thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 16^th, 2022 at 5:41pm:


Same species, but vastly different in so many ways.
Genetically speaking, the great apes share many of our genes so that they are virtually identical. But that in no way makes them equal.

The fact that they remained pre-stoneage right up to the arrival of their saviours, the magnificent whites, simply goes to show that they were and are too lazy to even advance their kultcha beyond sticks and stones.

Other indigenous people all over the world are far more advanced, even those island bound with little resources.
But here we have a country where coal, iron ore and copper is lying all over the ground and not one of these primitives woke up to the fact that they could process copper, or iron or steel.
Simply too lazy and primitive.
It was even beyond them to attach a rock to a stick.

Excuses abound to justify the aboriginal laziness.
But the simple fact is that if they couldn't burn it or eat it, it never entered their minds.

Does this not remind you of a monkey who's use of a stick as a tool which is is rudementary at best?

You spend so much time justifying the primitive.

Wasnt it pascoe who said abbos were not hunter gatherers?
As for "complex" song and dance.
A 5 year old can and do make up just as complex dances.
Like it or not
Abbos would never have survived this long of not for their saviors ( the whites)
Had the English not taken over, other ( far less tolerant races) woukd certainly have.
And they woukd not have put up with the bull shite we do.

If anything
The abbos should be heartfully thanking us every day for saving them
Tgey should walk up to every white and shake our hands and thank us for what we have done for them.

But no, instead they become terrorists and burn our buildings.
Ungrateful animals.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 18^th, 2022 at 2:44pm:


And we were all 2 year olds once.  But some of us have grown up.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 19^th, 2022 at 11:31am:


Some remain primitive, some revert to primitivism. Some, like the Chinese, have primitivism thrust upon them.
Some revert to being 2 year old, some agitate for the Chinese model of soul-reprimitivisation for mere filthy lucre.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 20^th, 2022 at 2:42pm:


Of course they can! They can be any age or gender they choose to be in the moment. How binary can you get?!

Setanta wrote on Jan 20^th, 2022 at 8:37pm:


You are confusing ideology with fact. You can only be 2 years old once in your life....regardless  of what gender (or anything else) you might  prefer to "choose".

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear two cases challenging racial preferences in admissions at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. Kudos to the Justices for taking this opportunity to vindicate equal treatment under the law regardless of race, especially when the left is pushing racial calculations into policies far beyond campus.

This also is a chance for the Court to correct its own mistakes. Racial quotas are forbidden, but in Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), a 5-4 majority endorsed the idea that race could be a “plus” factor to help colleges seek “the educational benefits that fl5ow from a diverse student body.” Yet there was an expiration date: “We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.”

That deadline is almost here. But two decades later the progressive zeal for divvying up people by race, ethnicity and sexuality has increased. Colleges have begun hosting specific graduation events for black, “Latinx” or LGBT students. Some dorms provide optional “affinity housing.” States and hospitals lately have written race into their policies for allocating scarce Covid-19 treatments. The old goal of “equality” is now passe on the left, which wants “equity,” which means unequal treatment in an attempt to achieve equal results.

Also, what is the limit on a racial plus factor? Students for Fair Admissions, the petitioner in both cases, says Harvard admits 56.1% of black applicants in the top academic decile, compared with 31.3% of Hispanics, 15.3% of whites, and 12.7% of Asians. A black applicant who’s in the fourth-lowest decile, it adds, “has a higher chance of admission (12.8%) than an Asian American in the top decile.”

WSJ

thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 26^th, 2022 at 4:42pm:



You: a common cause and solidarity is not as good as a diverse cause and fragmented solidarity.

Why am I not surprised that you ask such stupid questions and that you need the obvious spelled out for you?