freediver wrote on Jun 15^th, 2020 at 6:29pm:


You don't even know the meaning of the phrase. You don't even know that this is exactly what you do, and not just in this thread. "All muslims support genocide - because it suits my prejudice" is about the most blatant example.

You haven't even begun to explain why assuming halal certifiers are innocent of a crime when there is no evidence to say otherwise - is "making up statistics" and "irrational".

freediver wrote on Jun 15^th, 2020 at 6:54pm:


Halal certifiers obviously.

And in case you are still having trouble with elementary English, you haven't even begun to explain how asserting that zero percent of halal certifier's money going to terrorists when there is no evidence saying otherwise - is "making up statistics" and "irrational".

freediver wrote on Jun 15^th, 2020 at 7:06pm:


Asserting that someone spends 0% of their money in criminal activities - when there is no evidence suggesting otherwise - is not "making up statistics". It is a perfectly reasonable and honest thing to say. You actually agree with this, because you object to the assertion that saying the same about your spear fishing club is also making up statistics. Your explanation of the difference was your claim there was "plenty of evidence" of halal certifiers sending money to terrorists (and presumably not for your spear fishing club).

Hence, your insistence that I am making up statistics in this case is justified purely on the idea that there is "plenty" (presumably translating as "sufficient") of evidence to conclude that it is not 0%.

The problem of course, is there is no evidence, let alone "plenty". You demonstrated this all by yourself when your only justification for such a claim was the idiotic retort that me and all muslims "acted dodgy" about the whole question.

Thus we are back to square one. It seems to me you don't have a leg to stand on - unless one of two things happen: 1. you actually cough up some of this evidence you assure me exists that apparently makes the notion that assuming these certifiers are innocent of the crime of sending money to terrorists is so outrageous, or 2. you exercise a bit of consistency, and concede that the general practice of assuming anyone invests zero amount of their money in criminal activities - when there is no evidence to suggest otherwise - is also "making up statistics" and presumably something to be ridiculed.

freediver wrote on Jun 21^st, 2020 at 6:44pm:


No.

FD if you don't want to address any of my actual points, there really is no compulsion to blurt out the first idiotic and irrelevant thing that comes into your head as a substitute. Remember you always have the option of just not saying anything at all. That would be a lot more intellectually stimulating than this routine.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21^st, 2020 at 7:03pm:


Now now, G, the only thing FD's blurted out in the last 13 years has a question mark on the end. You know, like this:

Quote:


Careful, G, it's a trick question.

Can I nominate Gandalf for sainthood?

Now c'mon be reasonable guys, we know the muzzies are partial to a bit of sex with infants:

Thighing of Female Children in Islam By Dr. Thomas Ahmed

According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was six years old until she reached nine years of age (Fatwa No. 31409).

Therefore, Muslim scholars collectively agree, by virtue of divine example, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.

Thighing" is an Islamic practice still followed today

As for the prophet, his thighing his fiancée Aisha when she was six years of age and not able to consummate the relationship was due to her small age. That is why the Prophet used to place his male member between her thighs and massage it, as the prophet had control of his male member not like other men.

We know the muzzies are the worlds greatest terrorism threat.

BBBBBuuut they will definitely never, hear me never never ever use halal fees for terrorism.

I know I know, here's the trolls' favourite song

pigs are going to fly tomorrow

cows are gunna jump over the moon

dishes will run away with all the spoons

the sun will rise in the west

cos allah knows best

Quote:


What do you mean by 'dodgy'?

Quote:


Still not sure what the point is. You have made repeated references to accusing someone of something, but are yet to tell me who it is we are talking about. As far as I can tell your 'point' amounts to little more than conflating the fact that Muslims fund Islamic terrorism with some idiotic concept of an assumption of guilty until proven innocent that you appear to have concocted.

You are so eager to twist words that you have abandoned conventions of grammar, and now blame me for finding your dribble incomprehensible.