Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
The death of the manual transmission (Read 3066 times)
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15695
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #15 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 12:56pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 9th, 2020 at 8:18pm:
I've always owned only manual cars.
I don't see the point of an auto other than being lazy.


Automatics are so much more relaxing, especially during Summer heat. Why row your way through traffic?   Roll Eyes

The only saving grace of a manual is if you get stuck on a railway crossing ... at least you can bung it in 1st and use the starter motor to get off the crossing.  Smiley


Back to top
 

Fire the LIAR in 2028!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120402
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #16 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 1:20pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 12:56pm:
Bobby. wrote on Oct 9th, 2020 at 8:18pm:
I've always owned only manual cars.
I don't see the point of an auto other than being lazy.


Automatics are so much more relaxing, especially during Summer heat. Why row your way through traffic?   Roll Eyes

The only saving grace of a manual is if you get stuck on a railway crossing ... at least you can bung it in 1st and use the starter motor to get off the crossing.  Smiley




I like to drive my car, not let the car drive me.
I can choose the gear I want depending on the situation.
I feel far more in control when I have a manual.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 56793
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #17 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 5:09pm
 
Travelling around NZ in a Camper (Fiat top of the range). I found that driving 'manual' saved thousands in $$$ Fuel costs. But Auto was far easier to use when in the Cities and high density traffic. It was Dual so that was great.

Working at Toyota the Mechanics would 'fix' the Manual Gear Boxes while the Auto's they replaced fully - which cost way more for the Owner.

Manual is good for those who 'love to drive'. While Auto's are really for people who consider their cars just a means to an end. I self taught myself to drive Manual in a 1967 slant Dodge 16 footer. No power steering and a shotty 1st gear. Would fish-tail right out if having to break suddenly on a wet road.

These 'electronic' engine cars are just a 'costly' gimmick.
They don't make their money on Manuals anymore - they want people to spend more. Electronic cars fail more in the extreme heat outback more than Manual-Mechanical vehicles.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41824
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #18 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 5:30pm
 
Jasin wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 5:09pm:
Travelling around NZ in a Camper (Fiat top of the range). I found that driving 'manual' saved thousands in $$$ Fuel costs. But Auto was far easier to use when in the Cities and high density traffic. It was Dual so that was great.

Working at Toyota the Mechanics would 'fix' the Manual Gear Boxes while the Auto's they replaced fully - which cost way more for the Owner.

Manual is good for those who 'love to drive'. While Auto's are really for people who consider their cars just a means to an end. I self taught myself to drive Manual in a 1967 slant Dodge 16 footer. No power steering and a shotty 1st gear. Would fish-tail right out if having to break suddenly on a wet road.

These 'electronic' engine cars are just a 'costly' gimmick.
They don't make their money on Manuals anymore - they want people to spend more. Electronic cars fail more in the extreme heat outback more than Manual-Mechanical vehicles.



' ..........  I found that driving 'manual' saved thousands in $$$ Fuel costs.  ..........'

Do you mean to drive an auto as though it were a manual when appropriate?
eg, lock it into a low gear when going up or down  hills?


Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 56793
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #19 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:06pm
 
We compared our fuel cost to kms with other Campers who were in Autos only Campers during our lengthy trip. Catching up with many in the popular Camper Parks that some are better than the Sydney Hilton and Hyatt. As I mostly drove the Camper manual and only flicked to auto in congested traffic conditions/parking. Driving in Dunedin was madness. Manuals use less fuel as Autos always 'over-rev' conservatively by 1000rpms. Even on open flat road - manual uses less fuel.

With a Manual - I always feel more in control of the vehicle.
I don't trust 'electronic' intervention. I've seen those sensors on cars fail often. People putting faith in that, rather than actually cautiously looking for themselves.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21850
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #20 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:11pm
 
DC with paddles is lovely....but xxy to fix when they WILL break down.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Wolseley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1453
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #21 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:11pm
 
Jasin wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 5:09pm:
I self taught myself to drive Manual in a 1967 slant Dodge 16 footer. No power steering and a shotty 1st gear.


Sounds like the Austin 1800 I learnt to drive on or, although it may not count as learning, as I wasn't old enough to drive on the road at the time, a 1949 Jowett Javelin.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41824
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #22 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:12pm
 
Jasin wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:06pm:
We compared our fuel cost to kms with other Campers who were in Autos only Campers during our lengthy trip. Catching up with many in the popular Camper Parks that some are better than the Sydney Hilton and Hyatt. As I mostly drove the Camper manual and only flicked to auto in congested traffic conditions/parking. Driving in Dunedin was madness. Manuals use less fuel as Autos always 'over-rev' conservatively by 1000rpms. Even on open flat road - manual uses less fuel.

