polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 11^th, 2020 at 1:36pm:


Would you like me to bump that thread, so we can go back to discussing your irrational attempts to justify making up statistics?

black lives matter, black lives matter, black lives matter gluggle gluggle gluggle?

Lawsuit alleges that Qatar Charity funded jihad terror attacks that killed Americans and Israelis Jun 12, 2020

In Islam, zakat — the alms required of every Muslim — can and should be given to further the jihad. So it shouldn’t surprise anyone that there are so many jihad-linked charities.

Qatar secretly provided funding for several terror attacks that killed Americans and Israelis,

Qatar allegedly skirted U.S. sanctions on Hamas and PIJ by enlisting several of its charitable organizations in a scheme to funnel funds to the terror groups. As with many other terror financing cases, it was critical this money be provided in U.S. dollars.

Now settle down people, we all know that muzzies fund terrorism by whatever means possible.

But while ever muzzies have sex with kids and cut little girls clits off, they will never use any halal fees to provide funding for terrorism.

I can hear the troll under the railway bridge singing his heart out.

pigs will fly tomorrow

cows will jump over the moon

dishe will run away with spoon

the sun will rise in the west

cos allah knows best.

freediver wrote on Jun 11^th, 2020 at 5:45pm:


Yes, its worth revisiting how we got here FD.

First you say declaring that 0% of halal fees are forwarded on to terrorists is "making up statistics", :"stupid", "lying" - etc etc

I then ask if you would carry on with similar hysterics if someone dared suggest that zero percent of your spear fishing club's money went towards child pornography rings, or that zero percent of ozpolitic's ad revenues went towards far-right terrorists.

After about the 4th time of running away from the question, you eventually retorted that they are not comparable because, in your words, "there is plenty of evidence" that halal certifiers send money to terrorists (presumably as opposed to your spear-fishing club or ozpolitic revenues)

So I then asked the obvious question - what is this evidence? You then revealed that the only thing you had was 'gandalf and muslims acting dodgy' about the whole issue.

We then moved on to me asking you how you think such libelous smears like accusing AFIC of sending money to terrorists (as you did in 2016 re school funding, the topic of which you voluntarily raised, even though it was irrelevant to this issue of halal fees) - as well as assuring us that there was "plenty of evidence" that halal money went to terrorists would hold up in court if you ever uttered them outside the coward's-safety of an anonymous internet user.

And thats the point that we arrived at now - where you once again ignore the pertinent question that you yourself brought us too with your ill-considered "arguments" - and pretend its anyone else but you who's been deflecting.

Or in other words, yet another FD masterclass in obfuscation, arse-covering and tapdancing.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 15^th, 2020 at 2:05pm:


Jolly good. Once FD does that, we can all blame Islam and call it a day.

Off you go, FD.

muslims spending money on terrorism.

For goodness sake, who in the world thought that one up?

Everybody on earth knows that the catholic womens guild, the guide dogs for the blind, the girl guides and the American boy scouts fund islamic terrorism.

muzzies funding islamic terrorism being carried out by the highest grade of muslims, as allah decrees, definitely not.

come on now, everybody 1 2 3

pigs will fly tomorrow

cows will jump over the moon

dishe will run away with spoon

the sun will rise in the west

cos allah knows best.

why do you even bother replying anymore FD? You've long since given up even pretending to address anything related to the actual topic.

Rather than just blindly assume we all agree with your idea of what is "irrational", why don't you explain exactly how its irrational to assert that someone who has no evidence against him/her of sending money to terrorists sends zero percentage of his/her money to terrorists? Explain to us what mental contortions did you go through to interpret this as "making up statistics"? You ask if I want to address the actdual topic, well here it is.

Are you up for actually engaging the topic FD? Or are you just going to idiotically parrot the same meaningless meme over and over? I know its been a long time that you've bothered trying, but please do give it a go.