Captain Nemo wrote on Mar 12
th, 2020 at 8:52am:
Yes, it's good bye surplus, but this is all good news for the Coalition.
"It's the economy stupid" has returned with a vengeance.
Speaking of stupid:
https://i.imgur.com/ROI9Ynw.jpgLest we forget those three
nongs
were going to hit the real economy to the tune of $5 Billion per annum.

The country dodged a bullet when it decided not to elect Shorten and his fellow nongs.
Yet, Labor never got in, so what may have happened, would have happened, did happen is a moot point. Labor had some good ideas but failed to sell them. As Doris Day so eloquently put "Que Serra Serra". What cannot be disputed of course, is the disaster that we have now, and have had since 2013 that is the Coalition. So, where is the surplus? I give you the first 3 years of Coalition to rectify Labor's debt, I will even give you Fat Joe Hockey promising surplus after surplus and never achieving it. But why are we now near a trillion dollars of debt after three terms of the Coalition? Where is the surplus to lead us through the Corona Virus disaster? Yes, the Coalition did leave a surplus (meaning they taxed more than they needed_ and yes, Labor used it to stimulate the economy. But, with no surplus after nearly three terms, an economy that is tanking, poor leadership, bad decision making, and feathering own nests we are heading for even more debt as the Coalition borrows yet more money. I also though Labor were a bit on the nose when sniffs of corruption raised their heads, but the Coalition take the cake on that as well! Rolex Watches, in bed with China, sports rorts, travel rorts, missing money, I can't remember etc etc - the list goes on.
I am glad Labor didn't get in - I didn't like Shorten or a lot of his Ministers. But even a dog could run a better Government than this current mob.