Ajax wrote on Jan 15^th, 2020 at 7:21am:


But your OP for this thread is all about a secret conspiracy with passenger aircraft and chemtrails.

So you're linking contrails, to chemtrails, to geo-engineering.

I think it's safe to say you are of the opinion that there is a secret global effort to hide these chemicals in the passenger planes to seed the skies right? 

If you didn't think this were true why are you pushing the information supporting it?

And the links with your supporting evidence of geoengineering is not the "geo-engineering" that all these articles are referring to.

You're trying to justify the conspiracy with content that is unrelated.

Perhaps "deluded" was too harsh a word, maybe "uneducated and easily mislead" is more appropriate?

There is always an answer for everything, but sometimes not even science yet knowns that answer, and that's ok.  It's ok not to know the answer so long as you keep asking the question.

Getting an answer that you can understand, even if it's incorrect, just to satisfy the human curiosity is understandable, but with so much misinformation out there today, much of it to deliberately mislead the gullible means people often start accepting conspiracies because they're crafted to be easily understood.

Some interests are so intent on guiding the conversation away from issues that impact them, such as climate change that they're pushing the notion that the bushfire intensity is because of the chemtrails spraying Barium carbonate, strontium and even aluminium to control our weather, our food supplies and to keep us docile.

The dought is deliberate, the flooding is deliberate and the bushfires, they were deliberate.

WHAT!?

Again, the need to have answers that people like with the added bonus of them feeling special because they know a hidden truth, that trumps the hard work it takes to actually research what is going on, especially when you can be fed the answers you like on YouTube and Facebook at the click of a button, no thinking needed.

I'm been dealing with people like that for so long I sometimes find it hard to tell if it's that sort of Dunning–Kruger certainty in what they believe, or they're just trolling.

That was what I meant.