Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
   
Offline

Australian Politics
Posts: 89659
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender:
|
Ah, the joys of a 'global economy' where all workers are 'equal' and the 'playing field' is 'level' even for the most lowly paid on the planet... but only for those who work for a living.... and the few who own the global corporations prosper mightily, their shareholders get enough to make them think they are someone special, and all the while national economies grind to a halt unless governments take action.
You can impoverish some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time - but you can't impoverish all of the people all of the time...
"The economic policies of Donald Trump, which were outlined in his campaign pledges, include trade protectionism, immigration reduction, individual and corporate tax reform, the dismantling of banking regulation, and attempts to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare"). A key part of President Trump's economic strategy during his first three years (2017–2019) was to boost economic growth by increasing the federal budget deficit significantly via tax cuts and additional spending. The positive economic situation he inherited from President Obama continued, with a labor market approaching full employment and measures of household income and wealth continuing to improve further into record territory. President Trump also implemented trade protectionism via tariffs, primarily on imports from China, as part of his "America First" strategy. However, the number of people without health insurance increased due to his policies, while his tax cuts were projected to worsen income inequality."
Can't say I agree with all of those moves - for my money the ones that actually work were accepting a higher federal budget deficit, trade protection in an environment where the de facto tariff of far lower wages such as in China (where the CHIMP earns around $57k a year and the average is around $7k a year and the 'Communist president earns billions through his 'shares'), restricting immigration and allowing the economy to re-stabilise without all the shenanigans, and to some extent tax reform though I doubt companies really need it.
Reducing bank regulation is a false path leading into a multitude of mine fields as we've seen here, and the 'net cost' of universal healthcare is zero, given that it is actually an economic stimulator including in providing a healthy and more motivated workforce, whereas imbalance in affordability of healthcare is not, but is instead a brake on real development and research through the personal profit motive over-riding the push to develop and move forward.
We've all seen here that the 'private business model' does not provide the goods in many areas of life - specifically in the provision of services.
|