cods wrote on Feb 21^st, 2020 at 5:47pm:



you've gone completely nuts. I mean, you were always a little nuts ... but now, you've lost the plot totally. To make the leap from using a phone to talk to his nephew to grooming another kid

I reckon you should confess to being drunk ... even if you're not.

Better to be thought off as a drunk than a nutcase

Gordon wrote on Feb 21^st, 2020 at 6:02pm:




what can we do he wont go back where he belongs.....sad init?

do you remember the days when he was banned from here.....they were so nice

Gordon wrote on Feb 21^st, 2020 at 6:02pm:



to call out morons like you

John Smith wrote on Feb 21^st, 2020 at 6:12pm:


Is that like the old "it takes one to know one"?

Okay lets analyze, and calm down....

the article states: He was charged by police just a month later for allegedly breaching the conditions of the CPR by setting up an Instagram account to follow soccer superstar Cristiano Ronaldo and not telling police within the required seven days. He also was accused of using the phone to speak to a child relative.

The 1st charge, using a computer, and setting up an instagram account.  It seemed that his parole actually DO allow him to use a computer, setting up an account, however, he need to report that to police within seven days.   We had no information to indicate if he did reported late, and if so how late. 

The 2nd charge, using the phone to speak to a child.  The phone has internet.  There are two things the judge would have to consider.  The phone belongs to another relative apparently.   So while he has access to a phone that has internet - that is not his, there is a defense that if he doesnt have any reasonable means to access the internet with it.  For example if the internet is disabled on the phone, if the relative is watching him calling.   And second issue is the intent of the phone call.  For all we know, he could be on the phone for a few seconds just to say bye.   

So as you can see, there are so many questions and details that needed to be iron out.  And there is no such thing as black and white when it comes to law and punishment.  The judges are legally obligated to consider all situation, even when there is mandatory sentencing attach to a crime code. 

In this case, we should refrain from judgement until we know more details of whats happening.

cods wrote on Feb 21^st, 2020 at 9:50am:

Yes.  And nobody has said anything to the contrary.

cods wrote on Feb 21^st, 2020 at 9:50am:

Pay attention.

He hasn't been found guilty on that charge.

rhino wrote on Feb 21^st, 2020 at 6:41pm:


Not sure calling him a paedo is the right way to go here yet. I believe he has no conviction for that, it's sexual assault of a "woman" he was in the can for.

Orkopoulos was released on parole on December 20 after more than a decade behind bars for 30 child sexual abuse and drugs charges and placed on the Child Protection Register.