Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 19
th, 2020 at 12:33pm:
So that leads to confusion, which then leads to the realisation there is no A. Parker at JCU publishing this. He's actually Alberto Boretti. Why the need to publish under two names?
He changed his name.

Sea level Rise?

You do know that the IPCC and the models have a Glacial Isostatic Rebound adjustment in them.
No one knows even how much if it is, if any. There are large cycles in sea level height.
For instance Botany Bay 1961 -1980 Tide Gauge shows height starting at 1.69m (1961) in 1992 it was 1.61m.
http://www.bom.gov.au/ntc/IDO70000/IDO70000_60390_SLD.shtml"The unadjusted values show a deceleration in the rate of sea level rise, whereas the adjusted values show an acceleration. Chen et al. state:
the unadjusted GMSL exhibits a slightly decreasing rate of rise from about 3.5 mm/yr during the first decade to 3.03.3 mm/yr during the second. In contrast, the rate of the GPS-based adjusted GMSL rise increases by 0.5 mm/yr from about 2.4 ± 0.2 (1σ ) mm/yr in 1993 to around 2.9 ± 0.3 mm/yr in 2014 (2.8 ± 0.2 to 3.2 ± 0.3 mm/yr for the GIA-based adjusted GMSL). That is, the time-varying trend of the adjusted altimeter data suggests an acceleration in GMSL , with the dominant increase in the rate of rise occurring in the recent decade."
https://judithcurry.com/2018/06/23/sea-level-rise-isostatic-adjustment/And to confound it all the altimeters have an accuracy of 33mm. But apparently using special maths they can determine it to be about 3mm.