Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Feb 16
th, 2020 at 4:26pm:
overlooking the simple reality that you are seeking preferential treatment on the basis of some flimsy point...
Tenez Le Droit - does not translate to Tenuous Rot.
"Sydney man, Bill Gertos,
took possession of a home in 1998, after its occupant died.
After noticing the abandoned property,
he changed the locks, performed renovations and
rented it out, before recently bringing a court application to apply for ownership.
The test Mr Gertos needed to prove to be entitled to legal ownership of the land was:
He had uninterrupted possession of the property for at least 12 years (the same applies in Queensland and Western Australia, however in Victoria and South Australia it is 15 years)."
11 years pass. "Mr Gertos that's my dad's house."
"Oh no it's not heh heh..It's all mine".
"It would be in 5 days, but now it's mine"
"5 days?"
"5 days".
So in effect he trespassed, broke & entered ... didn't even squat ....
to me he stole a house & made money from it.
So if someone from the family who actually owned it fronted him ...... if he has effectively won the right to the house.....
the total he made in rent from the time he started until his claim was actually granted should be paid to the real owners.
Mr. Gertos is not a nice man .... in fact he's a scumbag & a thief.