Australian Politics Forum - Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS

AiA

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 18405
Gender: male

Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS
Sep 17^th, 2020 at 1:20am

Scientific American Magazine has made the first political endorsement in its 175 year history. Donald Trump's deadly science denial and propensity for lying is so unconscionable that anyone with a meaningful concept of truth must now speak out against the very idea of such a deeply ignorant and dishonest person holding power over other living beings.

Back to top

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21068
Gender: male

Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS
Reply #1 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 5:52pm

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 1:20am:

Scientific American Magazine has made the first political endorsement in its 175 year history. Donald Trump's deadly science denial and propensity for lying is so unconscionable that anyone with a meaningful concept of truth must now speak out against the very idea of such a deeply ignorant and dishonest person holding power over other living beings.

What science has he denied. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

AiA

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 18405
Gender: male

Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS
Reply #2 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 8:59pm

lee wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 5:52pm:

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 1:20am:

Scientific American Magazine has made the first political endorsement in its 175 year history. Donald Trump's deadly science denial and propensity for lying is so unconscionable that anyone with a meaningful concept of truth must now speak out against the very idea of such a deeply ignorant and dishonest person holding power over other living beings.

What science has he denied. Wink

You may want to consider looking into the matter. Scientific American Magazine isn't that porn mag with the cracked spine and pages stuck together that you keep under your bed. These are serious-minded professionals.

Back to top

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 120434
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS
Reply #3 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 9:04pm

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 1:20am:

Scientific American Magazine has made the first political endorsement in its 175 year history. Donald Trump's deadly science denial and propensity for lying is so unconscionable that anyone with a meaningful concept of truth must now speak out against the very idea of such a deeply ignorant and dishonest person holding power over other living beings.

here:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientific-american-endorses-joe-bide...

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21068
Gender: male

Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS
Reply #4 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 9:42pm

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 8:59pm:

lee wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 5:52pm:

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 1:20am:

Scientific American Magazine has made the first political endorsement in its 175 year history. Donald Trump's deadly science denial and propensity for lying is so unconscionable that anyone with a meaningful concept of truth must now speak out against the very idea of such a deeply ignorant and dishonest person holding power over other living beings.

What science has he denied. Wink

You may want to consider looking into the matter. Scientific American Magazine isn't that porn mag with the cracked spine and pages stuck together that you keep under your bed. These are serious-minded professionals.

Scientific American used to be a scientific magazine. Now it is just a leftist rag. But perhaps you can show the current "scientific" credentials. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 58838 Gender:	Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS Reply #5 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 9:44pm No wonder people are pissing on 'experts'
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS Reply #6 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 9:55pm Because people are idiots?
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 58838 Gender:	Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS Reply #7 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 10:01pm No. Because 'experts' are guns for hire.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS Reply #8 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 10:08pm Oh reqally, cause somehow the non experts on say Sky arent guns for hire?
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

AiA Gold Member Offline Posts: 18405 Gender:	Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS Reply #9 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 10:12pm lee wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 9:42pm: Scientific American used to be a scientific magazine. Now it is just a leftist rag. Oh? Go back to your crusty porn mag, lee. The Scientific Revolution was a long, long time ago and you and yours can't go back no matter how hard you try.
Back to top	“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 58838 Gender:	Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS Reply #10 - Sep 17^th, 2020 at 10:16pm JPrime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 10:08pm: Oh reqally, cause somehow the non experts on say Sky arent guns for hire? They are not trading on being 'experts'.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS
Reply #11 - Sep 18^th, 2020 at 8:40am

Frank wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 10:16pm:

JPrime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 10:08pm:

Oh reqally, cause somehow the non experts on say Sky arent guns for hire?

They are not trading on being 'experts'.

So why do you classify someone whos worked for many years in a field gotten qualifications in that area as an 'expert'

Plus the amount of confidence those idiots on Sky talk with, it seems l;ike they think they are experts

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS
Reply #12 - Sep 18^th, 2020 at 8:41am

lee wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 9:42pm:

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 8:59pm:

lee wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 5:52pm:

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 1:20am:

Scientific American Magazine has made the first political endorsement in its 175 year history. Donald Trump's deadly science denial and propensity for lying is so unconscionable that anyone with a meaningful concept of truth must now speak out against the very idea of such a deeply ignorant and dishonest person holding power over other living beings.

What science has he denied. Wink

You may want to consider looking into the matter. Scientific American Magazine isn't that porn mag with the cracked spine and pages stuck together that you keep under your bed. These are serious-minded professionals.

Scientific American used to be a scientific magazine. Now it is just a leftist rag. But perhaps you can show the current "scientific" credentials. Grin

And boom there we have it.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21068
Gender: male

Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS
Reply #13 - Sep 18^th, 2020 at 11:37am

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 10:12pm:

lee wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 9:42pm:

Scientific American used to be a scientific magazine. Now it is just a leftist rag.

Oh? Go back to your crusty porn mag, lee. The Scientific Revolution was a long, long time ago and you and yours can't go back no matter how hard you try.

So no evidence for their expertise then? Why am I not surprised. You do know science is an ongoing venture? It doesn't stagnate.

Perhaps you could point out where they are "right" about their scientific conclusions that they draw. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21068
Gender: male

Re: Scientific American Magazine: A FIRST IN 175 YEARS
Reply #14 - Sep 18^th, 2020 at 11:39am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 18^th, 2020 at 8:41am:

lee wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 9:42pm:

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 8:59pm:

lee wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 5:52pm:

AiA wrote on Sep 17^th, 2020 at 1:20am:

Scientific American Magazine has made the first political endorsement in its 175 year history. Donald Trump's deadly science denial and propensity for lying is so unconscionable that anyone with a meaningful concept of truth must now speak out against the very idea of such a deeply ignorant and dishonest person holding power over other living beings.

What science has he denied. Wink

j

You may want to consider looking into the matter. Scientific American Magazine isn't that porn mag with the cracked spine and pages stuck together that you keep under your bed. These are serious-minded professionals.

Scientific American used to be a scientific magazine. Now it is just a leftist rag. But perhaps you can show the current "scientific" credentials. Grin

And boom there we have it.

Boom goes BH. He just doesn't know what he means. Perhaps you can show where SA is "right" on their purported "science". Wink

Back to top

IP Logged