT I THINK????.

should i have cried all over the keyboard for them??? seriously your raving.....

.they are hypocrites...they still carry the TITLE OF DUKE AND DUCHESS still live in a million dollar house on million dollar row...

he cries poor me!!!! daddy didnt pay me....daddy didnt take my calls....hes a man for gods sakes... a man who has lived in the limelight since the day he was born.....and she would have enjoyed the hollywood treatment from the press.....

Back to top

IP Logged

The Heartless Felon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2869 Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #160 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:55am Every time I see anything about these two I remember this: In days of old when knights were bold And swords were made of tin. Ginger Meggs, with bandy legs, Went out to fight for Min. Make it stop...
Back to top	IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36384
Gender: female

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #161 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:03am

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:55am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:27am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:24am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 7:15am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:59am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:53am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:49am:

[quote]numerous times they apparently asked 'the firm' to comment on press releases that were false and the firm refused.[/quote]

you have PROOF OF THAT.....or do you believe everyone as long as they agree with you...

you wouldnt be that simple minded surely! Undecided

Sorry Cods are you saying the tabloid media was kind to Meghan? That she had no cause to seek clarification?

You tell me, you read that crap. Did any of them ever retract anything?

seriously and you cant read the question... oh dear..

the reply was not about the press pet but the FIRM read it again pet... I am trying to be reasonable.... its a word you not familiar with

Yes Cods. The firm not protecting her form the press.

Oh I dont take your word for it dear.. WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THE FIRM DIDNT PROTECT HER?...

comprehension not your good point?

Because they never corrected the gutter press you get your jollies from, despite being repeatedly asked to do so.

Anyway, answer the question, do you think the tabloid media was kind to Meghan?

oh here she goes changing direction again

I ASKED THE QUESTION FIRST>>>> WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THE FIRM DIDNT SUPPORT HER????>>.its so simple.....WHAT DOES IT MATTER WHAT I THINK???? IF THE PRESS TREATED HER KINDLY OR NOT WHAT THE HELL DOES IT MATTER WHAT I THINK????.

should i have cried all over the keyboard for them??? seriously your raving.....

.they are hypocrites...they still carry the TITLE OF DUKE AND DUCHESS still live in a million dollar house on million dollar row...

he cries poor me!!!! daddy didnt pay me....daddy didnt take my calls....hes a man for gods sakes... a man who has lived in the limelight since the day he was born.....and she would have enjoyed the hollywood treatment from the press.....

It's quite simple really, Cods. If the firm treated her kindly, the media wouldn't have been so hostile.

Can you not follow through this simple logical pathway? Why is it so difficult for you?

Did the firm ever once seek a correction? Or a retraction? Or use there significant influence to suggest positive reporting?

Or did they lie, Cods? Did they all lie to demonise a woman not seen fit to assume the position?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 57181 Gender:	Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Reply #162 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:07am Everyone was very positive about Meghan at the beginning. The alarm bells probably went off when nobody from her family attended the wedding except her mother. And now Hazza is similarly estranged from his own family.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Fuzzball

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 6384
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #163 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:07am

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:03am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:55am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:27am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:24am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 7:15am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:59am:

mothra wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:53am:

cods wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 6:49am:

[quote]numerous times they apparently asked 'the firm' to comment on press releases that were false and the firm refused.[/quote]

you have PROOF OF THAT.....or do you believe everyone as long as they agree with you...

you wouldnt be that simple minded surely! Undecided

Sorry Cods are you saying the tabloid media was kind to Meghan? That she had no cause to seek clarification?

You tell me, you read that crap. Did any of them ever retract anything?

seriously and you cant read the question... oh dear..

the reply was not about the press pet but the FIRM read it again pet... I am trying to be reasonable.... its a word you not familiar with

Yes Cods. The firm not protecting her form the press.

Oh I dont take your word for it dear.. WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THE FIRM DIDNT PROTECT HER?...

comprehension not your good point?

Because they never corrected the gutter press you get your jollies from, despite being repeatedly asked to do so.

Anyway, answer the question, do you think the tabloid media was kind to Meghan?

oh here she goes changing direction again

I ASKED THE QUESTION FIRST>>>> WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THE FIRM DIDNT SUPPORT HER????>>.its so simple.....WHAT DOES IT MATTER WHAT I THINK???? IF THE PRESS TREATED HER KINDLY OR NOT WHAT THE HELL DOES IT MATTER WHAT I THINK????.

should i have cried all over the keyboard for them??? seriously your raving.....

.they are hypocrites...they still carry the TITLE OF DUKE AND DUCHESS still live in a million dollar house on million dollar row...

he cries poor me!!!! daddy didnt pay me....daddy didnt take my calls....hes a man for gods sakes... a man who has lived in the limelight since the day he was born.....and she would have enjoyed the hollywood treatment from the press.....

It's quite simple really, Cods. If the firm treated her kindly, the media wouldn't have been so hostile.

Can you not follow through this simple logical pathway? Why is it so difficult for you?

Did the firm ever once seek a correction? Or a retraction? Or use there significant influence to suggest positive reporting?

Or did they lie, Cods? Did they all lie to demonise a woman not seen fit to assume the position?

You really do post utter schit mothball.......

Back to top

Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting,
"Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!"

IP Logged

Yadda

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 22691
A cat with a view

Re: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Reply #164 - Mar 15^th, 2021 at 9:21am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:46am:

Yadda wrote on Mar 15^th, 2021 at 8:40am:

Anyone with 2 brain cells knows,

Yeah but whats your story then

Oh ! Such wit bojack !

Thinking of that repartee on your part, will keep me amused for the rest of this week.

He's a University lecturer folks.

So he must be very, very clever. Shocked

Back to top

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31

IP Logged