Why is it, do you think, that when any group other than White seeks to establish supremacy - they are never considered supremacists - but any single White who goes out and hits back is a Supremacist right off the bat?

Blacks can Rampage over nothing - Mohamedans can kill and maim over some crazy idea of religious supremacy and oppression - feminists can carry on endlessly over their imagined second class status in the West (LMAO) - poofs can carry on like pork chops over their alleged oppression etc - each and every one of these groups and others can demand special rights and privileges and nobody ever labels them 'supremacists'....

But one white guy - One White Guy - over whom nobody has any control or influence - does the same, and he is automatically a White Supremacist.

I seriously think some of you need your heads read.... I would rather have thought that Supremacists are the ones demanding - and often getting - special rights and privileges.      

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Aug 24^th, 2020 at 4:13pm:


In all the examples you have given do any one of them think they are superior because of their race?

With the exception of Islamic terrorists, do any of them want anything more than the same rights as you?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 24^th, 2020 at 4:22pm:


You cannot comprehend what constitutes a "White Supremacist" because you sympathise with their cause....What exactly was this dickhead hitting back at when he slaughtered innocent people including children....Your answer should be revealing???

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Aug 24^th, 2020 at 4:13pm:


Hey Mr Grappler:

Chill out, everyone gets labeled.  For example if any islamic person wanted to establish supremacy, they are considered as terrorists.  The same with Asians, they are communists.  The blacks - they are gangsters.   The Aborigines probably got the worse deal, they are considered as drunks and criminals. 

And as to this man in question.  He did not go and kill all these people without reason.  He had a clear motive that is consistent with the white supremacy ideology.  He has a manifesto.  He ranted about it on social media.   And he broadcasted his murders proudly on the internet.   Not only it is not mislabeled, it is not even automatically labelled.  It is because he WANTS to be labelled as such. 

Bobby. wrote on Aug 24^th, 2020 at 12:43pm:




seriously bobby  I dont know of too many who think like you do..,, you think one life will pay for 51 ...


you can only kill someone once...

then you have strange ideas...


you must think tough jails are a picnic

tickleandrose wrote on Aug 24^th, 2020 at 5:22pm:


What is this 'white supremacist ideology'?  Is it not more of a resistance to other groups intervening and seeking supremacy?  Does that not make the 'white supremacist' (labeled) more of your 'freedom fighter'?

I'm chilled out enough to look at this thing dispassionately and point out the serious deficiencies in the thinking of many on this and similar subjects.... that is one huge difference between my good self and certain other emotion-lead types who post here and everywhere.

I'm not taking sides here - apart from expressing repeatedly my sympathy for the victims and families and uttering my condemnation of the perpetrator and stating clearly that the victims were innocents - I just think that in order to get to some solid conclusions about this kind of thing, we need to look at the factors involved from all angles.... and not just one, through ideological glasses (even if you don't know that is in the horse feed you are being fed)...

Captain Caveman wrote on Aug 24^th, 2020 at 6:24pm:




I am sure the families of the 51 who lost their lives CARE...

why did he choose NZ?   do we know?>...seems like an odd place to have a problem with Muslims....


I hope after this is all done the families find some peace.