With a Manual - I always feel more in control of the vehicle.
I don't trust 'electronic' intervention. I've seen those sensors on cars fail often. People putting faith in that, rather than actually cautiously looking for themselves.


Thanks.
that leads to a topic on how to drive autos.
I drive them quite unlike most other people.
I often drive them in a manual mode to keep the revs up.
The motor operates over a wider rev range.
It means there is good engine braking, the auto's torque converter is locked up. I have no 'auto slippage.'

Autos use more fuel when they are changing gears or in the 'slipping' mode of operation.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Wolseley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1453
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #23 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:19pm
 
Jasin wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:06pm:
Manuals use less fuel as Autos always 'over-rev' conservatively by 1000rpms. Even on open flat road - manual uses less fuel.


Garbage.  This is only true of the older style of automatic transmissions.  Present day automatic transmissions can change gears more efficiently even than the best driver, and save on fuel in the process.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120402
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #24 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:13pm
 
Wolseley wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:19pm:
Jasin wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:06pm:
Manuals use less fuel as Autos always 'over-rev' conservatively by 1000rpms. Even on open flat road - manual uses less fuel.


Garbage.  This is only true of the older style of automatic transmissions.  Present day automatic transmissions can change gears more efficiently even than the best driver, and save on fuel in the process.



An auto transmission can't be as a efficient as a direct
gear connected drive.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41824
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #25 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:43pm
 
Quote:
The Aston Martin DBS Superleggera. The Toyota Supra. The Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio. The BMW M5. The Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk. The Rolls-Royce Phantom. Though these cars are all different, there's one thing they (and many other cars) have in common: ZF's 8HP eight-speed torque converter automatic transmission.

First introduced in 2008, ZF's eight-speed gearbox has come to occupy the transmission tunnels of countless new cars, from big American trucks to compact hatchbacks and ultra-luxurious grand tourers. In some cases, it's even replaced dual-clutch transmissions. ZF sold an astonishing 3.5 million units in 2017 alone, according to our colleagues at Car and Driver. How has the 8HP come to conquer the market? Well, it's very good at a lot of things............


https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/car-technology/a27332349/why-so-many-carma...
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41824
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #26 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:45pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:13pm:
Wolseley wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:19pm:
Jasin wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:06pm:
Manuals use less fuel as Autos always 'over-rev' conservatively by 1000rpms. Even on open flat road - manual uses less fuel.


Garbage.  This is only true of the older style of automatic transmissions.  Present day automatic transmissions can change gears more efficiently even than the best driver, and save on fuel in the process.



An auto transmission can't be as a efficient as a direct
gear connected drive.


In theory, no.

In practise, they may be or the difference might be insignificant.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21850
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #27 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:52pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:13pm:
Wolseley wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:19pm:
Jasin wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:06pm:
Manuals use less fuel as Autos always 'over-rev' conservatively by 1000rpms. Even on open flat road - manual uses less fuel.


Garbage.  This is only true of the older style of automatic transmissions.  Present day automatic transmissions can change gears more efficiently even than the best driver, and save on fuel in the process.



An auto transmission can't be as a efficient as a direct
gear connected drive.


You're thinking of an old school 3 speed slushbox. I drove a new 8 speed Kluger today, can hardly hear the engine and the transmission is in the perfect gear every moment.  Lovely.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120402
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #28 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:57pm
 


Gordon wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:52pm:
Bobby. wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:13pm:
Wolseley wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:19pm:
Jasin wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 6:06pm:
Manuals use less fuel as Autos always 'over-rev' conservatively by 1000rpms. Even on open flat road - manual uses less fuel.


Garbage.  This is only true of the older style of automatic transmissions.  Present day automatic transmissions can change gears more efficiently even than the best driver, and save on fuel in the process.



An auto transmission can't be as a efficient as a direct
gear connected drive.


You're thinking of an old school 3 speed slushbox. I drove a new 8 speed Kluger today, can hardly hear the engine and the transmission is in the perfect gear every moment.  Lovely.


Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 10th, 2020 at 7:45pm:
In theory, no.

In practise, they may be or the difference might be insignificant.



I was referring to the fluid drive auto transmissions.
They don't connect via gears but they use hydraulic fluid.
Those auto transmissions get very hot and they
waste a lot of energy.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 56793
Gender: male
Re: The death of the manual transmission
Reply #29 - Oct 10th, 2020 at 8:12pm
 
Manual is just another type of vehicle the Car Industry can phase out and off the roads to force people to purchase another newer vehicle. Worse than a Corona in an Aged Care Home.

I like the FJ Cruisers of Toyota. But many owners agree that they would prefer them in Diesel and Manual.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print